World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
53
Citations
10037
World Ranking
16165
National Ranking
6697

Edwin Michael publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin Michael sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Edwin Michael D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin Michael sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edwin Michael is affiliated with the University of Notre Dame in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a specific concentration on Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Modeling and Simulation, Ecology, and Parasitology.

Their recent publications address significant topics related to infectious diseases and their broader impacts. Notable papers include:

  • "Predicted Impact of COVID-19 on Neglected Tropical Disease Programs and the Opportunity for Innovation" (2020), published in Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • "Evaluating and mitigating the potential indirect effect of COVID-19 on control programmes for seven neglected tropical diseases: a modelling study" (2022), published in The Lancet Global Health
  • "Delays in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes due to COVID-19, and possible mitigation strategies" (2021), published in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
  • "The Hard Lessons and Shifting Modeling Trends of COVID-19 Dynamics: Multiresolution Modeling Approach" (2021), published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
  • "Comparing antigenaemia- and microfilaraemia as criteria for stopping decisions in lymphatic filariasis elimination programmes in Africa" (2022), published in PLoS neglected tropical diseases

Their research topics cover diverse but interconnected areas, including:

  • Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Parasites and Host Interactions
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts

Edwin Michael collaborates frequently with a range of coauthors. Some of the most frequent collaborators include Ken Newcomb, Morgan E. Smith, Shakir Bilal, Rocio Caja Rivera, and T. Déirdre Hollingsworth.

The scientist's work appears extensively in certain publication venues. These venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
  • PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • Scientific Reports

Their multidisciplinary approach integrates modeling and simulation to evaluate public health challenges with a specific focus on infectious diseases and parasitology. Their research contributes to understanding the epidemiological impacts of diseases such as COVID-19 and various neglected tropical diseases, often emphasizing lymphatic filariasis and mosquito-borne illnesses.

Best Publications

  • Re-assessing the global prevalence and distribution of lymphatic filariasis.

    E. Michael;D. A. P. Bundy;B. T. Grenfell

  • Modeling the effects of weather and climate change on malaria transmission.

    Paul Edward Parham;Edwin Michael

  • A systematic review of mathematical models of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission: 1970–2010

    Robert C Reiner;Robert C Reiner;T Alex Perkins;T Alex Perkins;Christopher M Barker;Christopher M Barker;Tianchan Niu;Tianchan Niu

  • Climate, environmental and socio-economic change: weighing up the balance in vector-borne disease transmission

    Paul E. Parham;Paul E. Parham;Joanna Waldock;Joanna Waldock;George K. Christophides;Deborah Hemming

  • The economic burden of lymphatic filariasis in India.

    Kapa D Ramaiah;Pradeep K Das;Edwin Michael;Helen L Guyatt

  • The potential of geographical information systems and remote sensing in the epidemiology and control of human helminth infections.

    S Brooker;E Michael

  • Global mapping of lymphatic filariasis

    E. Michael;D.A.P. Bundy

  • Role of vector control in the global program to eliminate lymphatic filariasis

    Moses J. Bockarie;Erling M. Pedersen;Graham B. White;Edwin Michael

  • Mathematical modelling and the control of lymphatic filariasis

    Edwin Michael;Mwele N Malecela-Lazaro;Paul E Simonsen;Erling M Pedersen

  • The role of environmental variables on Aedes albopictus biology and chikungunya epidemiology.

    Joanna Waldock;Nastassya L. Chandra;Jos Lelieveld;Yiannis Proestos

  • Recasting the theory of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission dynamics and control

    David L. Smith;T. Alex Perkins;T. Alex Perkins;Robert C. Reiner;Robert C. Reiner;Christopher M. Barker;Christopher M. Barker

  • Episodic adenolymphangitis and lymphoedema in patients with bancroftian filariasis

    S.P. Pani;J. Yuvaraj;P. Vanamail;V. Dhanda

  • Predicting the Current and Future Potential Distributions of Lymphatic Filariasis in Africa Using Maximum Entropy Ecological Niche Modelling

    Hannah Slater;Edwin Michael

  • Incidence, risk factors and clinical epidemiology of melioidosis: a complex socio-ecological emerging infectious disease in the Alor Setar region of Kedah, Malaysia.

    Muhammad R A Hassan;Subhada P Pani;Ng P Peng;Kirtanaa Voralu

  • Mapping of lymphatic filariasis in India.

    Sabesan S;Palaniyandi M;Das Pk;Michael E

  • A systematic review of mathematical models of mosquito-borne pathogen transmission: 1970-2010

    Robert C. Reiner;Alex Perkins;Christopher M. Barker;Tianchan Niu

  • Is the current decline in malaria burden in sub-Saharan Africa due to a decrease in vector population?

    Dan W Meyrowitsch;Erling M Pedersen;Michael Alifrangis;Thomas H Scheike

  • Mass chemotherapy options to control lymphatic filariasis: a systematic review

    Daniel J Tisch;Edwin Michael;James W Kazura

  • Effectiveness of a triple-drug regimen for global elimination of lymphatic filariasis: A modelling study

    Michael Alastair Irvine;Wilma A. Stolk;Morgan E. Smith;Swaminathan Subramanian

  • EPIFIL: the development of an age-structured model for describing the transmission dynamics and control of lymphatic filariasis.

    Rachel Norman;Man-Suen Chan;AdiNarayanan Srividya;S P Pani

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul E. Simonsen
Paul E. Simonsen University of Copenhagen
Donald A.P. Bundy
Donald A.P. Bundy London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
James W. Kazura
James W. Kazura Case Western Reserve University
Walter Jaoko
Walter Jaoko University of Nairobi
Bryan T. Grenfell
Bryan T. Grenfell Princeton University
Moses J. Bockarie
Moses J. Bockarie European & Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership
Sake J. de Vlas
Sake J. de Vlas Erasmus University Rotterdam
Andrew J. Tatem
Andrew J. Tatem University of Southampton
Luis Fernando Chaves
Luis Fernando Chaves Nagasaki University
Derek A. T. Cummings
Derek A. T. Cummings University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open doors to a variety of specialized healthcare careers in the USA. Today, many professionals are opting for flexible online learning to enhance their credentials or switch fields without interrupting their current roles. Online programs cater to both recent graduates and experienced practitioners seeking advanced or allied health qualifications.

For those interested in psychiatric and mental health nursing, the shortest pmhnp program options can help you enter this specialty more quickly. If you already hold a master's degree and wish to become a Family Nurse Practitioner, consider the fastest post master's fnp certificate for rapid career progression.

For students interested in nutrition, health, or wellness fields, earning an online dietitian degree can be an affordable way to build expertise and qualify for licensure. Additionally, registered nurses may want to consider the easiest rn to bsn program to expand their professional scope and earning potential.

Each of these pathways offers unique advantages, making it easier for students and professionals to find programs that fit their timelines, budgets, and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin Michael

Trending Scientists