What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Statistics
- Game theory
- Microeconomics
Eddie Dekel focuses on Mathematical economics, Nash equilibrium, Rationalizability, Solution concept and Equilibrium selection.
The various areas that Eddie Dekel examines in his Mathematical economics study include Probability measure, Preference and Rationality.
His Nash equilibrium study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Bayesian game and Robustness.
His work deals with themes such as Self-confirming equilibrium and Algorithmic learning theory, which intersect with Bayesian game.
Eddie Dekel has included themes like Common knowledge and Complete information in his Rationalizability study.
His work carried out in the field of Solution concept brings together such families of science as Proper equilibrium, Symmetric equilibrium and Correlated equilibrium.
His most cited work include:
- Hierarchies of Beliefs and Common Knowledge (339 citations)
- An axiomatic characterization of preferences under uncertainty: Weakening the independence axiom (301 citations)
- RATIONALIZABILITY AND CORRELATED EQUILIBRIA (284 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Mathematical economics, Nash equilibrium, Rationalizability, Microeconomics and Stochastic game.
The Game theory research he does as part of his general Mathematical economics study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Set, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
His work on Best response and Epsilon-equilibrium as part of general Nash equilibrium study is frequently connected to Learning theory, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
His study in Rationalizability is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Common knowledge, Metric, Solution concept and Topology.
His research investigates the connection with Common knowledge and areas like Complete information which intersect with concerns in Repeated game and Bayesian game.
Eddie Dekel works mostly in the field of Certainty, limiting it down to topics relating to Path and, in certain cases, Self-confirming equilibrium, as a part of the same area of interest.
He most often published in these fields:
- Mathematical economics (63.85%)
- Nash equilibrium (19.23%)
- Rationalizability (20.00%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2019)?
- Mathematical economics (63.85%)
- Financial services (3.08%)
- Financial econometrics (3.08%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Mathematical economics, Financial services, Financial econometrics, Applied economics and Principal are his primary areas of study.
Particularly relevant to Rationalizability is his body of work in Mathematical economics.
His Rationalizability research integrates issues from Formal language, Premise and Expected utility hypothesis.
His studies in Financial services integrate themes in fields like Regional science, Economic history and Neoclassical economics.
His Principal study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Optimal mechanism, Mechanism design and Value.
His work in Robustness covers topics such as Equilibrium selection which are related to areas like Stochastic game.
Between 2011 and 2019, his most popular works were:
- Epistemic Game Theory (56 citations)
- Optimal Allocation with Costly Verification (35 citations)
- Costly Self‐Control and Random Self‐Indulgence (32 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Game theory
- Statistics
- Microeconomics
His primary areas of investigation include Mathematical economics, restrict, Disjoint sets, Characterization and State space.
Eddie Dekel has researched Mathematical economics in several fields, including Advertising and Representation.
Restrict overlaps with fields such as State, Iterated function, Interpretation and Lexicographical order in his research.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
