World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 95 10210 9582 5249 4849 252 26235

De-Maw Chuang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by De-Maw Chuang between 1971 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. De-Maw Chuang published across 55 years, from 1971 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2011. 4 of the 256 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2011. 1971: 2 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 2 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 7 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1971 2025

256 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
De-Maw Chuang: publications per year, 1971 to 2025
Year Publications
1971 2
1972 1
1973 1
1974 2
1975 2
1976 2
1977 3
1978 3
1979 4
1980 3
1981 5
1982 4
1983 7
1984 5
1985 6
1986 5
1987 5
1988 5
1989 5
1990 8
1991 7
1992 7
1993 9
1994 3
1995 4
1996 10
1997 3
1998 5
1999 9
2000 2
2001 4
2002 11
2003 9
2004 7
2005 8
2006 7
2007 7
2008 6
2009 6
2010 4
2011 12
2012 5
2013 6
2014 6
2015 5
2016 4
2017 3
2018 1
2019 0
2020 2
2021 0
2022 1
2023 1
2024 1
2025 3
Total 256
Download as CSV

De-Maw Chuang publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where De-Maw Chuang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 252 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 252
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

De-Maw Chuang D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where De-Maw Chuang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 94–95 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808 95
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

De-Maw Chuang is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily within biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, along with medicine. Specific subfields include molecular biology, neurology, clinical psychology, epidemiology, and complementary and alternative medicine.

Their scholarly work engages deeply with topics such as fibroblast growth factor research, Kruppel-like factors research, epigenetics and DNA methylation, intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhage research, and traumatic brain injury as well as neurovascular disturbances. Acupuncture treatment research also forms part of their research focus.

  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
  • Kruppel-like factors research
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies

De-Maw Chuang has authored several recent papers covering experimental stroke, neurodegenerative disease models, oxidative stress, inflammation, and brain injury mechanisms. Notable publications include:

  • "Mesenchymal Stem Cells Overexpressing FGF21 Preserve Blood-Brain Barrier Integrity in Experimental Ischemic Stroke," 2023, published in Translational Stroke Research
  • "Overexpression of fibroblast growth factor-21 (FGF-21) protects mesenchymal stem cells against caspase-dependent apoptosis induced by oxidative stress and inflammation," 2020, published in Cell Biology International
  • "Electroacupuncture improves TBI dysfunction by targeting HDAC overexpression and BDNF-associated Akt/GSK-3β signaling," 2022, published in Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
  • "Intranasal Delivery of Lithium Salt Suppresses Inflammatory Pyroptosis in the Brain and Ameliorates Memory Loss and Depression-like Behavior in 5XFAD Mice," 2025, published in Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
  • "Intranasal administration of mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing FGF21 demonstrates therapeutic potential in experimental Parkinson's disease," 2024, published in Neurotherapeutics

The research venues where De-Maw Chuang's work appears include Translational Stroke Research, Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, Cell Biology International, Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, and Neurotherapeutics.

  • Translational Stroke Research
  • Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
  • Cell Biology International
  • Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology
  • Neurotherapeutics

Collaboration is also a significant aspect of De-Maw Chuang's research activities. Frequent co-authors include Shih-Ya Hung, Piplu Bhuiyan, Liang Ge, Ying Wang, and Huafeng Wei, each having worked together on multiple occasions.

Best Publications

  • Multiple roles of HDAC inhibition in neurodegenerative conditions.

    De-Maw Chuang;Yan Leng;Zoya Marinova;Hyeon-Ju Kim

  • Lithium activates the serine/threonine kinase Akt-1 and suppresses glutamate-induced inhibition of Akt-1 activity in neurons

    Elzbieta Chalecka-Franaszek;De-Maw Chuang

  • Histone deacetylase inhibitors exhibit anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects in a rat permanent ischemic model of stroke: multiple mechanisms of action.

    Hyeon Ju Kim;Michael Rowe;Ming Ren;Jau-Shyong Hong

  • Long Term Lithium Treatment Suppresses p53 and Bax Expression but Increases Bcl-2 Expression A PROMINENT ROLE IN NEUROPROTECTION AGAINST EXCITOTOXICITY

    Ren-Wu Chen;De-Maw Chuang

  • Chronic lithium treatment robustly protects neurons in the central nervous system against excitotoxicity by inhibiting N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor-mediated calcium influx

    Shigeyuki Nonaka;Christopher J. Hough;De-Maw Chuang

  • Coupling of inositol phospholipid metabolism with excitatory amino acid recognition sites in rat hippocampus.

    F. Nicoletti;J. L. Meek;M. J. Iadarola;D. M. Chuang

  • Therapeutic Potential of Mood Stabilizers Lithium and Valproic Acid: Beyond Bipolar Disorder

    Chi-Tso Chiu;Zhifei Wang;Joshua G. Hunsberger;De-Maw Chuang

  • Valproic acid reduces brain damage induced by transient focal cerebral ischemia in rats: potential roles of histone deacetylase inhibition and heat shock protein induction

    Ming Ren;Yan Leng;MiRa Jeong;Peter R. Leeds

  • Valproate protects dopaminergic neurons in midbrain neuron/glia cultures by stimulating the release of neurotrophic factors from astrocytes

    Po-See Chen;G. S. Peng;G. S. Peng;G. Li;S. Yang

  • The mood stabilizers lithium and valproate selectively activate the promoter IV of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in neurons

    Yasuda S;Liang Mh;Marinova Z;Yahyavi A

  • Lithium protection against glutamate excitotoxicity in rat cerebral cortical neurons: involvement of NMDA receptor inhibition possibly by decreasing NR2B tyrosine phosphorylation

    Ryota Hashimoto;Christopher Hough;Takanobu Nakazawa;Tadashi Yamamoto

  • GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE, APOPTOSIS, AND NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES*

    De-Maw Chuang;Christopher Hough;Vladimir V. Senatorov

  • Histone deacetylase inhibitors up-regulate astrocyte GDNF and BDNF gene transcription and protect dopaminergic neurons

    Xuefei Wu;Po See Chen;Po See Chen;Shannon Dallas;Belinda Wilson

  • Lithium induces brain-derived neurotrophic factor and activates TrkB in rodent cortical neurons: an essential step for neuroprotection against glutamate excitotoxicity.

    Ryota Hashimoto;Nobuyuki Takei;Kazuhiro Shimazu;Lori Christ

  • The HDAC inhibitor, sodium butyrate, stimulates neurogenesis in the ischemic brain

    Hyeon Ju Kim;Peter Leeds;De-Maw Chuang

  • Neuroprotective effects of chronic lithium on focal cerebral ischemia in rats.

    Shigeyuki Nonaka;De-Maw Chuang

  • Synergistic neuroprotective effects of lithium and valproic acid or other histone deacetylase inhibitors in neurons: roles of glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibition.

    Yan Leng;Min-Huei Liang;Ming Ren;Zoya Marinova

  • Neuroprotective effects of lithium in cultured cells and animal models of diseases.

    De-Maw Chuang;Ren-Wu Chen;Elzbieta Chalecka-Franaszek;Elzbieta Chalecka-Franaszek;Ming Ren

  • COMBINED LITHIUM AND VALPROATE TREATMENT DELAYS DISEASE ONSET, REDUCES NEUROLOGICAL DEFICITS AND PROLONGS SURVIVAL IN AN AMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS MOUSE MODEL

    H.-L. Feng;Y. Leng;C.-H. Ma;J. Zhang

  • Evidence that glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase is involved in age-induced apoptosis in mature cerebellar neurons in culture

    Ryoichi Ishitani;Katsuyoshi Sunaga;Atsushi Hirano;Paul Saunders

Frequent Co-Authors

Erminio Costa
Erminio Costa National Institutes of Health
Wan-Wan Lin
Wan-Wan Lin National Taiwan University
Po See Chen
Po See Chen National Cheng Kung University
Robert M. Post
Robert M. Post George Washington University
Ryota Hashimoto
Ryota Hashimoto National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
Bryan L. Roth
Bryan L. Roth University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Jau-Shyong Hong
Jau-Shyong Hong National Institutes of Health
Thomas N. Chase
Thomas N. Chase National Institutes of Health
Susan R. Weiss
Susan R. Weiss University of Pennsylvania
Richard Jed Wyatt
Richard Jed Wyatt National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online programs can be an excellent way to enter or advance in the medical field. Many students consider online rn to bsn programs without clinical requirements, which provide greater flexibility and faster completion for working registered nurses who want to earn a bachelor's degree.

For those aiming for advanced practice and leadership roles, a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a popular choice. You can find dnp programs online that allow you to earn this terminal degree on your schedule. There are also easiest online dnp programs that prioritize accessibility and work-life balance, ideal for busy professionals.

If you’re seeking a quicker entry into nursing, fast track lpn programs online can help you start your healthcare career sooner. Each of these pathways offers unique benefits, allowing you to choose the program that fits your career goals and current commitments.

Best Scientists Citing De-Maw Chuang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles