World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
102
Citations
31229
World Ranking
1395
National Ranking
799

David L. Garbers publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Garbers sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 266 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

David L. Garbers D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David L. Garbers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

David L. Garbers was affiliated with The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in the United States. Their research primarily focused on areas within Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, covering five publications in these fields. Subfields of study included Genetics, Molecular Biology, Physiology, and Sensory Systems.

The scientist's main research topics encompassed Animal Genetics and Reproduction, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Virus-based Gene Therapy Research, Calcium Signaling and Nucleotide Metabolism, and Ion Channels and Receptors, particularly the regulation and function of ion channels.

David L. Garbers contributed to the scientific literature with the following notable papers:

  • Production of transgenic rats by lentiviral transduction of male germ-line stem cells, 2020, UNC Libraries
  • CatSper and Two-Pore channels (TPC) in GtoPdb v.2022.1, 2022, IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE

Frequent collaborators included F. Kent Hamra, Joel Gatlin, Karen Chapman, Dana M. Grellhesl, and Juliana Garcia, with each having co-authored at least one paper alongside Garbers.

The scientist published in venues such as UNC Libraries and the IUPHAR/BPS Guide to Pharmacology CITE.

Best Publications

  • A membrane form of guanylate cyclase is an atrial natriuretic peptide receptor.

    Michael Chinkers;David L. Garbers;Ming-Shi Chang;David G. Lowe

  • Inhibition of membrane phosphotyrosyl-protein phosphatase activity by vanadate.

    Ghanshyam Swarup;Stanley Cohen;David L. Garbers

  • Guanylyl cyclase is a heat-stable enterotoxin receptor

    Stephanie Schulz;Cecelia K. Green;Peter S.T. Yuen;David L. Garbers;David L. Garbers

  • A multitude of genes expressed solely in meiotic or postmeiotic spermatogenic cells offers a myriad of contraceptive targets

    Nikolaus Schultz;F. Kent Hamra;David L. Garbers

  • The primary structure of a plasma membrane guanylate cyclase demonstrates diversity within this new receptor family.

    Stephanie Schulz;Sujay Singh;Rae Ann Bellet;Gita Singh

  • Salt-resistant hypertension in mice lacking the guanylyl cyclase-A receptor for atrial natriuretic peptide

    M. James Lopez;Stephen K.F. Wong;Ichiro Kishimoto;Susan Dubois

  • Guanylyl cyclase expression in specific sensory neurons: A new family of chemosensory receptors

    Sidney Yu;Leon Avery;Eric Baude;David L. Garbers

  • The family of guanylyl cyclase receptors and their ligands.

    James G. Drewett;David L. Garbers

  • Hyperactivated sperm motility driven by CatSper2 is required for fertilization

    Timothy A. Quill;Sarah A. Sugden;Kristen L. Rossi;Lynda K. Doolittle

  • Guanylyl cyclase receptors and their endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine ligands

    David L. Garbers

  • CatSper1 required for evoked Ca2+ entry and control of flagellar function in sperm

    Anne E. Carlson;Ruth E. Westenbroek;Timothy Quill;Dejian Ren

  • The Protein Kinase Domain of the ANP Receptor Is Required for Signaling

    Michael Chinkers;David L. Garbers

  • A voltage-gated ion channel expressed specifically in spermatozoa.

    Timothy A. Quill;Dejian Ren;David E. Clapham;David L. Garbers

  • Human atrial natriuretic peptide receptor defines a new paradigm for second messenger signal transduction.

    D. G. Lowe;Ming-Shi Chang;R. Hellmiss;E. Chen

  • A subset of olfactory neurons that selectively express cGMP-stimulated phosphodiesterase (PDE2) and guanylyl cyclase-D define a unique olfactory signal transduction pathway

    Dawn M. Juilfs;Hans-Jürgen Fülle;Allan Z. Zhao;Miles D. Houslay

  • Guanylyl cyclase receptors.

    D L Garbers;D G Lowe

  • Critical roles of the guanylyl cyclase B receptor in endochondral ossification and development of female reproductive organs.

    Naohisa Tamura;Lynda K. Doolittle;Robert E. Hammer;John M. Shelton

  • Pressure-independent cardiac hypertrophy in mice with cardiomyocyte-restricted inactivation of the atrial natriuretic peptide receptor guanylyl cyclase-A

    Rita Holtwick;Martin van Eickels;Boris V. Skryabin;Hideo A. Baba

  • Chemotaxis of Arbacia punctulata spermatozoa to resact, a peptide from the egg jelly layer.

    Gary E. Ward;Charles J. Brokaw;David L. Garbers;Victor D. Vacquier

  • A genetic model provides evidence that the receptor for atrial natriuretic peptide (guanylyl cyclase-A) inhibits cardiac ventricular myocyte hypertrophy

    Ichiro Kishimoto;Kristen Rossi;David L. Garbers

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Hammer
Robert E. Hammer The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Kazuwa Nakao
Kazuwa Nakao Kyoto University
Ruey-Bing Yang
Ruey-Bing Yang Academia Sinica
Yoshihiko Saito
Yoshihiko Saito Nara Medical University
David V. Goeddel
David V. Goeddel The Colum Group
David E. Clapham
David E. Clapham Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Akiyoshi Fukamizu
Akiyoshi Fukamizu University of Tsukuba
Joseph P. Albanesi
Joseph P. Albanesi The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Neal L. First
Neal L. First University of Wisconsin–Madison
Bryan G. Fry
Bryan G. Fry University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry in the USA opens up a range of career opportunities, especially in healthcare, research, and information management. Students often find appealing options in medical coding and health information roles, which offer stability and growth potential.

One related career direction is becoming a certified coding specialist. This role involves translating medical diagnoses and procedures into codes for billing and data analysis. Salaries are competitive, and there’s increasing demand for skilled professionals.

Those interested in salary details and steps required can read more about the certified medical coder salary and pathways to certification. The medical billing and coding outlook remains bright as healthcare data and technology continue to expand.

For students seeking flexibility, a health information management degree online can provide entry into these lucrative and growing fields. This degree also paves the way for progression into advanced data and management roles within healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing David L. Garbers

Recently Published Articles