World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
8857
World Ranking
5474
National Ranking
2988

Cleve Redmond publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cleve Redmond sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Cleve Redmond D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cleve Redmond sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cleve Redmond was affiliated with Iowa State University in the United States. Their research contributed to the fields of social sciences, psychology, and health professions, with particular focus on clinical psychology, general health professions, sociology and political science, epidemiology, and speech and hearing.

Their scholarly work spanned several topics, including child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, health policy implementation science, community health and development, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, adolescent and pediatric healthcare, family support in illness, and family and disability support research.

Redmond's published papers included the following:

  • Applying the PROSPER prevention delivery system with middle schools: Emerging adulthood effects on substance misuse and conduct problem behaviors through 14 years past baseline, 2022, Child Development
  • Multivariate growth trajectories of parenting practices in adolescence predicting young adult relationships with parents, 2022, Developmental Psychology
  • Predictors of Attendance Patterns in a Universal Family-Based Preventive Intervention Program, 2021, The Journal of Primary Prevention
  • Collateral Benefits of Evidence-Based Substance Use Prevention Programming During Middle-School on Young Adult Romantic Relationship Functioning, 2021, Prevention Science
  • A missed research opportunity for effective prevention: Clery Act Timely Warning Notices, 2020, Journal of American College Health

Frequent coauthors who collaborated with Redmond included:

  • Mark E. Feinberg
  • Richard Spoth
  • Gregory M. Fosco
  • Shichen Fang
  • Emily J. LoBraico

The scientist's publications were distributed across several academic journals, notably:

  • Child Development
  • Developmental Psychology
  • The Journal of Primary Prevention
  • Prevention Science
  • Journal of American College Health

Best Publications

  • Randomized trial of brief family interventions for general populations: adolescent substance use outcomes 4 years following baseline.

    Richard L. Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Chungyeol Shin

  • PROSPER community-university partnership model for public education systems: capacity-building for evidence-based, competence-building prevention.

    Richard Spoth;Mark Greenberg;Karen Bierman;Cleve Redmond

  • Direct and indirect latent-variable parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: extending a public health-oriented research base.

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Chungyeol Shin

  • Research on Family Engagement in Preventive Interventions: Toward Improved Use of Scientific Findings in Primary Prevention Practice

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond

  • Longitudinal substance initiation outcomes for a universal preventive intervention combining family and school programs.

    Richard L. Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Linda Trudeau;Chungyeol Shin

  • Barriers to Participation in Family Skills Preventive Interventions and Their Evaluations: A Replication and Extension

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Cathy Hockaday;Chung Yeol Shin

  • Brief family intervention effects on adolescent substance initiation: school-level growth curve analyses 6 years following baseline.

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Chungyeol Shin;Kari Azevedo

  • Substance-use outcomes at 18 months past baseline: the PROSPER Community-University Partnership Trial.

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Chungyeol Shin;Mark Greenberg

  • Parent motivation to enroll in parenting skills programs: A model of family context and health belief predictors.

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond

  • Assessing a public health approach to delay onset and progression of adolescent substance use: latent transition and log-linear analyses of longitudinal family preventive intervention outcomes.

    R. Spoth;M. Lopez Reyes;C. Redmond;Chungyeol Shin

  • Alcohol initiation outcomes of universal family-focused preventive interventions: one- and two-year follow-ups of a controlled study

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Heidi Lepper

  • A controlled parenting skills outcome study examining individual difference and attendance effects

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Kevin Haggerty;Thomas Ward

  • Engaging families in longitudinal preventive intervention research: discrete-time survival analysis of socioeconomic and social-emotional risk factors.

    Richard Spoth;Catherine Goldberg;Cleve Redmond

  • Toward dissemination of evidence-based family interventions: maintenance of community-based partnership recruitment results and associated factors.

    Richard Spoth;Scott Clair;Mark Greenberg;Cleve Redmond

  • Modeling factors influencing enrollment in family-focused preventive intervention research.

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Chungyeol Shin

  • Universal Intervention Effects on Substance Use among Young Adults Mediated by Delayed Adolescent Substance Initiation.

    Richard Spoth;Linda Trudeau;Max Guyll;Chungyeol Shin

  • PROSPER STUDY OF EVIDENCE-BASED INTERVENTION IMPLEMENTATION QUALITY BY COMMUNITY-UNIVERSITY PARTNERSHIPS.

    Richard L. Spoth;Max Guyll;Catherine J. Lillehoj;Cleve Redmond

  • Longitudinal Effects of Universal Preventive Intervention on Prescription Drug Misuse: Three Randomized Controlled Trials With Late Adolescents and Young Adults

    Richard Spoth;Linda Trudeau;Chungyeol Shin;Ekaterina Ralston

  • PROSPER community–university partnership delivery system effects on substance misuse through 6 1/2 years past baseline from a cluster randomized controlled intervention trial

    Richard Spoth;Cleve Redmond;Chungyeol Shin;Mark Greenberg

  • Substance use outcomes 5½ years past baseline for partnership-based, family-school preventive interventions

    Richard L. Spoth;G. Kevin Randall;Linda Trudeau;Chungyeol Shin

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard Spoth
Richard Spoth Iowa State University
Mark T. Greenberg
Mark T. Greenberg Pennsylvania State University
Mark E. Feinberg
Mark E. Feinberg Pennsylvania State University
Kevin P. Haggerty
Kevin P. Haggerty University of Washington
W. Alex Mason
W. Alex Mason University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Rick Kosterman
Rick Kosterman University of Washington
J. David Hawkins
J. David Hawkins University of Washington
Daniel F. Perkins
Daniel F. Perkins Pennsylvania State University
Jenae M. Neiderhiser
Jenae M. Neiderhiser Pennsylvania State University
Mark D. Shriver
Mark D. Shriver Pennsylvania State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of career paths, including licensed counseling roles. Many accredited universities offer online degrees that prepare students for specialized fields such as clinical psychology, marriage and family therapy, or school counseling. These degrees can be the first step toward meeting state-specific licensing requirements to practice professionally.

It’s important to note that requirements for becoming a licensed counselor can vary from state to state, and even from city to city. For example, those interested in meeting the licensed therapist requirements in Fresno will find a process unique to California. Meanwhile, the path to licensure follows a different procedure for those working to fulfill the licensed therapist requirements in Garland and the licensed therapist requirements in Gilbert.

Future counselors should research local laws, exam details, and supervised experience requirements. For insight into Arizona's process, see the Glendale licensed therapist requirements. Choosing the right online degree—one that aligns with your career goals and local licensure rules—can make a significant difference in your professional journey.

Best Scientists Citing Cleve Redmond

Recently Published Articles