World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
40
Citations
27913
World Ranking
7140
National Ranking
1933

Clayton Lewis publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clayton Lewis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 149 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Clayton Lewis D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clayton Lewis sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clayton Lewis is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research focuses on a range of topics within computer science, particularly in the areas of artificial intelligence and human-computer interaction.

The main fields of study addressed by Lewis include:

  • Computer Science

Lewis's work spans several subfields of study such as:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Health Informatics
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Key research topics explored by Lewis comprise:

  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Usability and User Interface Design

Clayton Lewis has published several papers in notable venues. Some of their recent publications include:

  • "Implications of developments in machine learning for people with cognitive disabilities," 2020, ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
  • "Looking Ahead at Inclusive Technology," 2024, Communications of the ACM

These papers contribute to the understanding and development of accessibility and inclusive technologies by applying artificial intelligence and human-centered design principles.

Lewis has collaborated frequently with researchers including:

  • Shaun K. Kane
  • Richard E. Ladner (two publications)
  • Emily Shea Tanis (one publication)

Lewis's frequent publishing venues reflect their research focus, with notable appearances in:

  • ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Communications of the ACM

Best Publications

  • Designing for usability: Key principles and what designers think

    J. D. Gould;C. Lewis

  • The cognitive walkthrough method: a practitioner's guide

    Cathleen Wharton;John Rieman;Clayton Lewis;Peter Polson

  • Cognitive walkthroughs: a method for theory-based evaluation of user interfaces

    Peter G. Polson;Clayton Lewis;John Rieman;Cathleen Wharton

  • Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces

    Clayton Lewis;Peter G. Polson;Cathleen Wharton;John Rieman

  • Making usable, useful, productivity-enhancing computer applications

    John D. Gould;Stephen J. Boies;Clayton Lewis

  • A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques

    Stephen Wehrend;Clayton Lewis

  • Cognitive walkthrough for the web

    Marilyn Hughes Blackmon;Peter G. Polson;Muneo Kitajima;Clayton Lewis

  • Theory-based design for easily learned interfaces

    Peter G. Polson;Clayton H. Lewis

  • Do algorithm animations assist learning?: an empirical study and analysis

    John Stasko;Albert Badre;Clayton Lewis

  • Learning to use word processors: problems and prospects

    Robert L. Mack;Clayton H. Lewis;John M. Carroll

  • TASK-CENTERED USER INTERFACE DESIGN A Practical Introduction

    Clayton Lewis;John Rieman

  • Designing for error

    Clayton Lewis;Donald A. Norman

  • Exploring exploring a word processor

    John M. Carroll;Robert L. Mack;Clayton H. Lewis;Nancy L. Grischkowsky

  • Why and how to learn why: Analysis-based generalization of procedures ☆

    Clayton Lewis

  • Interference with real world knowledge

    Clayton H. Lewis;John Robert Anderson

  • Learning to use a text processing system: Evidence from “thinking aloud” protocols

    Clayton Lewis;Robert Mack

  • Assistive technology for cognition [Understanding the Needs of Persons with Disabilities]

    E.F. LoPresti;C. Bodine;C. Lewis

  • Chapter 30 – Cognitive Walkthroughs

    Clayton Lewis

  • Spreadsheet-based interactive graphics: from prototype to tool

    Nicholas Wilde;Clayton Lewis

  • Can principles of cognition lower the barriers to programming

    Clayton Lewis;Gary Olson

  • Key Principles and What Designers Think

    John D. Gould;Clayton Lewis

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara A. Fox
Barbara A. Fox University of Colorado Boulder
Alexander Repenning
Alexander Repenning University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland
John M. Carroll
John M. Carroll University of Sussex
Paul Smolensky
Paul Smolensky Microsoft (United States)
Richard E. Ladner
Richard E. Ladner University of Washington
Shaun K. Kane
Shaun K. Kane Google (United States)
Dirk Grunwald
Dirk Grunwald University of Colorado Boulder
Benjamin G. Zorn
Benjamin G. Zorn Microsoft (United States)
Lorrie Faith Cranor
Lorrie Faith Cranor Carnegie Mellon University
John P. Kemp
John P. Kemp University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Clayton Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles