World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17343 16296 574 546 457 42838

Christophe Leclercq publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christophe Leclercq between 1967 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christophe Leclercq published across 60 years, from 1967 to 2026, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2021. 13 of the 568 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2021. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 25 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 39 publications 2018: 29 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 37 publications 2021: 44 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 29 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 9 publications 2026: 4 publications
1967 2026

568 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christophe Leclercq: publications per year, 1967 to 2026
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 4
1995 5
1996 6
1997 2
1998 6
1999 4
2000 10
2001 4
2002 13
2003 4
2004 10
2005 9
2006 14
2007 12
2008 16
2009 15
2010 17
2011 10
2012 25
2013 23
2014 19
2015 28
2016 39
2017 39
2018 29
2019 30
2020 37
2021 44
2022 23
2023 29
2024 23
2025 9
2026 4
Total 568
Download as CSV

Christophe Leclercq publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christophe Leclercq sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 457 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 457
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Christophe Leclercq D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christophe Leclercq sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Christophe Leclercq is affiliated with the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes in France and has a significant publication record primarily in the field of Medicine, with a special focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's work covers key topics within cardiology, with published studies on cardiac pacing and defibrillation, cardiac arrhythmias and treatments, cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias, and atrial fibrillation management and outcomes. Other research interests include cardiac structural anomalies and repair, cardiovascular function and risk factors, and heart failure treatment and management.

Leclercq has contributed to several notable publication venues where their research appears frequently. These include:

  • EP Europace
  • European Heart Journal
  • Heart Rhythm
  • Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases Supplements
  • Archives of cardiovascular diseases

Frequent co-authors in Leclercq's research include Raphaël P. Martins, Jean-Claude Deharo, Haran Burri, Éloi Marijon, and Vincent Galand.

Recent influential publications by Leclercq and collaborators include:

  • 2022 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death (2022, European Heart Journal)
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy (2021, European Heart Journal)
  • European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021 (2021, European Heart Journal)
  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy (2021, EP Europace)
  • How to use digital devices to detect and manage arrhythmias: an EHRA practical guide (2022, EP Europace)

Leclercq's publication output reflects a focus on clinical guidelines, cardiovascular disease statistics, and practical guidance relevant to arrhythmia detection and management. Their work also intersects with practical applications of digital health tools in cardiology.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Multisite Biventricular Pacing in Patients with Heart Failure and Intraventricular Conduction Delay

    S Cazeau;C Leclercq;T Lavergne;S Walker

  • 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk

    A Halliday;C Baigent;F Mach;B Mihaylova;B Mihaylova

  • 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy : The Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)

    Michele Brignole;Angelo Auricchio;Gonzalo Baron-Esquivias;Pierre Bordachar

  • Results of the Predictors of Response to CRT (PROSPECT) Trial

    Eugene S. Chung;Angel R. Leon;Luigi Tavazzi;Jing Ping Sun

  • Long-term benefits of biventricular pacing in congestive heart failure: results from the MUltisite STimulation in cardiomyopathy (MUSTIC) study

    Cecilia Linde;Christophe Leclercq;Steve Rex;Stephane Garrigue

  • 2020 ESC Guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease.

    Antonio Pelliccia;Sanjay Sharma;Sabiha Gati;Maria Bäck

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 2--issues during and after device implantation and unresolved questions.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Theodore Abraham;S. Serge Barold;Ole A. Breithardt

  • Retiming the failing heart: principles and current clinical status of cardiac resynchronization.

    Christophe Leclercq;David A. Kass

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy: Part 1--issues before device implantation.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Theodore Abraham;S. Serge Barold;Ole A. Breithardt

  • 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

    Michael Glikson;Jens Cosedis Nielsen;Mads Brix Kronborg;Yoav Michowitz

  • Comparative effects of permanent biventricular and right-univentricular pacing in heart failure patients with chronic atrial fibrillation.

    C. Leclercq;S. Walker;C. Linde;J. Clementy

  • Systolic improvement and mechanical resynchronization does not require electrical synchrony in the dilated failing heart with left bundle-branch block.

    Christophe Leclercq;Owen Faris;Richard Tunin;Jennifer Johnson

  • Echocardiographic evaluation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: ready for routine clinical use?: A critical appraisal

    Jeroen J Bax;Gerardo Ansalone;Ole A Breithardt;Genevieve Derumeaux

  • Permanent left ventricular pacing with transvenous leads inserted into the coronary veins.

    J C Daubert;P Ritter;H Le Breton;D Gras

  • 2012 EHRA/HRS expert consensus statement on cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure : implant and follow-up recommendations and management

    Jean-Claude Daubert;Leslie Saxon;Philip B. Adamson;Angelo Auricchio

  • Electrocardiographic predictive factors of long-term clinical improvement with multisite biventricular pacing in advanced heart failure.

    Christine Alonso;Christophe Leclercq;Frédéric Victor;Hassan Mansour

  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy in advanced heart failure the multicenter InSync clinical study.

    Daniel Gras;Christophe Leclercq;Anthony S.L. Tang;Cliff Bucknall

  • Cardiac dyssynchrony analysis using circumferential versus longitudinal strain: implications for assessing cardiac resynchronization.

    Robert H. Helm;Christophe Leclercq;Owen P. Faris;Cengizhan Ozturk

  • Regional Alterations in Protein Expression in the Dyssynchronous Failing Heart

    David D. Spragg;Christophe Leclercq;Morteza Loghmani;Owen P. Faris

  • Practical Instructions for the 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

Frequent Co-Authors

Otto A. Smiseth
Otto A. Smiseth Oslo University Hospital
Cecilia Linde
Cecilia Linde Karolinska University Hospital
Laurent Fauchier
Laurent Fauchier François Rabelais University
Gregory Y.H. Lip
Gregory Y.H. Lip University of Liverpool
Angelo Auricchio
Angelo Auricchio Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Gerasimos Filippatos
Gerasimos Filippatos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Giuseppe Boriani
Giuseppe Boriani University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Frederic Sacher
Frederic Sacher University of Bordeaux
Gerhard Hindricks
Gerhard Hindricks Leipzig University
Mathieu Pernot
Mathieu Pernot Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and flexible career paths in the healthcare sector. Many students consider online nursing programs due to their accessibility and lower costs, making them a popular stepping stone into advanced practice roles. When researching how much is online nursing school, prospective students will find that tuition rates can vary significantly depending on the institution and program level.

For those aiming to advance in their careers, enrolling in cheapest np school online is an affordable way to become a nurse practitioner, a high-demand specialization. Registered nurses seeking to boost their credentials often look for cheap rn to bsn online programs to conveniently upgrade their qualifications.

Those interested in leadership or research roles may consider an online nursing doctorate as a cost-effective pathway. Overall, online healthcare degrees provide flexible options for career advancement and are ideal for students balancing studies with work or family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Christophe Leclercq

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles