World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4827 4471 57 56 131 5956

Kim Lützén publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kim Lützén between 1990 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kim Lützén published across 31 years, from 1990 to 2020, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2000. 6 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2000. 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 9 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications
1990 2020

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kim Lützén: publications per year, 1990 to 2020
Year Publications
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 2
1994 3
1995 5
1996 2
1997 5
1998 3
1999 3
2000 9
2001 6
2002 7
2003 8
2004 4
2005 7
2006 4
2007 1
2008 9
2009 3
2010 5
2011 6
2012 6
2013 5
2014 2
2015 4
2016 6
2017 8
2018 3
2019 4
2020 2
Total 135
Download as CSV

Kim Lützén publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Lützén sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 131 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 131
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Kim Lützén D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kim Lützén sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Kim Lützén is affiliated with the Karolinska Institute in Sweden, contributing to interdisciplinary research at the intersection of health professions, medicine, and psychology.

Their research encompasses several closely related fields of study:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine
  • Psychology

Within these areas, their work further specializes in the following subfields:

  • General Health Professions
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
  • Clinical Psychology

The main topics addressed in Lützén's research involve ethical considerations and child healthcare, including:

  • Ethics in medical practice
  • Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Child Abuse and Trauma

Among published works, one notable paper is "Moral Challenges When Suspecting Abuse and Neglect in School Children: A Mixed Method Study" (2020), published in Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. This study highlights ethical dilemmas encountered in cases of suspected child abuse.

Lützén frequently collaborates with other researchers, including:

  • Maria Forsner
  • G. Elvhage
  • Béatrice Marianne Ewalds-Kvist

Publication venues favored for disseminating research findings include the Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, among others.

Best Publications

  • Developing the Concept of Moral Sensitivity in Health Care Practice

    Kim Lützén;Vera Dahlqvist;Sture Eriksson;Astrid Norberg

  • Moral stress, moral climate and moral sensitivity among psychiatric professionals

    Kim Lützén;Tammy Blom;Béatrice Ewalds-Kvist;Sarah Winch

  • Moral Stress: synthesis of a concept

    Kim Lützén;Agneta Cronqvist;Annabella Magnusson;Lars Andersson

  • Caring About - Caring For: moral obligations and work responsibilities in intensive care nursing

    Agneta Cronqvist;Töres Theorell;Tom Burns;Kim Lützén

  • The haemodialysis machine as a lifeline : experiences of suffering from end-stage renal disease.

    Birger Hagren;Inga-Märta Pettersen;Elisabeth Severinsson;Kim Lützén

  • Maintenance haemodialysis: patients' experiences of their life situation

    Birger Hagren;Inga-Märta Pettersen;Elisabeth Severinsson;Kim Lützén

  • Moral Sensitivity in Psychiatric Practice

    Kim Lützén;Mats Evertzon;Conny Nordin

  • Moral distress: a comparative analysis of theoretical understandings and inter-related concepts.

    Kim Lützén;Beatrice Ewalds Kvist

  • Moral Sensitivity: some differences between nurses and physicians

    Kim Lützén;Agneta Johansson;Gun Nordström

  • Moral sensitivity in nursing practice.

    Kim Lützén;Gun Nordström;Mats Evertzon

  • Development of the Perceptions of Conscience Questionnaire

    Vera Dahlqvist;Sture Eriksson;Ann-Louise Glasberg;Elisabeth Lindahl

  • Demographic factors associated with moral sensitivity among nursing students

    Hanna Tuvesson;Kim Lützén

  • Dissonant imperatives in nursing: a conceptualization of stress in intensive care in Sweden

    Agneta Cronqvist;Töres Theorell;Tom Burns;Kim Lützén

  • Family members' involvement in psychiatric care: experiences of the healthcare professionals' approach and feeling of alienation.

    Mats Ewertzon;Kim Lützén;Elisabeth Svensson;Birgitta Andershed

  • Nurses' experiences of research utilization within the framework of an educational programme.

    Kerstin Nilsson Kajermo;Gun Nordström;A. S. A. Krusebrant;Kim Lützen

  • Nurses as Guests or Professionals in Home Health Care

    Stina Öresland;Sylvia Määttä;Astrid Norberg;Marianne Winther Jörgensen

  • Experiences of ethical issues when caring for children with cancer.

    Cecilia Bartholdson;Kim Lützén;Klas Blomgren;Pernilla Pergert

  • Living a restricted life with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS).

    Britta Berglund;Gun Nordström;Kim Lützén

  • Transforming the exhausting to energizing process of being a good parent in the face of cancer.

    Eva Elmberger;Christina Bolund;Kim Lützén

  • Attempting to find meaning in illness to achieve emotional coherence: the experiences of patients with colorectal cancer.

    Ethel Ramfelt;Elisabeth Severinsson;Kim Lützén

Frequent Co-Authors

Klas Blomgren
Klas Blomgren Karolinska Institute
Astrid Norberg
Astrid Norberg Umeå University
Töres Theorell
Töres Theorell Karolinska Institute
Tom R. Burns
Tom R. Burns London Metropolitan University
Carol Tishelman
Carol Tishelman Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a variety of career pathways, from social work to psychology and behavioral analysis. Many students are now seeking flexible options that allow them to balance studies with work or personal commitments. To support these goals, universities across the USA offer diverse online programs tailored for different needs and budgets.

For those interested in a career in social work, there are cheap online msw programs designed to provide quality education at a lower cost. If you are looking for a fast-track option, some masters in social work accelerated programs can help you earn your degree in a shorter timeframe.

Students passionate about psychology may consider accelerated psychology programs online, which can quickly prepare you for roles in mental health, counseling, or research. For those aiming to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts, pursuing a bcba degree online is a smart pathway to enter this in-demand field.

Online degree pathways offer affordability, flexibility, and access to a range of rewarding careers in social sciences and humanities, empowering you to shape your own educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Kim Lützén

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles