World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
36
Citations
10302
World Ranking
9022
National Ranking
3230

Christina Schädel publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina Schädel sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 65 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Christina Schädel D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christina Schädel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Christina Schädel is affiliated with Northern Arizona University in the United States and has a research focus encompassing Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their work spans several subfields, including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, and Environmental Engineering.

The primary topics addressed in Schädel's research include:

  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Arctic and Antarctic ice dynamics

Recent scholarly contributions encompass a range of interdisciplinary studies. Notable publications are:

  • "Permafrost and Climate Change: Carbon Cycle Feedbacks From the Warming Arctic," 2022, Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • "The Boreal-Arctic Wetland and Lake Dataset (BAWLD)," 2021, Earth system science data
  • "An open-source database for the synthesis of soil radiocarbon data: International Soil Radiocarbon Database (ISRaD) version 1.0," 2020, Earth system science data
  • "Microbiome assembly in thawing permafrost and its feedbacks to climate," 2022, Global Change Biology
  • "Subsea permafrost carbon stocks and climate change sensitivity estimated by expert assessment," 2020, Environmental Research Letters

Schädel frequently collaborates with other researchers in the field, including Edward A. G. Schuur, Andrew D. Richardson, Susan M. Natali, Paul J. Hanson, and Benjamin W. Abbott.

Their publications appear regularly in scientific journals such as the Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), Earth system science data, Global Change Biology, and Nature Climate Change.

Best Publications

  • Climate change and the permafrost carbon feedback

    E. A. G. Schuur;A. D. McGuire;C. Schädel;C. Schädel;Guido Grosse

  • Beyond clay: Towards an improved set of variables for predicting soil organic matter content

    Craig Rasmussen;Katherine Heckman;William R. Wieder;Marco Keiluweit

  • Dependence of the evolution of carbon dynamics in the northern permafrost region on the trajectory of climate change.

    A. David McGuire;David M. Lawrence;Charles Koven;Joy S. Clein

  • Permafrost and Climate Change: Carbon Cycle Feedbacks From the Warming Arctic

    Unknown

  • Potential carbon emissions dominated by carbon dioxide from thawed permafrost soils

    Christina Schädel;Martin K.-F. Bader;Edward A.G. Schuur;Christina Biasi

  • Expert assessment of vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change

    E. A. G. Schuur;B. W. Abbott;W. B. Bowden;V. Brovkin

  • Deep Yedoma permafrost: A synthesis of depositional characteristics and carbon vulnerability

    Jens Strauss;Lutz Schirrmeister;Guido Grosse;Guido Grosse;Daniel Fortier

  • Circumpolar assessment of permafrost C quality and its vulnerability over time using long‐term incubation data

    Christina Schädel;Edward A. G. Schuur;Rosvel Bracho;Bo Elberling;Bo Elberling

  • Long-term CO 2 production following permafrost thaw

    Bo Elberling;Bo Elberling;Anders Michelsen;Christina Schädel;Edward A. G. Schuur

  • Direct observation of permafrost degradation and rapid soil carbon loss in tundra

    César Plaza;César Plaza;César Plaza;Elaine Pegoraro;Rosvel Bracho;Gerardo Celis

  • A simplified, data-constrained approach to estimate the permafrost carbon-climate feedback

    C.D Koven;E.A.G. Schuur;C Schädel;T. J Bohn

  • Quantification and monosaccharide composition of hemicelluloses from different plant functional types

    Christina Schädel;Andreas Blöchl;Andreas Richter;Günter Hoch

  • A pan-Arctic synthesis of CH 4 and CO 2 production from anoxic soil incubations

    Claire C. Treat;Susan M. Natali;Jessica Ernakovich;Colleen M. Iversen

  • Variability in the sensitivity among model simulations of permafrost and carbon dynamics in the permafrost region between 1960 and 2009

    A. David McGuire;Charles Koven;David M. Lawrence;Joy S. Clein

  • Microbiome assembly in thawing permafrost and its feedbacks to climate

    Unknown

  • Short-term dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates and hemicelluloses in young branches of temperate forest trees during bud break.

    Christina Schädel;Andreas Blöchl;Andreas Richter;Günter Hoch

  • The Boreal–Arctic Wetland and Lake Dataset (BAWLD)

    David Olefeldt;Mikael Hovemyr;McKenzie A. Kuhn;David Bastviken

  • Temperature sensitivity of organic matter decomposition of permafrost-region soils during laboratory incubations

    Rosvel Bracho;Susan Natali;Elaine Pegoraro;Elaine Pegoraro;Kathryn G. Crummer

  • Terrestrial C:N stoichiometry in response to elevated CO2 and N addition: a synthesis of two meta-analyses

    Yuanhe Yang;Yiqi Luo;Meng Lu;Christina Schädel

  • Adding Depth to Our Understanding of Nitrogen Dynamics in Permafrost Soils

    Verity G. Salmon;Christina Schädel;Rosvel Bracho;Elaine Pegoraro

  • Improving understanding of soil organic matter dynamics by triangulating theories, measurements, and models

    Joseph C. Blankinship;Asmeret Asefaw Berhe;Susan E. Crow;Jennifer L. Druhan

  • Nonlinear CO2 flux response to 7 years of experimentally induced permafrost thaw

    Marguerite Mauritz;Rosvel Bracho;Gerardo Celis;Jack Hutchings

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward A. G. Schuur
Edward A. G. Schuur Northern Arizona University
Susan M. Natali
Susan M. Natali Woods Hole Research Center
Vladimir E. Romanovsky
Vladimir E. Romanovsky University of Alaska Fairbanks
Merritt R. Turetsky
Merritt R. Turetsky University of Colorado Boulder
Gustaf Hugelius
Gustaf Hugelius Stockholm University
Guido Grosse
Guido Grosse Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research
Jennifer W. Harden
Jennifer W. Harden United States Geological Survey
Claire C. Treat
Claire C. Treat Aarhus University
Yiqi Luo
Yiqi Luo Cornell University
Rosvel Bracho
Rosvel Bracho University of Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is a broad field that intersects with various disciplines, opening diverse career opportunities. Many students choose to complement their studies with specialized programs such as a geographic information systems degree. This enables them to analyze spatial data crucial for environmental monitoring and management.

For those interested in leadership roles within public agencies or nonprofits, a 1 year mpa online program offers an accelerated pathway to public administration expertise, combining policy knowledge with environmental governance.

Social factors play a vital role in environmental challenges. Pursuing an online bachelors degree programs in sociology helps students understand human behavior and societal impacts on the environment, critical for community-based initiatives and sustainability projects.

For advanced professionals seeking flexible options, some may consider a doctorate degree online no dissertation to deepen their expertise without the traditional dissertation burden. Such programs often focus on applied research and leadership in environmental education and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Christina Schädel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles