World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
46
Citations
7611
World Ranking
6721
National Ranking
2914

Charles J. Heyser publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Heyser sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 73 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Charles J. Heyser D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Charles J. Heyser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Charles J. Heyser is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with notable work in subfields including Neurology, Reproductive Medicine, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's recent publications cover diverse topics in brain function, hormonal development, and substance use disorders. Key papers include:

  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, 2021, published in Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study, 2021, published in Nature Neuroscience
  • Rates of Incidental Findings in Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Children, 2021, published in JAMA Neurology
  • Alcohol Use Disorder: The Role of Medication in Recovery, 2021, published in Alcohol research
  • Substance use patterns in 9-10 year olds: Baseline findings from the adolescent brain cognitive development (ABCD) study, 2021, published in Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Their collaborative work frequently involves coauthors such as Megan M. Herting, Fiona C. Baker, Matthew D. Albaugh, Kara Bagot, and Marie T. Banich.

Heyser's research topics focus on:

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Their work has been published across a range of venues including Frontiers in Endocrinology, Nature Neuroscience, JAMA Neurology, Alcohol research, and Drug and Alcohol Dependence.

Best Publications

  • Neurocircuitry targets in ethanol reward and dependence.

    George F. Koob;Amanda J. Roberts;Gery Schulteis;Loren H. Parsons

  • Gain of Toxicity from ALS/FTD-Linked Repeat Expansions in C9ORF72 Is Alleviated by Antisense Oligonucleotides Targeting GGGGCC-Containing RNAs

    Jie Jiang;Jie Jiang;Qiang Zhu;Tania F. Gendron;Shahram Saberi

  • Progressive decline in avoidance learning paralleled by inflammatory neurodegeneration in transgenic mice expressing interleukin 6 in the brain

    Charles J. Heyser;Eliezer Masliah;Ana Samimi;Iain L. Campbell

  • Excessive ethanol drinking following a history of dependence: animal model of allostasis.

    Amanda J Roberts;Charles J Heyser;Maury Cole;Peter Griffin

  • mu-Opioid receptor knockout mice do not self-administer alcohol.

    Amanda J. Roberts;Jeffrey S. McDonald;Charles J. Heyser;Brigitte L. Kieffer

  • A description of the ABCD organizational structure and communication framework.

    Allison M. Auchter;Margie Hernandez Mejia;Charles J. Heyser;Paul D. Shilling

  • Hippocampal cell firing correlates of delayed-match-to-sample performance in the rat.

    Robert E. Hampson;Charles J. Heyser;Sam A. Deadwyler

  • Increased Ethanol Self‐Administration after a Period of Imposed Ethanol Deprivation in Rats Trained in a Limited Access Paradigm

    Charles J. Heyser;Gery Schulteis;George F. Koob

  • Central administration of an opiate antagonist decreases oral ethanol self-administration in rats.

    Charles J. Heyser;Amanda J. Roberts;Gery Schulteis;George F. Koob

  • Biospecimens and the ABCD study: Rationale, methods of collection, measurement and early data.

    Kristina A Uban;Megan K Horton;Joanna Jacobus;Charles Heyser

  • Assessment of developmental milestones in rodents.

    Charles J. Heyser

  • Chronic Acamprosate Eliminates the Alcohol Deprivation Effect While Having Limited Effects on Baseline Responding for Ethanol in Rats

    Charles J Heyser;Gery Schulteis;Philippe Durbin;George F Koob

  • Novel object exploration in mice: not all objects are created equal.

    Charles J. Heyser;Anthony Chemero

  • Prenatal cocaine exposure induces deficits in Pavlovian conditioning and sensory preconditioning among infant rat pups.

    Charles J. Heyser;Wei-Jung Chen;James Miller;Norman E. Spear

  • Transgenic models to assess the pathogenic actions of cytokines in the central nervous system.

    I L Campbell;A K Stalder;C S Chiang;R Bellinger

  • Opiate withdrawal signs precipitated by naloxone following a single exposure to morphine: potentiation with a second morphine exposure.

    Gery Schulteis;Charles J. Heyser;George F. Koob

  • Effects of naltrexone alone and in combination with acamprosate on the alcohol deprivation effect in rats.

    Charles J Heyser;Kelly Moc;George F Koob

  • Appoptosin-Mediated Caspase Cleavage of Tau Contributes to Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Pathogenesis

    Yingjun Zhao;Yingjun Zhao;I-Chu Tseng;Charles J. Heyser;Edward Rockenstein

  • A fostering study of the effects of prenatal cocaine exposure: I. Maternal behaviors

    Charles J. Heyser;Victor A. Molina;Linda Patia Spear

  • Baseline brain function in the preadolescents of the ABCD Study.

    B Chaarani;S Hahn;N Allgaier;S Adise

  • Correspondence Between Perceived Pubertal Development and Hormone Levels in 9-10 Year-Olds From the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study

    Megan M. Herting;Kristina A. Uban;Marybel Robledo Gonzalez;Marybel Robledo Gonzalez;Fiona C. Baker

  • Effects of prenatal exposure to cocaine on conditional discrimination learning in adult rats.

    Charles J. Heyser;Norman E. Spear;Linda P. Spear

  • Prenatal exposure to cocaine disrupts cocaine-induced conditioned place preference in rats

    Charles J. Heyser;James S. Miller;Norman E. Spear;Linda Patia Spear

Frequent Co-Authors

George F. Koob
George F. Koob National Institute on Drug Abuse
Linda P. Spear
Linda P. Spear Binghamton University
Norman E. Spear
Norman E. Spear Binghamton University
Amanda J. Roberts
Amanda J. Roberts Scripps Research Institute
Gery Schulteis
Gery Schulteis University of California, San Diego
Susan F. Tapert
Susan F. Tapert University of California, San Diego
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Amanda Sheffield Morris
Amanda Sheffield Morris Oklahoma State University
Joanna Jacobus
Joanna Jacobus University of California, San Diego
Terry L. Jernigan
Terry L. Jernigan University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience students have a variety of online education options to advance their careers or diversify their expertise. Whether you're interested in supplementing your neuroscience studies, switching fields, or moving into related sectors, online degrees and certifications can help set you apart.

For those aiming to boost specific skills or credentials quickly, online certification courses offer flexible and efficient pathways to high-paying roles across health, psychology, tech, and research industries. If you prefer a more streamlined academic route, exploring easy online degrees could be a practical solution to earning a degree while balancing work or personal commitments.

Many neuroscience graduates go on to apply their understanding of human behavior and brain science in fields like social work or behavior analysis. For these students, msw programs (Master of Social Work) provide a cost-effective, remote learning option. Alternatively, if you're interested in behavioral health, consider one of the bcba master's programs online to become a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Choosing the right online program can open doors to diverse career pathways based on your interests in neuroscience and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Charles J. Heyser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles