World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
35
Citations
9082
World Ranking
2153
National Ranking
124

Catherine Welch publications per year

1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 7 publications
1989 2025

128 publications in total across all disciplines

Catherine Welch publication distribution in Business and Management in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Welch sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 98 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Catherine Welch D-index placement in Business and Management in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Catherine Welch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Theorising from Case Studies: Towards a Pluralist Future for International Business Research

    Catherine Welch;Rebecca Piekkari;Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki;Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki

  • The Case Study as Disciplinary Convention Evidence From International Business Journals

    Rebecca Piekkari;Catherine Welch;Eriikka Paavilainen

  • Handbook of qualitative research methods for international business

    Rebecca Marschan-Piekkari;Catherine Welch

  • Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research

    Catherine Welch;Rebecca Marschan-Piekkari;Heli Penttinen;Marja Tahvanainen

  • ‘Good’ case research in industrial marketing: Insights from research practice

    Rebecca Piekkari;Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki;Catherine Welch

  • Crossing Language Boundaries: Qualitative Interviewing in International Business

    Catherine Welch;Rebecca Piekkari

  • Putting Process (Back) In: Research on the Internationalization Process of the Firm

    Catherine Welch;Eriikka Paavilainen-Mäntymäki

  • Translation in cross-language international business research: Beyond equivalence

    Agnieszka Chidlow;Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki;Catherine Welch

  • How should we (not) judge the ‘quality’ of qualitative research? A re-assessment of current evaluative criteria in International Business

    Catherine Welch;Rebecca Piekkari

  • Re-internationalisation: exploration and conceptualisation

    Catherine L. Welch;Lawrence S. Welch

  • Qualitative Research Methods in International Business: The State of the Art

    Rebecca Marschan-Piekkari;Catherine Welch

  • Rethinking the case study in international business and management research

    Rebecca Piekkari;Catherine Welch

  • The political embeddedness of international business networks

    Catherine Welch;Ian Wilkinson

  • Reconciling theory and context: How the case study can set a new agenda for international business research

    Unknown

  • The archaeology of business networks: the use of archival records in case study research

    Catherine Welch

  • Idea Logics and Network Theory in Business Marketing

    Catherine Welch;Ian Wilkinson

  • From Templates to Heuristics: How and Why to Move Beyond the Gioia Methodology:

    Jacqueline Mees-Buss;Catherine Welch;Catherine Welch;Rebecca Piekkari

  • Gender and Export Behaviour: Evidence from Women-Owned Enterprises

    Catherine L. Welch;Denice E. Welch;Lisa Hewerdine

  • Fifty Years of Methodological Trends in JIBS: Why Future IB Research Needs More Triangulation

    Bo Bernhard Nielsen;Bo Bernhard Nielsen;Catherine Welch;Catherine Welch;Agnieszka Chidlow;Stewart Robert Miller

  • The Internationalization Process Model Revisited: An Agenda for Future Research.

    Catherine Welch;Niina Nummela;Niina Nummela;Peter Liesch

Frequent Co-Authors

Denice E. Welch
Denice E. Welch University of Melbourne
Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki
Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki University of Leeds
Ian Wilkinson
Ian Wilkinson University of Sydney
Lawrence S. Welch
Lawrence S. Welch University of Melbourne
Peter W. Liesch
Peter W. Liesch University of Queensland
Bo Bernhard Nielsen
Bo Bernhard Nielsen University of Sydney
Sidney J. Gray
Sidney J. Gray University of Sydney
Joep Cornelissen
Joep Cornelissen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pejvak Oghazi
Pejvak Oghazi Södertörn University
Janne Tienari
Janne Tienari Hanken School of Economics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Catherine Welch

Recently Published Articles