World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
13187
World Ranking
7777
National Ranking
3361

William B. Dolan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William B. Dolan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 85 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

William B. Dolan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William B. Dolan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

William B. Dolan is currently affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their professional work is associated with this leading technology company, suggesting involvement in research or development activities linked to Microsoft's various domains.

Although there are no recent papers listed for William B. Dolan, the absence of publication data does not preclude experience or participation in significant projects or internal research efforts within their primary affiliation.

No information is available regarding frequent co-authors or regular publication venues, indicating either a focus on solo work, collaborative environments not captured in public databases, or contributions outside traditional academic publishing channels.

Data on book publications, including the number of books or publishers, is not present, which may imply that their contributions lie primarily within articles, reports, software development, or internal documentation rather than monographic works.

Details about the main fields of study, subfields, and specific research topics have not been disclosed. This lack restricts further insight into their specialized academic or technical focus areas.

There are no recorded awards associated with William B. Dolan, providing no indication of formal recognitions or honors in public records.

Best Publications

  • A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Models

    Jiwei Li;Michel Galley;Chris Brockett;Jianfeng Gao

  • Automatically Constructing a Corpus of Sentential Paraphrases.

    William B. Dolan;Chris Brockett

  • Unsupervised construction of large paraphrase corpora: exploiting massively parallel news sources

    Bill Dolan;Chris Quirk;Chris Brockett

  • Collecting Highly Parallel Data for Paraphrase Evaluation

    David Chen;William Dolan

  • Information retrieval utilizing semantic representation of text and based on constrained expansion of query words

    John J. Messerly;George E. Heidorn;Stephen D. Richardson;William B. Dolan

  • Data-Driven Response Generation in Social Media

    Alan Ritter;Colin Cherry;William B. Dolan

  • System for processing textual inputs using natural language processing techniques

    Simon H. Corston;William B. Dolan;Lucy H. Vanderwende;Lisa Braden-Harder

  • Monolingual Machine Translation for Paraphrase Generation

    Chris Quirk;Chris Brockett;William B. Dolan

  • Recognizing textual entailment: Rational, evaluation and approaches – Erratum

    Ido Dagan;Bill Dolan;Bernardo Magnini;Dan Roth

  • MindNet: Acquiring and Structuring Semantic Information from Text

    Stephen D. Richardson;William B. Dolan;Lucy Vanderwende

  • Unsupervised learning of paraphrase/translation alternations and selective application thereof

    Christopher Brockett;Eric Breck;William Dolan

  • Correcting ESL Errors Using Phrasal SMT Techniques

    Chris Brockett;William B. Dolan;Michael Gamon

  • System for identifying paraphrases using machine translation

    Christopher J. Brockett;William B. Dolan;Christopher B. Quirk

  • System and method for matching a textual input to a lexical knowledge base and for utilizing results of that match

    William B. Dolan;Michael Barnett;Stephen D. Richardson;Arul A. Menezes

  • deltaBLEU: A Discriminative Metric for Generation Tasks with Intrinsically Diverse Targets

    Michel Galley;Chris Brockett;Alessandro Sordoni;Yangfeng Ji

  • Using Contextual Speller Techniques and Language Modeling for ESL Error Correction

    Michael Gamon;Jianfeng Gao;Chris Brockett;Alexandre Klementiev

  • System for improving the performance of information retrieval-type tasks by identifying the relations of constituents

    Simon H. Corston-Oliver;William B. Dolan;Hisami Suzuki

  • Document summarizer for word processors

    Ronald A. Fein;William B. Dolan;John Messerly;Edward J. Fries

  • Language usage classifier

    Michael Gamon;William Dolan;Christopher Brockett

  • SemEval-2015 Task 1: Paraphrase and Semantic Similarity in Twitter (PIT)

    Wei Xu;Chris Callison-Burch;Bill Dolan

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Brockett
Chris Brockett Microsoft (United States)
Lucy Vanderwende
Lucy Vanderwende University of Washington
Michael Gamon
Michael Gamon Microsoft (United States)
Jianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao Microsoft (United States)
Chris Quirk
Chris Quirk Microsoft (United States)
Margaret Mitchell
Margaret Mitchell Hugging Face
Michael Auli
Michael Auli Facebook (United States)
Alan Ritter
Alan Ritter Georgia Institute of Technology
Michel Galley
Michel Galley Microsoft (United States)
Ruhi Sarikaya
Ruhi Sarikaya Amazon (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to diverse academic and career opportunities. Students frequently compare different majors in college to find the best fit for their skills, interests, and long-term goals within the ever-evolving tech sector.

Online education has made advanced degrees more accessible than ever. For those seeking a quicker transition or less intensive study, consider options like an easiest masters degree to get online. These programs often build relevant skills without requiring extensive time away from work or family.

Affordability is another key factor for aspiring professionals and academics. Pursuing one of the affordable phd programs online lets you gain a prestigious qualification with reduced financial pressure.

For education leaders or career changers aiming to accelerate their qualifications, 1 year edd programs online offer a fast-track route to leadership roles in the educational or corporate sector.

By weighing these pathways, students can customize their journey, ensuring both flexibility and alignment with career aspirations in the dynamic field of Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing William B. Dolan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles