World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
9556
World Ranking
7137
National Ranking
3127

Lucy Vanderwende publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucy Vanderwende sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 92 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Lucy Vanderwende D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lucy Vanderwende sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lucy Vanderwende is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans multiple intersecting fields, including Medicine, Health Professions, and Computer Science.

The work conducted by Vanderwende encompasses specialized subfields such as Family Practice, General Health Professions, and Artificial Intelligence. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in the topics they focus on, which include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills, Health Policy Implementation Science, and Machine Learning in Healthcare.

Their recent publication record includes a paper titled Predicting severe clinical events by learning about life-saving actions and outcomes using distant supervision, published in 2020 in the Journal of Biomedical Informatics. This paper has received citations reflecting engagement within the research community.

Collaborative relationships are evident in their frequent co-authors, including Dae Hyun Lee, Meliha Yetişgen, and Eric Horvitz, each contributing to multiple publications alongside Vanderwende.

Their publication venues highlight a focus on biomedical informatics, with the Journal of Biomedical Informatics being a notable outlet for their work.

  • Predicting severe clinical events by learning about life-saving actions and outcomes using distant supervision, 2020, Journal of Biomedical Informatics

  • Dae Hyun Lee
  • Meliha Yetişgen
  • Eric Horvitz

  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions
  • Computer Science

  • Family Practice
  • General Health Professions
  • Artificial Intelligence

  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Machine Learning in Healthcare

Best Publications

  • Apparatus and methods for an information retrieval system that employs natural language processing of search results to improve overall precision

    Lisa Braden-Harder;Simon H. Corston;William B. Dolan;Lucy H. Vanderwende

  • Exploring Content Models for Multi-Document Summarization

    Aria Haghighi;Lucy Vanderwende

  • A Corpus and Cloze Evaluation for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Stories

    Nasrin Mostafazadeh;Nathanael Chambers;Xiaodong He;Devi Parikh

  • System for processing textual inputs using natural language processing techniques

    Simon H. Corston;William B. Dolan;Lucy H. Vanderwende;Lisa Braden-Harder

  • Beyond SumBasic: Task-focused summarization with sentence simplification and lexical expansion

    Lucy Vanderwende;Hisami Suzuki;Chris Brockett;Ani Nenkova

  • Visual Storytelling

    Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang;Francis Ferraro;Nasrin Mostafazadeh;Ishan Misra

  • The Impact of Frequency on Summarization

    A. Nenkova;L. Vanderwende;Lucy Vanderwende

  • Generating Natural Questions About an Image

    Nasrin Mostafazadeh;Ishan Misra;Jacob Devlin;Margaret Mitchell

  • Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies

    Lucy Vanderwende;Hal Daumé;Katrin Kirchhoff

  • Enhancing Single-Document Summarization by Combining RankNet and Third-Party Sources

    Krysta Svore;Lucy Vanderwende;Christopher Burges

  • MindNet: Acquiring and Structuring Semantic Information from Text

    Stephen D. Richardson;William B. Dolan;Lucy Vanderwende

  • A compositional context sensitive multi-document summarizer: exploring the factors that influence summarization

    Ani Nenkova;Lucy Vanderwende;Kathleen McKeown

  • Powergrading: a Clustering Approach to Amplify Human Effort for Short Answer Grading

    Sumit Basu;Chuck Jacobs;Lucy Vanderwende

  • Multi-document summarization by maximizing informative content-words

    Wen-tau Yih;Joshua Goodman;Lucy Vanderwende;Hisami Suzuki

  • Learning the Visual Interpretation of Sentences

    C. Lawrence Zitnick;Devi Parikh;Lucy Vanderwende

  • Using Contextual Speller Techniques and Language Modeling for ESL Error Correction

    Michael Gamon;Jianfeng Gao;Chris Brockett;Alexandre Klementiev

  • A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Stories

    Nasrin Mostafazadeh;Nathanael Chambers;Xiaodong He;Devi Parikh

  • Joint Inference for Knowledge Extraction from Biomedical Literature

    Hoifung Poon;Lucy Vanderwende

  • Automatically Deriving Structured Knowledge Bases From On-Line Dictionaries

    Stephen D. Richardson;Lucy Vanderwende;William Dolan

  • Deep Questions without Deep Understanding

    Igor Labutov;Sumit Basu;Lucy Vanderwende

  • Visual Storytelling

    Ting-Hao;Huang;Francis Ferraro;Nasrin Mostafazadeh

Frequent Co-Authors

William B. Dolan
William B. Dolan Microsoft (United States)
Michel Galley
Michel Galley Microsoft (United States)
Chris Brockett
Chris Brockett Microsoft (United States)
Michael Gamon
Michael Gamon Microsoft (United States)
Sumit Basu
Sumit Basu Microsoft (United States)
Jianfeng Gao
Jianfeng Gao Microsoft (United States)
Pushmeet Kohli
Pushmeet Kohli DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Devi Parikh
Devi Parikh Facebook (United States)
James F. Allen
James F. Allen University of Rochester
Margaret Mitchell
Margaret Mitchell Hugging Face

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying computer science opens doors to a wide variety of in-demand career paths, many of which can be pursued through online education. As technology evolves, industries like cybersecurity, construction management, criminal justice, and accounting increasingly require professionals with technical know-how.

If you’re interested in cybersecurity, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest cybersecurity degree programs online. These programs can help you build essential skills in digital defense and information security at a more affordable cost.

For those looking at the intersection of technology and the built environment, a construction management degree online cost analysis can help you find affordable pathways to roles overseeing construction projects, budgets, and technology integration in modern construction.

If you’re thinking about combining tech skills with law enforcement or the legal system, check out the cheapest online master's degree in criminal justice. This degree prepares you for careers in digital forensics, cybersecurity law, and more.

Finally, expertise in technology is also highly valued within finance and accounting. Research the cost of accounting degree online to find flexible programs that combine digital tools with core business knowledge.

Best Scientists Citing Lucy Vanderwende

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles