World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 72 19752 18526 667 632 255 31331

Bernard Nordlinger publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernard Nordlinger between 1978 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernard Nordlinger published across 47 years, from 1978 to 2024, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2012. 1 of the 258 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2012. 1978: 3 publications 1979: 2 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 5 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1978 2024

258 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernard Nordlinger: publications per year, 1978 to 2024
Year Publications
1978 3
1979 2
1980 2
1981 2
1982 0
1983 1
1984 1
1985 5
1986 0
1987 4
1988 4
1989 3
1990 3
1991 3
1992 10
1993 4
1994 6
1995 4
1996 3
1997 4
1998 6
1999 0
2000 4
2001 6
2002 8
2003 4
2004 11
2005 16
2006 15
2007 13
2008 12
2009 10
2010 14
2011 6
2012 18
2013 9
2014 15
2015 8
2016 4
2017 4
2018 5
2019 1
2020 1
2021 3
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 258
Download as CSV

Bernard Nordlinger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Nordlinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 255 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545 255
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Bernard Nordlinger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard Nordlinger sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391 72
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bernard Nordlinger is affiliated with Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly within oncology, surgery, and hepatology. Their research spans multiple subfields including oncology, public health, environmental and occupational health, surgery, hepatology, and general health professions.

The scientist's primary research topics include colorectal cancer treatments and studies, hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and prognosis, global health and surgery, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, colorectal cancer surgical treatments, colorectal and anal carcinomas, and pancreatic and hepatic oncology research.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Bernard Nordlinger include the following:

  • "Pre- and Postoperative Capecitabine Without or With Oxaliplatin in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: PETACC 6 Trial by EORTC GITCG and ROG, AIO, AGITG, BGDO, and FFCD" (2020) published in Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • "Preoperative systemic chemotherapy alters the histopathological growth patterns of colorectal liver metastases" (2021) published in The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
  • "Shanghai international consensus on diagnosis and comprehensive treatment of colorectal liver metastases (version 2019)" (2020) published in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • "Rapport 24-03. Systèmes d'IA générative en santé: enjeux et perspectives" (2024) published in Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine
  • "Chirurgie et intelligence artificielle: c'est pour bientôt?" (2021) published in Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale

Bernard Nordlinger frequently collaborates with several co-authors, among whom are Murielle Mauer, Hans-Joachim Schmoll, Alexander Stein, Eric Van Cutsem, and Timothy Price.

The scientist has published in a range of academic venues, including:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • The Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
  • European Journal of Surgical Oncology
  • Bulletin de l Académie Nationale de Médecine
  • Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale

Their body of work addresses complex issues in colorectal cancer treatments, liver metastases, and the emerging interface of artificial intelligence with surgical techniques and healthcare systems. This multidisciplinary approach encompasses both clinical oncology and broader public health challenges.

Best Publications

  • ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making

    H J Schmoll;E Van Cutsem;A Stein;V Valentini

  • Perioperative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery versus surgery alone for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (EORTC 40983) : long-term results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

    Bernard Nordlinger;Halfdan Sorbye;Bengt Glimelius;Graeme J Poston

  • Early colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    R. Labianca;B. Nordlinger;G. D. Beretta;S. Mosconi

  • Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

    E. Van Cutsem;A. Cervantes;B. Nordlinger;D. Arnold

  • Prognostic role of KRAS and BRAF in stage II and III resected colon cancer: results of the translational study on the PETACC-3, EORTC 40993, SAKK 60-00 trial.

    Arnaud D. Roth;Sabine Tejpar;Mauro Delorenzi;Pu Yan

  • Neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for locally advanced cancer of the stomach and cardia: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer randomized trial 40954.

    Christoph Schuhmacher;Stephan Gretschel;Florian Lordick;Peter Reichardt

  • Preoperative radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment in rectal cancer. Final results of a randomized study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC).

    André Gerard;Marc Buyse;Bernard Nordlinger;Jean Loygue

  • Towards a pan-European consensus on the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases

    Eric Van Cutsem;Bernard Nordlinger;Rene Adam;Claus-Henning Köhne

  • Complete Response of Colorectal Liver Metastases After Chemotherapy: Does It Mean Cure?

    Stéphane Benoist;Antoine Brouquet;Christophe Penna;Catherine Julié

  • Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Trial of Sequential High-Dose Methotrexate, Fluorouracil, and Doxorubicin Versus Etoposide, Leucovorin, and Fluorouracil Versus Infusional Fluorouracil and Cisplatin in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group

    Udo Vanhoefer;Philippe Rougier;Hansjochen Wilke;Michel P. Ducreux

  • Multicenter randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folinic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial.

    Guillaume Portier;Dominique Elias;Olivier Bouche;Philippe Rougier

  • Local Treatment of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of a Randomized Phase II Trial

    Theo Ruers;Frits Van Coevorden;Cornelis J. A. Punt;Jean-Pierre E. N. Pierie

  • Randomized phase III trial comparing biweekly infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin alone or with irinotecan in the adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer: PETACC-3.

    Eric Van Cutsem;Roberto Labianca;György Bodoky;Carlo Barone

  • Advanced colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for treatment.

    E. Van Cutsem;B. Nordlinger;A. Cervantes

  • Radiofrequency ablation combined with systemic treatment versus systemic treatment alone in patients with non-resectable colorectal liver metastases: a randomized EORTC Intergroup phase II study (EORTC 40004)

    T. Ruers;C. Punt;F. Van Coevorden;J. P. E. N. Pierie

  • Primary colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, adjuvant treatment and follow-up

    R. Labianca;B. Nordlinger;G. D. Beretta;A. Brouquet

  • Combination of surgery and chemotherapy and the role of targeted agents in the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases: recommendations from an expert panel

    B. Nordlinger;E. Van Cutsem;T. Gruenberger;Bengt Glimelius;Bengt Glimelius

  • Does chemotherapy prior to liver resection increase the potential for cure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? A report from the European Colorectal Metastases Treatment Group

    Bernard Nordlinger;Eric Van Cutsem;Philippe Rougier;Claus Henning Köhne

  • OncoSurge: A Strategy for Improving Resectability With Curative Intent in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Graeme J. Poston;René Adam;Steven Alberts;Steven Curley

  • 6010 POSTER DISCUSSION Radiofrequency Ablation Combined With Systemic Treatment Versus Systemic Treatment Alone in Patients With Non- Resectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: a Randomized EORTC Intergroup Phase II Study (EORTC 40004)

    T. Ruers;C. Punt;F. van Coevorden;J. Ledermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Bengt Glimelius
Bengt Glimelius Uppsala University
Roberto Labianca
Roberto Labianca Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research
John R. Zalcberg
John R. Zalcberg Monash University
Peter M. Schlag
Peter M. Schlag Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Wolf O. Bechstein
Wolf O. Bechstein Goethe University Frankfurt
Daniel G. Haller
Daniel G. Haller University of Pennsylvania
Andrés Cervantes
Andrés Cervantes University of Valencia
Josep Tabernero
Josep Tabernero Vall d´Hebron Institute of Oncology
David Cunningham
David Cunningham Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA offers more than just the traditional MD route. Many students consider entry-level nursing degrees as accessible options. If you’re seeking a fast track, entry level msn programs online are a great way for non-nurses to transition into advanced nursing roles efficiently.

For those interested in less competitive admissions, you may wonder whats the easiest nursing program to get into?. Several schools offer flexible acceptance criteria for aspiring nurses. Alternatively, those wanting a pathway without standardized entrance tests can look for an lpn program no entrance exam.

If you prefer a non-clinical healthcare role, consider medical billing and coding. Plenty of medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid can help you enter this growing field at your own pace.

These online programs open the door to rewarding healthcare careers without the long commitment and competitive admissions of traditional medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard Nordlinger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles