World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Benjamin C.Y. Wong

Benjamin C.Y. Wong

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 17951 16873 207 201 290 25142

Benjamin C.Y. Wong publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin C.Y. Wong between 1993 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin C.Y. Wong published across 24 years, from 1993 to 2016, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2003. 2 of the 291 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2003. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 47 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 33 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 2 publications
1993 2016

291 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin C.Y. Wong: publications per year, 1993 to 2016
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 1
1997 4
1998 4
1999 2
2000 13
2001 16
2002 17
2003 47
2004 23
2005 16
2006 23
2007 21
2008 32
2009 33
2010 13
2011 10
2012 8
2013 3
2014 2
2015 0
2016 2
Total 291
Download as CSV

Benjamin C.Y. Wong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin C.Y. Wong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–300 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 290 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768 290
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Benjamin C.Y. Wong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin C.Y. Wong sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin C.Y. Wong is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China. Their academic career is associated with this institution, which is known for its research and education in various scientific disciplines.

There are no recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, main topics of work, or awards listed in the available data for Benjamin C.Y. Wong. Consequently, detailed information about specific research contributions, thematic focus, or collaborative efforts is not provided here.

Given the limited data, the profile focuses on the confirmed association with the University of Hong Kong in China but does not detail research outputs or scholarly impact.

Best Publications

  • Practice guidelines in acute pancreatitis.

    Peter A. Banks;Martin L. Freeman;Ronnie Fass;Darren S. Baroni

  • Helicobacter pylori eradication to prevent gastric cancer in a high-risk region of China: a randomized controlled trial.

    Benjamin Chun-Yu Wong;Shiu Kum Lam;Wai Man Wong;Jian Shun Chen

  • Lansoprazole for the prevention of recurrences of ulcer complications from long-term low-dose aspirin use

    Kam Chuen Lai;Shiu Kum Lam;Kent Man Chu;Benjamin C Y Wong

  • Independent risk factors and predictive score for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B

    Man-Fung Yuen;Yasuhito Tanaka;Daniel Yee-Tak Fong;James Fung

  • A Subpopulation of CD26+ Cancer Stem Cells with Metastatic Capacity in Human Colorectal Cancer

    Roberta Pang;Wai Lun Law;Andrew C.Y. Chu;Jensen T. Poon

  • Helicobacter pylori in developing countries. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guideline.

    R. H. Hunt;S. D. Xiao;F. Megraud;R. Leon-Barua

  • ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing

    Ikuo Hirano;Joel E. Richter;Ronnie Fass;Darren S. Baroni

  • Lamivudine is effective in suppressing hepatitis B virus DNA in Chinese hepatitis B surface antigen carriers: A placebo‐controlled trial

    C.-L. Lai;C.-K. Ching;A. K.-M. Tung;E. Li

  • Prevalence, clinical spectrum and health care utilization of gastro‐oesophageal reflux disease in a Chinese population: a population‐based study

    W. M. Wong;K. C. Lai;K. F. Lam;W. M. Hui

  • Promoter methylation of E-cadherin gene in gastric mucosa associated with Helicobacter pylori infection and in gastric cancer

    A. O.-O. Chan;S.-K. Lam;B. C.-Y. Wong;W.-M. Wong

  • Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use and the Risk of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Wei Hong Wang;Jia Qing Huang;Ge Fan Zheng;Shiu Kum Lam

  • Long-term lamivudine therapy reduces the risk of long-term complications of chronic hepatitis B infection even in patients without advanced disease.

    Man-Fung Yuen;Wai-Kay Seto;Danny Hoi-Fan Chow;Kit Tsui

  • Differences in Genotypes of Helicobacter pylori from Different Human Populations

    Dangeruta Kersulyte;Asish K. Mukhopadhyay;Billie Velapatiño;Billie Velapatiño;WanWen Su

  • Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Update

    Kwong Ming Fock;Nicholas J. Talley;Ronnie Fass;Khean Lee Goh

  • Anxiety but not depression determines health care-seeking behaviour in Chinese patients with dyspepsia and irritable bowel syndrome: a population-based study.

    W. H. C. Hu;W.-M. Wong;C. L. K. Lam;K. F. Lam

  • Functional p53 is required for triptolide-induced apoptosis and AP-1 and nuclear factor-kappaB activation in gastric cancer cells

    Xiao-Hua Jiang;Benjamin Chun-Yu Wong;Marie Chia-Mi Lin;Geng-Hui Zhu

  • World Gastroenterology Organisation global guideline: Constipation--a global perspective.

    Greger Lindberg;Saeed S. Hamid;Peter Malfertheiner;Ole Ostergaard Thomsen

  • Asian consensus report on functional dyspepsia

    Hiroto Miwa;Uday Chand Ghoshal;Kwong Ming Fock;Sutep Gonlachanvit

  • Suppression of Survivin Expression Inhibits in Vivo Tumorigenicity and Angiogenesis in Gastric Cancer

    Shui Ping Tu;Xiao Hua Jiang;Marie C. M. Lin;Jian Tao Cui

  • Pyogenic liver abscess: Retrospective analysis of 80 cases over a 10‐year period

    Wai-Man Wong;Benjamin Chun Yu Wong;Chee Kin Hui;Matthew Ng

Frequent Co-Authors

Man-Fung Yuen
Man-Fung Yuen University of Hong Kong
Hsiang-Fu Kung
Hsiang-Fu Kung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Ching-Lung Lai
Ching-Lung Lai University of Hong Kong
Liang Qiao
Liang Qiao University of Sydney
Ivan Hung
Ivan Hung University of Hong Kong
Hui Y. Lan
Hui Y. Lan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Suet Yi Leung
Suet Yi Leung University of Hong Kong
Siu Tsan Yuen
Siu Tsan Yuen University of Hong Kong
Douglas E. Berg
Douglas E. Berg Washington University in St. Louis
Nicholas J. Talley
Nicholas J. Talley University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a medical or healthcare career but seeking flexibility, there are several bsn to np programs online that can prepare you for advanced clinical roles such as nurse practitioner. These programs often allow you to balance work and study, making them a great choice for career advancement.

For those interested in leadership or administrative positions, an online master of health administration can open doors to managing hospitals, clinics, or other healthcare organizations. Choosing an affordable mha online program makes this goal accessible without a heavy financial burden.

Aspiring to the highest levels of nursing practice? Consider the cheapest dnp programs available online, which provide doctoral-level training at a lower cost.

Each of these pathways offers unique opportunities, whether you aim to work directly with patients or move into healthcare administration. Exploring your options can help you tailor your studies and achieve your career goals in the US healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin C.Y. Wong

Recently Published Articles