World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bengt Källén

Bengt Källén

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
28554
World Ranking
10173
National Ranking
195

Bengt Källén publications per year

1950: 6 publications 1951: 2 publications 1952: 0 publications 1953: 8 publications 1954: 1 publications 1955: 1 publications 1956: 2 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 3 publications 1960: 7 publications 1961: 4 publications 1962: 5 publications 1963: 1 publications 1964: 4 publications 1965: 1 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 4 publications 1969: 4 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 4 publications 1972: 1 publications 1973: 4 publications 1974: 2 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 7 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 3 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 1 publications 1982: 7 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 7 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 30 publications 2015: 1 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publications 2019: 36 publications
1950 2019

434 publications in total across all disciplines

Bengt Källén publication distribution in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Bengt Källén sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 415 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bengt Källén D-index placement in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Bengt Källén sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bengt Källén was affiliated with Lund University in Sweden during their academic career. The scientist contributed to research without detailed public records of their specific papers or academic fields readily available from the provided data.

No recorded recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues are associated with Bengt Källén according to the data. Similarly, there are no listed publications in terms of books or notable research topics.

Due to the absence of detailed records of their contributions, it is not possible to describe the specific areas of study or subfields within which Bengt Källén worked.

There is no documented information about awards or recognitions received by Bengt Källén. The data also confirms that the scientist is deceased, which frames all information in the past tense.

The available data provides a limited overview without specifics on research output, collaborative networks, or thematic focus areas. The institutional affiliation at Lund University in Sweden remains a verifiable element of their academic background.

Best Publications

  • A Quality Study of a Medical Birth Registry

    Sven Cnattingius;Anders Ericson;Jan Gunnarskog;Bengt Källén

  • Congenital malformations among infants whose mothers had gestational diabetes or preexisting diabetes.

    Anders E Åberg;Lena Westbom;Bengt Källén

  • Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: A registry study of 5405 cases

    R.I. Mazze;B. Kallen

  • Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI

    U.-B. Wennerholm;C. Bergh;L. Hamberger;K. Lundin

  • Delivery outcome after maternal use of antidepressant drugs in pregnancy: an update using Swedish data

    Margareta Reis;B Kallen

  • Neonate Characteristics After Maternal Use of Antidepressants in Late Pregnancy

    Bengt Källén

  • Delivery outcome after the use of antidepressants in early pregnancy.

    A. Ericson;B. Källén;B.-E. Wiholm

  • The Swedish Medical Birth Register - a summary of content and quality

    Bengt Källén;Karin Källén

  • Major malformations in infants exposed to antiepileptic drugs in utero, with emphasis on carbamazepine and valproic acid: a nation‐wide, population‐based register study

    K Wide;B Winbladh;Bengt Källén

  • Maternal use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in early pregnancy and infant congenital malformations.

    Bengt A. J. Källén;Petra Otterblad Olausson

  • VALPROIC ACID AND SPINA BIFIDA

    Tor Bjerkedal;Andrew Czeizel;Janine Goujard;Bengt Kallen

  • Appendectomy during pregnancy: a Swedish registry study of 778 cases.

    R I Mazze;B Källén

  • In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: Risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods

    Bengt Källén;Orvar Finnström;Karl Gösta Nygren;Petra Otterblad Olausson

  • Major congenital malformations in Down syndrome.

    Bengt Källén;Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo;Elisabeth Robert

  • The epidemiology of anotia and microtia.

    J Harris;B Källén;E Robert

  • Congenital malformations after the use of inhaled budesonide in early pregnancy

    Bengt Källén;Hakan Rydhstroem;Anders Åberg

  • Use of benzodiazepines and benzodiazepine receptor agonists during pregnancy: neonatal outcome and congenital malformations.

    Birgitta Norstedt Wikner;Carl-Olav Stiller;Ulf Bergman;Charlotte Asker

  • Maternal use of antipsychotics in early pregnancy and delivery outcome.

    Margareta Reis;Bengt Källén

  • Maternal drug use in early pregnancy and infant cardiovascular defect.

    Bengt A J Källén;Petra Otterblad Olausson

  • Maternal use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn.

    Bengt Källén;Petra Otterblad Olausson

Frequent Co-Authors

Gisela Dahlquist
Gisela Dahlquist Umeå University
Giorgio Sandrini
Giorgio Sandrini University of Pavia
Gaetano Finocchiaro
Gaetano Finocchiaro Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Karel Marsal
Karel Marsal Lund University
Paul Lichtenstein
Paul Lichtenstein Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career path doesn’t always require traditional, in-person study. Today, students can access a variety of online healthcare programs that offer flexibility, affordability, and industry-relevant skills. Options range from entry-level certifications to advanced doctoral degrees, creating a broad selection for those interested in medicine and nursing.

For individuals seeking a quicker and more cost-effective entry point into healthcare, medical coding is a popular choice. Learn more about how much does it cost to become a medical coder through accredited online courses. These programs often take less time to complete and can lead directly to in-demand job opportunities.

Nursing remains one of the most versatile and sought-after professions in the US. If you’re interested in becoming a registered nurse or advancing your credentials, review different online nursing courses and their cost-effectiveness. For those aiming higher, there are affordable np programs and even the cheapest online dnp programs available to support your academic and professional growth.

Online degrees pave the way for a variety of stable and rewarding healthcare careers. Carefully compare your options to find the right fit for your budget and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Bengt Källén

Recently Published Articles