World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 38 5775 35 106 14504

Ayala M. Pines publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ayala M. Pines between 1972 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ayala M. Pines published across 46 years, from 1972 to 2017, averaging 2.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2013. 9 of the 107 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2013. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 3 publications 1981: 7 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 3 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 1 publication
1972 2017

107 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ayala M. Pines: publications per year, 1972 to 2017
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 2
1977 4
1978 5
1979 1
1980 3
1981 7
1982 5
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 2
1992 2
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 2
2001 2
2002 7
2003 5
2004 4
2005 3
2006 1
2007 1
2008 1
2009 3
2010 1
2011 2
2012 2
2013 11
2014 4
2015 0
2016 8
2017 1
Total 107
Download as CSV

Ayala M. Pines publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ayala M. Pines sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 106 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 106
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Ayala M. Pines D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ayala M. Pines sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278 38
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Ayala M. Pines was affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel during their academic career. Their work and research contributions were associated with this institution.

Throughout their career, they did not have published papers listed in the provided data, nor documented frequent co-authors or typical publication venues. Similarly, there were no recorded book publications, specific fields or subfields of study, or distinct main topics of work available in the provided information.

There are no records of awards won or specific recognitions attributed to this scientist in the data provided.

The absence of detailed publication records, co-author collaborations, and research topics limits the scope of a comprehensive academic profile based on the available information. However, their association with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev indicates that their professional activity was connected to this research environment.

Best Publications

  • Career burnout: Causes and cures.

    Ayala M. Pines;Elliot Aronson

  • BURNOUT: FROM TEDIUM TO PERSONAL GROWTH

    Ayala Malach Pines;Elliot Aronson

  • Characteristics of staff burnout in mental health settings.

    Ayala Pines;Christina Maslach

  • The burn-out syndrome in the day care setting

    Christina Maslach;Ayala Pines

  • Burnout: An Existential Perspective

    Ayala M. Pines

  • Sexual child abuse as an antecedent to prostitution

    Mimi H. Silbert;Ayala M. Pines

  • Stress and burnout: The significant difference.

    Ayala Malach Pines;Giora Keinan

  • Occupational tedium in the social services

    Ayala Pines;Ditsa Kafry

  • Job Burnout and Couple Burnout in Dual-earner Couples in the Sandwiched Generation:

    Ayala Malach Pines;Margaret B. Neal;Leslie B. Hammer;Tamar Icekson

  • Gender differences in entrepreneurship: Equality, diversity and inclusion in times of global crisis

    Ayala Malach Pines;Miri Lerner;Dafna Schwartz

  • Nurses' Burnout: Lack of Positive Conditions and Presence of Negative Conditions as Two Independent Sources of Stress

    Ayala M Pines;Allen D Kanner

  • Teacher Burnout: A psychodynamic existential perspective

    Ayala Malach Pines

  • Early Sexual Exploitation as an Influence in Prostitution

    Mimi H. Silbert;Ayala M. Pines

  • Conspicuous in its absence: the lack of positive conditions as a source of stress.

    Allen D. Kanner;Ditsa Kafry;Ayala Pines

  • Sex and Culture in Burnout and Coping among Human Service Professionals A Social Psychological Perspective

    Dalia Etzion;Ayala Pines

  • Antecedents, correlates, and consequences of sexual jealousy

    Ayala M. Pines;Elliot Aronson

  • A Cross-Cultural Investigation of Social Support and Burnout

    Ayala Malach Pines;Adital Ben-Ari;Agnes Utasi;Dale Larson

  • Combatting staff burn-out in a day care center: A case study

    Ayala Pines;Christina Maslach

  • Adult attachment styles and their relationship to burnout: a preliminary, cross-cultural investigation

    Unknown

  • Entrance into Prostitution

    Mimi H. Silbert;Ayala M. Pines

  • Victimization of street prostitutes.

    Mimi H. Silbert;Ayala M. Pines

Frequent Co-Authors

Elliot Aronson
Elliot Aronson University of California, Santa Cruz
Christina Maslach
Christina Maslach University of California, Berkeley
Dov Dvir
Dov Dvir Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Leslie B. Hammer
Leslie B. Hammer Oregon Health & Science University
Giora Keinan
Giora Keinan Tel Aviv University
Todd Bodner
Todd Bodner Portland State University
Sylvia Guendelman
Sylvia Guendelman University of California, Berkeley
Aaron J. Shenhar
Aaron J. Shenhar Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in social sciences and humanities grows, a variety of flexible online programs are opening pathways to in-demand careers. Students seeking foundational knowledge often begin with online degrees in psychology. These programs offer affordability and versatility, preparing graduates for roles in counseling, community outreach, or further graduate study.

For those passionate about social work, pursuing one of the online msw programs can lead to licensure and positions in healthcare, education, or case management. Flexibility in online study enables students to balance current job or family commitments.

More specialized tracks are also available. Students interested in clinical psychology can explore the psyd online route, which focuses on hands-on practice and prepares graduates for professional therapy or counseling settings.

Aspiring marriage and family therapists might consider the mft programs, designed for those who wish to more quickly enter mental health fields working with couples and families.

With these diverse online degree options, students can tailor their education to match specific career goals while enjoying the flexibility and accessibility of remote learning.

Best Scientists Citing Ayala M. Pines