World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Antoine C. G. Egberts

Antoine C. G. Egberts

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17628 16569 664 642 340 21387

Antoine C. G. Egberts publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antoine C. G. Egberts between 1994 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antoine C. G. Egberts published across 28 years, from 1994 to 2021, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2007. 5 of the 367 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2007. 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 16 publications 2002: 23 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 25 publications 2005: 18 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 41 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 34 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications
1994 2021

367 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antoine C. G. Egberts: publications per year, 1994 to 2021
Year Publications
1994 3
1995 0
1996 4
1997 10
1998 3
1999 9
2000 7
2001 16
2002 23
2003 20
2004 25
2005 18
2006 24
2007 41
2008 32
2009 34
2010 23
2011 10
2012 5
2013 14
2014 12
2015 8
2016 7
2017 0
2018 10
2019 4
2020 2
2021 3
Total 367
Download as CSV

Antoine C. G. Egberts publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine C. G. Egberts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 340 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 340
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Antoine C. G. Egberts D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antoine C. G. Egberts sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Surgery

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Internal medicine, Odds ratio, Pediatrics, Drug and Epidemiology. His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Diabetes mellitus and Psychiatry. His Odds ratio research incorporates elements of Anesthesia, Confidence interval, Prospective cohort study and Risk factor.

As a part of the same scientific study, Antoine C. G. Egberts usually deals with the Risk factor, concentrating on Case-control study and frequently concerns with Comorbidity and Surgery. The study incorporates disciplines such as Medical prescription, Population study and Emergency medicine in addition to Pediatrics. He has included themes like Platelet activation and Public health in his Epidemiology study.

His most cited work include:

  • Frequency of and Risk Factors for Preventable Medication-Related Hospital Admissions in the Netherlands (567 citations)
  • A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions. (527 citations)
  • Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: A comparison of doctors, nurses and patients as sources of reports (465 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Internal medicine, Psychiatry, Pediatrics, Medical prescription and Pharmacology. His study in Internal medicine focuses on Odds ratio in particular. His Odds ratio study incorporates themes from Anesthesia, Risk factor and Confidence interval.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Psychiatry, Cohort are connected with Cohort study and other disciplines. His work investigates the relationship between Pediatrics and topics such as Epidemiology that intersect with problems in Public health. His studies deal with areas such as Pharmacy, Logistic regression and Emergency medicine as well as Medical prescription.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (32.22%)
  • Psychiatry (19.15%)
  • Pediatrics (18.24%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?

  • Pharmacy (19.15%)
  • Internal medicine (32.22%)
  • Emergency medicine (10.03%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Pharmacy, Internal medicine, Emergency medicine, Family medicine and Medical prescription. When carried out as part of a general Pharmacy research project, his work on Pharmacist and Hospital pharmacy is frequently linked to work in Documentation, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study. Antoine C. G. Egberts combines subjects such as Diabetes mellitus and Oncology with his study of Internal medicine.

His Diabetes mellitus study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Confounding, Psychiatry, Case-control study and Antipsychotic. The concepts of his Medical prescription study are interwoven with issues in Liver function, Remote patient monitoring and Discontinuation. His Logistic regression research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Odds ratio and Confidence interval.

Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Risk of Lactic Acidosis or Elevated Lactate Concentrations in Metformin Users With Renal Impairment: A Population-Based Cohort Study (91 citations)
  • Antidepressant prescribing in five European countries: application of common definitions to assess the prevalence, clinical observations, and methodological implications (86 citations)
  • Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis (85 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Disease
  • Surgery

His primary areas of study are Medical prescription, Emergency medicine, Internal medicine, Psychological intervention and Pharmacy. His Medical prescription research includes themes of Medication use and Time trends. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Medical history, Potentially Inappropriate Medication List, Polypharmacy, Nested case-control study and Comorbidity.

Internal medicine is closely attributed to Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in his work. His Psychological intervention research focuses on Post-hoc analysis and how it connects with Randomized controlled trial and Pharmacist. His work deals with themes such as Glucocorticoid, Population study, Osteoporosis, Physical therapy and Rheumatology, which intersect with Pharmacy.

Best Publications

  • A comparison of measures of disproportionality for signal detection in spontaneous reporting systems for adverse drug reactions.

    Eugène P van Puijenbroek;Andrew Bate;Andrew Bate;Hubert G M Leufkens;Marie Lindquist

  • Frequency of and Risk Factors for Preventable Medication-Related Hospital Admissions in the Netherlands

    Anne J. Leendertse;Antoine C. G. Egberts;Lennart J. Stoker;Patricia M. L. A. van den Bemt;Patricia M. L. A. van den Bemt

  • Adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: A comparison of doctors, nurses and patients as sources of reports

    P. M. L. A. van den Bemt;A. C. G. Egberts;A. W. Lenderink;J. M. Verzijl

  • The Risk of Cancer in Users of Statins

    Matthijs R. Graaf;Annette B. Beiderbeck;Antoine C.G. Egberts;Dick J. Richel

  • Use of oral glucocorticoids and risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in a population based case–control study

    P C Souverein;A Berard;T P Van Staa;C Cooper

  • Psychoactive substance use and the risk of motor vehicle accidents

    K.L.L. Movig;M.P.M. Mathijssen;P.H.A. Nagel;T. van Egmond

  • The Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry on Medication Prescription Errors and Clinical Outcome in Pediatric and Intensive Care: A Systematic Review

    Floor van Rosse;Barbara Maat;Carin M A Rademaker;Adrianus J van Vught

  • Safety-Related Regulatory Actions for Biologicals Approved in the United States and the European Union

    Thijs J. Giezen;Aukje K. Mantel-Teeuwisse;Sabine M. J. M. Straus;Huub Schellekens

  • Association of Risk of Abnormal Bleeding With Degree of Serotonin Reuptake Inhibition by Antidepressants

    Welmoed E. E. Meijer;Eibert R. Heerdink;Willem A. Nolen;Ron M. C. Herings

  • Causal or casual? The role of causality assessment in pharmacovigilance

    R.H.B. Meyboom;Y.A. Hekster;A.C.G. Egberts;F.W.J. Gribnau

  • Relationship between polypharmacy and underprescribing.

    Mascha A. J. Kuijpers;Rob J. van Marum;Antoine C. G. Egberts;Paul A. F. Jansen

  • Use of antiepileptic drugs and risk of fractures Case–control study among patients with epilepsy

    P C Souverein;D J Webb;J G Weil;T P Van Staa

  • Principles of Signal Detection in Pharmacovigilance

    R.H.B. Meyboom;A.C.G. Egberts;I.R. Edwards;Y.A. Hekster

  • Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis

    Imke H. Bartelink;Arief Lalmohamed;Elisabeth M L van Reij;Christopher C. Dvorak

  • Antipsychotic Drug Use and Risk of Pneumonia in Elderly People

    Wilma Knol;Rob J. Van Marum;Paul A. F. Jansen;Patrick C. Souverein

  • Effects of hypothermia on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies.

    Marcel P. H. van den Broek;Floris Groenendaal;Antoine C. G. Egberts;Carin M. A. Rademaker

  • Relationship of serotonergic antidepressants and need for blood transfusion in orthopedic surgical patients.

    Kris L. L. Movig;Michiel W. H. E. Janssen;Jan de Waal Malefijt;Peter J. Kabel

  • VKORC1 and CYP2C9 genotypes and acenocoumarol anticoagulation status: interaction between both genotypes affects overanticoagulation.

    Tom Schalekamp;Bjorn P Brassé;Janine F M Roijers;Youssef Chahid

  • An ABC of drug-related problems.

    Ronald H.B. Meyboom;Marie Lindquist;Antoine C.G. Egberts

  • The relationship between benzodiazepine use and traffic accidents: A systematic literature review.

    Beitske E. Smink;Antoine C. G. Egberts;Klaas J. Lusthof;Donald R. A. Uges;Donald R. A. Uges

Frequent Co-Authors

Hubert G. M. Leufkens
Hubert G. M. Leufkens Utrecht University
Willem A. Nolen
Willem A. Nolen University Medical Center Groningen
Diederick E. Grobbee
Diederick E. Grobbee Utrecht University
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton
Henk-Jan Guchelaar
Henk-Jan Guchelaar Leiden University Medical Center
Robbert G. M. Bredius
Robbert G. M. Bredius Leiden University Medical Center
Meindert Danhof
Meindert Danhof Leiden University
Hans Scheffer
Hans Scheffer Radboud University
Henk Nijman
Henk Nijman Radboud University
Barbara Franke
Barbara Franke Radboud University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a career in medicine or healthcare, many students explore dynamic alternatives to traditional medical school. Online nursing degrees are an increasingly popular choice. For those seeking a flexible and cost-effective start, affordable nursing programs offer entry into the healthcare profession without the high tuition costs.

Registered Nurses (RNs) hoping to advance their careers can enroll in the cheapest rn to bsn program online to obtain a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, opening up new job opportunities and leadership roles. For those interested in graduate-level study, pursuing a phd in nursing online programs may lead to careers in research, education, or advanced practice.

Non-nurses with a bachelor’s degree in another field can transition into nursing through direct entry msn programs. These programs are designed for career changers eager to join the healthcare workforce quickly and efficiently.

Exploring these online pathways can help you decide which educational route aligns best with your goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Antoine C. G. Egberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles