World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
47
Citations
9237
World Ranking
4401
National Ranking
1538

Anthony W. King publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony W. King sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 98 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Anthony W. King D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anthony W. King sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anthony W. King is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States and has an extensive publication record in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Ophthalmology. Their research primarily addresses glaucoma and retinal disorders, contributing significantly to the understanding and treatment of these conditions.

King's notable recent papers include:

  • Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgical Techniques for Open-Angle Glaucoma (2021), published in JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Primary trabeculectomy for advanced glaucoma: pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial (TAGS) (2021), published in BMJ
  • One-year surgical outcomes of the PreserFlo MicroShunt in glaucoma: a multicentre analysis (2022), published in British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Fast news or fake news? (2020), published in EMBO Reports
  • European Glaucoma Society - A guide on surgical innovation for glaucoma (2023), published in British Journal of Ophthalmology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Augusto Azuara-Blanco
  • James Kirwan
  • Francesco Oddone
  • Keith Barton
  • Graeme MacLennan

King often publishes in these venues:

  • Eye
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • Advances in Therapy
  • Nature
  • EMBO Reports

The main fields of study covered by King's work include Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Ophthalmology. They also contribute to subfields such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Epidemiology.

Key research topics addressed include:

  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Ocular Surface and Contact Lens

Best Publications

  • The global carbon cycle.

    Wilfred M. Post;Tsung-Hung Peng;William R. Emanuel;Anthony W. King

  • A hierarchical framework for the analysis of scale

    R. V. O'Neill;A. R. Johnson;A. W. King

  • Aggregating Fine-Scale Ecological Knowledge to Model Coarser-Scale Attributes of Ecosystems

    Edward B. Rastetter;Anthony W. King;Bernard J. Cosby;George M. Hornberger

  • Extinction Thresholds for Species in Fractal Landscapes

    Anthony W. King

  • OAK FOREST CARBON AND WATER SIMULATIONS: MODEL INTERCOMPARISONS AND EVALUATIONS AGAINST INDEPENDENT DATA

    P. J. Hanson;J. S. Amthor;S. D. Wullschleger;K. B. Wilson

  • Impact of large‐scale climate extremes on biospheric carbon fluxes: An intercomparison based on MsTMIP data

    Jakob Zscheischler;Jakob Zscheischler;Anna M. Michalak;Christopher Schwalm;Miguel D. Mahecha

  • Dispersal success on spatially structured landscapes: when do spatial pattern and dispersal behavior really matter?

    Anthony W King

  • The North American Carbon Program Multi-Scale Synthesis and Terrestrial Model Intercomparison Project – Part 1: Overview and experimental design

    D. N. Huntzinger;C. Schwalm;A. M. Michalak;K. Schaefer

  • Uncertainty in the response of terrestrial carbon sink to environmental drivers undermines carbon-climate feedback predictions.

    D. N. Huntzinger;A. M. Michalak;C. Schwalm;C. Schwalm;P. Ciais

  • Radial variation in sap velocity as a function of stem diameter and sapwood thickness in yellow-poplar trees

    Stan D. Wullschleger;Anthony W. King

  • The Use and Misuse of Neutral Landscape Models in Ecology

    Anthony W. King

  • Dispersal success on fractal landscapes: a consequence of lacunarity thresholds

    Anthony W. King

  • Fast labile carbon turnover obscures sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration from soil to temperature: A model analysis

    Lianhong Gu;Wilfred M. Post;Anthony W. King

  • The Potential Response of Terrestrial Carbon Storage to Changes in Climate and Atmospheric CO2

    Anthony W. King;Wilfred M. Post;Stan D. Wullschleger

  • Boreal forest CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration predicted by nine ecosystem process models: Intermodel comparisons and relationships to field measurements

    Jeffrey S Amthor;J M Chen;Joy S Clein;Steve Frolking

  • The first state of the carbon cycle report (SOCCR): The North American carbon budget and implications for the global carbon cycle.

    A. W. King;L. Dilling;G. P. Zimmerman;D. M. Fairman

  • COMPLEXITY, DIVERSITY, AND STABILITY: A RECONCILIATION OF THEORETICAL AND EMPIRICAL RESULTS

    Anthony W. King;Stuart L. Pimm

  • Plant Respiration in a Warmer World

    Anthony W. King;Carla A. Gunderson;Wilfred M. Post;David J. Weston

  • Analysis of landscape sources and sinks: the effect of spatial pattern on avian demography

    Anthony W. King

  • Disentangling climatic and anthropogenic controls on global terrestrial evapotranspiration trends

    Jiafu Mao;Wenting Fu;Xiaoying Shi;Daniel M. Ricciuto

  • Remaining large grasslands may not be sufficient to prevent grassland bird declines

    Anthony W. King;William E. Jensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Wilfred M. Post
Wilfred M. Post University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Daniel M. Ricciuto
Daniel M. Ricciuto Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Peter E. Thornton
Peter E. Thornton Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Benjamin Poulter
Benjamin Poulter Goddard Space Flight Center
Xiaoying Shi
Xiaoying Shi Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Deborah N. Huntzinger
Deborah N. Huntzinger Northern Arizona University
Atul K. Jain
Atul K. Jain University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Robert B. Cook
Robert B. Cook Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Jiafu Mao
Jiafu Mao Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Stan D. Wullschleger
Stan D. Wullschleger Oak Ridge National Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields, especially as the demand for online education grows. Students interested in blending science and human behavior can pursue specialized paths, such as highest paying forensic psychology jobs. This niche links ecological knowledge and forensic science, offering lucrative opportunities for those wanting to make a significant impact.

For those passionate about supporting young people, an online masters child psychology program can provide valuable skills. These courses are designed for remote learning and focus on development and behavioral issues in children and adolescents.

If you're considering a counselor role, an online master's in counseling helps prepare graduates to support mental well-being, often drawing upon ethical and ecological considerations within therapy.

Finally, earning credentials through clinical psychology master's programs online can lead to careers in assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of mental health issues. These pathways integrate scientific research methods—often applied in ecological studies—into clinical practices.

Best Scientists Citing Anthony W. King

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles