World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alireza Keshavarz

Alireza Keshavarz

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 65 1577 1497 92 89 254 12395

Alireza Keshavarz publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alireza Keshavarz between 2003 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alireza Keshavarz published across 24 years, from 2003 to 2026, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2022. 29 of the 272 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2022. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 6 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 34 publications 2022: 54 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 32 publications 2025: 26 publications 2026: 3 publications
2003 2026

272 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alireza Keshavarz: publications per year, 2003 to 2026
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 1
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 3
2013 2
2014 6
2015 11
2016 5
2017 1
2018 6
2019 13
2020 31
2021 34
2022 54
2023 42
2024 32
2025 26
2026 3
Total 272
Download as CSV

Alireza Keshavarz publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alireza Keshavarz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 248–257 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 254 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280 254
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Alireza Keshavarz D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alireza Keshavarz sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114 65
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Alireza Keshavarz is affiliated with Edith Cowan University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Engineering and Environmental Science, with significant contributions in subfields such as Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials, Environmental Engineering, and Environmental Chemistry.

The scientist has published extensively on topics related to hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, enhanced oil recovery techniques, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, CO2 sequestration and geologic interactions, methane hydrates and related phenomena, petroleum processing and analysis, and drilling and well engineering.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Energy & Fuels
  • Fuel
  • Journal of Energy Storage
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Alireza Keshavarz include:

  • Stefan Iglauer
  • Muhammad Ali
  • Abbas Khaksar Manshad
  • Hussein Hoteit
  • Hussein Rasool Abid

Representative recent papers authored or coauthored include:

  • Recent advances in carbon dioxide geological storage, experimental procedures, influencing parameters, and future outlook (2021, Earth-Science Reviews)
  • Hydrogen Wettability of Sandstone Reservoirs: Implications for Hydrogen Geo-Storage (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • Influence of pressure, temperature and organic surface concentration on hydrogen wettability of caprock; implications for hydrogen geo-storage (2021, Energy Reports)
  • A review of hydrogen/rock/brine interaction: Implications for Hydrogen Geo-storage (2022, Progress in Energy and Combustion Science)
  • H2−brine interfacial tension as a function of salinity, temperature, and pressure; implications for hydrogen geo-storage (2022, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering)

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in carbon dioxide geological storage, experimental procedures, influencing parameters, and future outlook

    Unknown

  • Hydrogen Wettability of Sandstone Reservoirs: Implications for Hydrogen Geo Storage

    Stefan Iglauer;Muhammad Ali;Alireza Keshavarz

  • A review of hydrogen/rock/brine interaction: Implications for Hydrogen Geo-storage

    Unknown

  • Hydrogen wettability of carbonate formations: Implications for hydrogen geo-storage.

    Unknown

  • Assessment of wettability and rock-fluid interfacial tension of caprock: Implications for hydrogen and carbon dioxide geo-storage

    Unknown

  • Influence of pressure, temperature and organic surface concentration on hydrogen wettability of caprock; implications for hydrogen geo-storage

    Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Ali;Nurudeen Yekeen;Nilanjan Pal;Alireza Keshavarz

  • Capillary Sealing Efficiency Analysis of Caprocks: Implication for Hydrogen Geological Storage

    Unknown

  • Experimental evaluation of rock mineralogy on hydrogen-wettability: Implications for hydrogen geo-storage

    Unknown

  • Effect of Nanofluid on CO2-wettability reversal of sandstone formation; implications for CO2 geo-storage

    Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Faraz Sahito;Nilesh Kumar Jha;Nilesh Kumar Jha;Zain-Ul-Abedin Arain

  • Hydrogen storage in Majiagou carbonate reservoir in China: Geochemical modelling on carbonate dissolution and hydrogen loss

    Unknown

  • Hydrogen Adsorption on Sub-Bituminous Coal: Implications for Hydrogen Geo-Storage

    Sefan Iglauer;Hussein Abid;Ahmed Z. Al-Yaseri;Alireza Keshavarz

  • Hydrogen storage potential of coals as a function of pressure, temperature, and rank.

    Unknown

  • Hydrogen diffusion in coal: Implications for hydrogen geo-storage.

    Alireza Keshavarz;Hussein R. Abid;Muhammad Ali;Sefan Iglauer

  • Current advances in syngas (CO + H2) production through bi-reforming of methane using various catalysts: A review

    Udit Surya Mohanty;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Rizwan Azhar;Ahmed Al-Yaseri

  • Basalt-H2-brine wettability at geo-storage conditions: Implication for hydrogen storage in basaltic formations

    Unknown

  • Influence of organic molecules on wetting characteristics of mica/H2/brine systems: Implications for hydrogen structural trapping capacities.

    Muhammad Ali;Nurudeen Yekeen;Nilanjan Pal;Alireza Keshavarz

  • Effect of maceral composition and coal rank on gas diffusion in Australian coals

    Alireza Keshavarz;Richard Sakurovs;Mihaela Grigore;Mohammad Sayyafzadeh

  • CO2-wettability of sandstones exposed to traces of organic acids: Implications for CO2 geo-storage

    Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Arif;Muhammad Arif;Muhammad Faraz Sahito;Sarmad Al-Anssari;Sarmad Al-Anssari

  • Linear and nonlinear intersubband optical absorption in symmetric double semi-parabolic quantum wells

    A. Keshavarz;M.J. Karimi

  • Experimental investigation of the effect of green TiO2/Quartz nanocomposite on interfacial tension reduction, wettability alteration, and oil recovery improvement

    Ghasem Zargar;Tooraj Arabpour;Abbas Khaksar Manshad;Jagar A. Ali

  • CuO/TiO2/PAM as a Novel Introduced Hybrid Agent for Water—Oil Interfacial Tension and Wettability Optimization in Chemical Enhanced Oil Recovery

    Hossein Bahraminejad;Abbas Khaksar Manshad;Masoud Riazi;Jagar A. Ali

  • Environmental Friendliness and High Performance of Multifunctional Tween 80/ZnO-Nanoparticles-Added Water-Based Drilling Fluid: An Experimental Approach

    Adnan Aftab;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Faraz Sahito;Udit Surya Mohanty

  • Nanomaterial-based drilling fluids for exploitation of unconventional reservoirs: A review

    Muhammad Ali;Husna Hayati Jarni;Adnan Aftab;Abdul Razak Ismail

  • Stimulation of the natural fracture system by graded proppant injection

    Aditya Khanna;Alireza Keshavarz;Kate Mobbs;Michael Davis

  • Influence of tailor-made TiO2/API bentonite nanocomposite on drilling mud performance: Towards enhanced drilling operations

    Adnan Aftab;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Ali;Muhammad Arif;Sallahudin Panhwar

  • Stimulation of coal seam permeability by micro-sized graded proppant placement using selective fluid properties

    Alireza Keshavarz;Alexander Badalyan;Themis Carageorgos;Pavel Bedrikovetsky

  • Effect of Environment-Friendly Non-Ionic Surfactant on Interfacial Tension Reduction and Wettability Alteration; Implications for Enhanced Oil Recovery

    Omid Mosalman Haghighi;Ghasem Zargar;Abbas Khaksar Manshad;Muhammad Ali

  • Laboratory-based mathematical modelling of graded proppant injection in CBM reservoirs

    Alireza Keshavarz;Yulong Yang;Alexander Badalyan;Ray Johnson

  • Productivity enhancement by stimulation of natural fractures around a hydraulic fracture using micro-sized proppant placement

    Alireza Keshavarz;Alireza Keshavarz;Alexander Badalyan;Raymond Johnson;Pavel Bedrikovetsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Iglauer
Stefan Iglauer Edith Cowan University
Abbas Khaksar Manshad
Abbas Khaksar Manshad Petroleum University of Technology
S. Mohammad Sajadi
S. Mohammad Sajadi Cihan University-Erbil
Pavel Bedrikovetsky
Pavel Bedrikovetsky University of Adelaide
Ahmed Al-Yaseri
Ahmed Al-Yaseri King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
Mohammad Sarmadivaleh
Mohammad Sarmadivaleh Colorado School of Mines
Amir H. Mohammadi
Amir H. Mohammadi University of KwaZulu-Natal
Seyed Reza Shadizadeh
Seyed Reza Shadizadeh Petroleum University of Technology
Abbas Taheri
Abbas Taheri University of Adelaide
Maxim Lebedev
Maxim Lebedev Curtin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in exploring alternative or complementary paths to an Engineering and Technology degree in the USA? Numerous online programs now offer accelerated and flexible learning tailored to high-demand career fields. For professionals seeking to combine business strategy with technical expertise, a 6 month mba program can deliver leadership skills in a fraction of the time.

Students looking to apply organizational and analytical skills in legal environments may benefit from a paralegal accelerated program—a fast-track way to enter vital roles supporting attorneys. For those drawn to numbers and financial records, earning a bookkeeping certification online is a cost-effective route to administrative and accounting positions.

Meanwhile, those who excel in managing office workflows can expand their options with an office administration degree pursued entirely online. Together, these programs exemplify the vast range of online degrees and certifications that can open new career pathways, complementing or diversifying your engineering and technology background.

Best Scientists Citing Alireza Keshavarz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles