World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
87
Citations
30646
World Ranking
1080
National Ranking
670

Alan Booth publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Booth sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 216 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Alan Booth D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alan Booth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Alan Booth was affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their scholarly work included research related to social sciences, with publications that contributed to understanding human development and social behavior.

One of Booth's documented research papers is titled The Development of Gendered Interests and Personality Qualities from Middle Childhood through Adolescence: A Bio-Social Analysis, published in 2020 in UNC Libraries.

Booth collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Susan M. McHale
  • Ji Yeon Kim
  • Aryn M. Dotterer
  • Ann C. Crouter

The publication venues where Booth contributed included:

  • UNC Libraries

Booth was recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom, a distinction that marks a notable level of engagement within the academic community, although the exact year of this award is unspecified.

Throughout their career, Booth focused on interdisciplinary topics that intersect bio-social analysis with developmental psychology and social science methodologies, as reflected in their research themes.

Best Publications

  • Testosterone and dominance in men.

    Allan Mazur;Alan Booth

  • A Generation at Risk: Growing Up in an Era of Family Upheaval

    Paul R. Amato;Alan Booth

  • Parental Divorce, Marital Conflict, and Offspring Well-being during Early Adulthood

    Paul R. Amato;Laura Spencer Loomis;Alan Booth

  • Cohabitation versus marriage : A comparison of relationship quality

    Susan L. Brown;Alan Booth

  • Testosterone, and winning and losing in human competition.

    Alan Booth;Greg Shelley;Allan Mazur;Gerry Tharp

  • Divorce and psychological stress.

    Alan Booth;Paul Amato

  • Alone Together: How Marriage in America Is Changing

    Paul R. Amato;Alan Booth;David R. Johnson;Stacy J. Rogers

  • Parental Predivorce Relations and Offspring Postdivorce Well-Being

    Alan Booth;Paul R. Amato

  • Continuity and Change in Marital Quality Between 1980 and 2000

    Paul R. Amato;David R. Johnson;Alan Booth;Stacy J. Rogers

  • Unhappily Ever After: Effects of Long-Term, Low-Quality Marriages on Well-Being

    Daniel N. Hawkins;Alan Booth

  • A Prospective Study of Divorce and Parent-Child Relationships.

    Paul R. Amato;Alan Booth

  • Consequences of Parental Divorce and Marital Unhappiness for Adult Well-Being.

    Paul R. Amato;Alan Booth

  • Measuring Marital Instability.

    Alan Booth;David Johnson;John N. Edwards

  • The legacy of parents' marital discord: consequences for children's marital quality.

    Paul R. Amato;Alan Booth

  • Testosterone and Men's Marriages

    Alan Booth;James M. Dabbs

  • The quality and stability of remarriages: the role of stepchildren

    Lynn K. White;Alan Booth

  • Sex and Social Participation

    Alan Booth

  • Changes in gender role attitudes and perceived marital quality

    Paul R. Amato;Alan Booth

  • The ''trouble'' with salivary testosterone

    Douglas A Granger;Elizabeth A Shirtcliff;Alan Booth;Katie T Kivlighan

  • Family-school links : how do they affect educational outcomes?

    Alan Booth;Judith F. Dunn

  • Children's influence on family dynamics: The neglected side of family relationships.

    Ann C. Crouter;Alan Booth

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Johnson
David R. Johnson Pennsylvania State University
Ann C. Crouter
Ann C. Crouter Pennsylvania State University
Paul R. Amato
Paul R. Amato Pennsylvania State University
Nancy S. Landale
Nancy S. Landale Pennsylvania State University
Douglas A. Granger
Douglas A. Granger University of California, Irvine
Lynn K. White
Lynn K. White University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Susan M. McHale
Susan M. McHale Pennsylvania State University
Susan Welch
Susan Welch Pennsylvania State University
Allan Mazur
Allan Mazur Syracuse University
Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff
Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff Iowa State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about studying psychology, you might also consider related fields like social work. Social work degrees can broaden your career opportunities, especially if you’re interested in supporting communities and individuals beyond traditional clinical psychology. Many universities now offer flexible online options, allowing you to balance study with other commitments.

When it comes to finding a program, location can play a significant role. For example, students looking for the best social work programs in Alabama or the best social work degrees in Arkansas have a range of accredited options to choose from. In urban settings, resources like the top social work degrees in Columbus and best social work programs in Houston highlight institutions with strong academic reputations and robust career support.

Pursuing online or hybrid programs in psychology and social work opens doors to roles in counseling, therapy, case management, advocacy, and more. These online pathways make it easier to gain practical skills, network with professionals, and prepare for licensure in your chosen field.

Best Scientists Citing Alan Booth

Recently Published Articles