| Discipline name | D-Index | World Ranking | National Ranking | Publications | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Plant Science and Agronomy | 55 | 1645 | 45 | 143 | 8953 |
The chart shows the history of publications by A. Van Kammen between 1961 and 2003, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. A. Van Kammen published across 43 years, from 1961 to 2003, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1996. 6 of the 159 publications appeared in the last two years.
159 publications in total across all disciplines
| Year | Publications |
|---|---|
| 1961 | 1 |
| 1962 | 0 |
| 1963 | 0 |
| 1964 | 1 |
| 1965 | 0 |
| 1966 | 1 |
| 1967 | 2 |
| 1968 | 1 |
| 1969 | 0 |
| 1970 | 2 |
| 1971 | 0 |
| 1972 | 2 |
| 1973 | 2 |
| 1974 | 1 |
| 1975 | 1 |
| 1976 | 0 |
| 1977 | 1 |
| 1978 | 5 |
| 1979 | 0 |
| 1980 | 4 |
| 1981 | 1 |
| 1982 | 2 |
| 1983 | 2 |
| 1984 | 5 |
| 1985 | 3 |
| 1986 | 5 |
| 1987 | 6 |
| 1988 | 7 |
| 1989 | 6 |
| 1990 | 11 |
| 1991 | 4 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 10 |
| 1994 | 8 |
| 1995 | 13 |
| 1996 | 15 |
| 1997 | 13 |
| 1998 | 8 |
| 1999 | 3 |
| 2000 | 3 |
| 2001 | 1 |
| 2002 | 5 |
| 2003 | 1 |
| Total | 159 |
The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Van Kammen sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 143 publications — 54th percentile
54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.
| Publications | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 36–40 | 2 | |
| 41–45 | 7 | |
| 46–50 | 40 | |
| 51–55 | 58 | |
| 56–60 | 60 | |
| 61–65 | 107 | |
| 66–70 | 130 | |
| 71–75 | 153 | |
| 76–80 | 191 | |
| 81–85 | 199 | |
| 86–90 | 206 | |
| 91–95 | 218 | |
| 96–100 | 226 | |
| 101–105 | 227 | |
| 106–110 | 247 | |
| 111–115 | 255 | |
| 116–120 | 253 | |
| 121–125 | 233 | |
| 126–130 | 219 | |
| 131–135 | 201 | |
| 136–140 | 194 | |
| 141–145 | 176 | 143 |
| 146–150 | 157 | |
| 151–155 | 147 | |
| 156–160 | 151 | |
| 161–165 | 159 | |
| 166–170 | 137 | |
| 171–175 | 128 | |
| 176–180 | 126 | |
| 181–185 | 98 | |
| 186–190 | 114 | |
| 191–195 | 100 | |
| 196–200 | 90 | |
| 201–205 | 71 | |
| 206–210 | 98 | |
| 211–215 | 70 | |
| 216–220 | 86 | |
| 221–225 | 61 | |
| 226–230 | 58 | |
| 231–235 | 53 | |
| 236–240 | 64 | |
| 241–245 | 39 | |
| 246–250 | 46 | |
| 251–255 | 51 | |
| 256–260 | 36 | |
| 261–265 | 44 | |
| 266–270 | 35 | |
| 271–275 | 30 | |
| 276–280 | 33 | |
| 281–285 | 35 | |
| 286–290 | 36 | |
| 291–295 | 26 | |
| 296–300 | 26 | |
| 301–305 | 31 | |
| 306–310 | 30 | |
| 311–315 | 21 | |
| 316–320 | 29 | |
| 321–325 | 14 | |
| 326–330 | 15 | |
| 331–335 | 15 | |
| 336–340 | 17 | |
| 341–345 | 15 | |
| 346–350 | 12 | |
| 351–355 | 17 | |
| 356–360 | 18 | |
| 361–365 | 12 | |
| 366–370 | 11 | |
| 371–375 | 6 | |
| 376–380 | 6 | |
| 381–385 | 11 | |
| 386–390 | 9 | |
| 391–395 | 10 | |
| 396–400 | 8 | |
| 401–405 | 4 | |
| 406–410 | 9 | |
| 411–415 | 11 | |
| 416–420 | 4 | |
| 421–425 | 7 | |
| 426–430 | 4 | |
| 431–435 | 3 | |
| 436–440 | 5 | |
| 441–445 | 8 | |
| 446–450 | 6 | |
| 451–455 | 7 | |
| 456–460 | 5 | |
| 461–465 | 6 | |
| 466 | 2 | |
| 467+ | 99 |
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. Van Kammen sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 55 D-Index — 76th percentile
76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.
| D-Index | Scientists | This scientist |
|---|---|---|
| 30 | 200 | |
| 31 | 236 | |
| 32 | 253 | |
| 33 | 283 | |
| 34 | 288 | |
| 35 | 240 | |
| 36 | 246 | |
| 37 | 243 | |
| 38 | 247 | |
| 39 | 229 | |
| 40 | 232 | |
| 41 | 230 | |
| 42 | 228 | |
| 43 | 219 | |
| 44 | 193 | |
| 45 | 164 | |
| 46 | 158 | |
| 47 | 143 | |
| 48 | 131 | |
| 49 | 127 | |
| 50 | 122 | |
| 51 | 122 | |
| 52 | 110 | |
| 53 | 102 | |
| 54 | 98 | |
| 55 | 79 | 55 |
| 56 | 85 | |
| 57 | 88 | |
| 58 | 91 | |
| 59 | 62 | |
| 60 | 61 | |
| 61 | 59 | |
| 62 | 54 | |
| 63 | 61 | |
| 64 | 59 | |
| 65 | 58 | |
| 66 | 41 | |
| 67 | 49 | |
| 68 | 39 | |
| 69 | 32 | |
| 70 | 40 | |
| 71 | 47 | |
| 72 | 38 | |
| 73 | 28 | |
| 74 | 29 | |
| 75 | 28 | |
| 76 | 22 | |
| 77 | 21 | |
| 78 | 25 | |
| 79 | 26 | |
| 80 | 19 | |
| 81 | 16 | |
| 82 | 12 | |
| 83 | 16 | |
| 84 | 14 | |
| 85 | 11 | |
| 86 | 17 | |
| 87 | 13 | |
| 88 | 10 | |
| 89 | 12 | |
| 90 | 18 | |
| 91 | 16 | |
| 92 | 16 | |
| 93 | 17 | |
| 94 | 12 | |
| 95 | 8 | |
| 96 | 9 | |
| 97 | 9 | |
| 98 | 11 | |
| 99 | 12 | |
| 100 | 5 | |
| 101 | 8 | |
| 102 | 4 | |
| 103 | 11 | |
| 104 | 5 | |
| 105 | 9 | |
| 106 | 7 | |
| 107 | 4 | |
| 108 | 8 | |
| 109+ | 99 |
B. Scheres;C. van de Wiel;A. Zalensky;B. Horvath
W.C. Yang;P. Katinakis;P. Hendriks;A. Smolders
C. van de Wiel;B. Scheres;H.J. Franssen;M.J. van Lierop
Arjon J. van Hengel;Zewdie Tadesse;Peter Immerzeel;Henk Schols
Sacco C. de Vries;Hilbert Booij;Peter Meyerink;Gert Huisman
B.J.G. Scheres;F. van Engelen;E. van der Knaap;C. van de Wiel
A. J. De Jong;R. Heidstra;H. P. Spaink;M. V. Hartog
R. Heidstra;W.C. Yang;Y. Yalcin;S. Peck
W C Yang;C de Blank;I Meskiene;H Hirt
Karin van de Sande;Katharina Pawlowski;Inge Czaja;Ursula Wieneke
J. Wellink;A. B. Van Kammen
A. Van Kammen
Arjon J. van Hengel;Flavia Guzzo;Ab van Kammen;Sacco C. de Vries
Jacques Hille;Frank Verheggen;Peter Roelvink;Henk Franssen
Unknown
T. Bisseling;R.C. Van Den Bos;A. Van Kammen
J. E. Carette;M. Stuiver;J. van Lent;J. Wellink
C. W. Vroemen;S. Langeveld;U. Mayer;G. Ripper
R. Geurts;R. Heidstra;A. E. Hadri;J. A. Downie
Arjon J. Van Hengel;Ab Van Kammen;Sacco C. De Vries
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.