World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
New Zealand
2025

A. J. Parsons publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. J. Parsons sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

A. J. Parsons D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where A. J. Parsons sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in New Zealand Leader Award

Best Publications

  • Diet preference of sheep: effects of recent diet, physiological state and species abundance

    A. J. Parsons;J. A. Newman;P. D. Penning;A. Harvey

  • The physiology of grass production under grazing. II. Photosynthesis, crop growth and animal intake of continuously-grazed swards.

    Parsons Aj;Leafe El;Collett B;Penning Pd

  • Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under continuous stocking

    P. D. Penning;A. J. Parsons;R. J. Orr;T. T. Treacher

  • High nitrogen supply and carbohydrate content reduce fungal endophyte and alkaloid concentration in Lolium perenne

    Susanne Rasmussen;Anthony J. Parsons;Shalome Bassett;Michael J. Christensen

  • ANALYSIS OF THE COEXISTENCE MECHANISMS FOR GRASSES AND LEGUMES IN GRAZING SYSTEMS

    S. Schwinning;A. J. Parsons

  • DairyMod and EcoMod: biophysical pasture-simulation models for Australia and New Zealand

    I. R. Johnson;D. F. Chapman;V. O. Snow;R. J. Eckard

  • The effect of the duration of regrowth on photosynthesis, leaf death and the average rate of growth in a rotationally grazed sward

    A. J. Parsons;P. D. Penning

  • The Physiology of Grass Production Under Grazing. I. Characteristics of Leaf and Canopy Photosynthesis of Continuously-Grazed Swards

    A. J. Parsons;E. L. Leafe;B. Collett;W. Stiles

  • Metabolic Profiles of Lolium perenne Are Differentially Affected by Nitrogen Supply, Carbohydrate Content, and Fungal Endophyte Infection

    Susanne Rasmussen;Anthony J. Parsons;Karl Fraser;Hong Xue

  • Use of a model to optimize the interaction between frequency and severity of intermittent defoliation and to provide a fundamental comparison of the continuous and intermittent defoliation of grass

    A. J. Parsons;I. R. Johnson;A. Harvey

  • Fasting affects intake behaviour and diet preference of grazing sheep

    J.A. Newman;P.D. Penning;A.J. Parsons;A. Harvey

  • The effects of season and management on the growth of grass swards

    A. J. Parsons

  • Optimal diet selection by a generalist grazing herbivore

    J. A. Newman;A. J. Parsons;J. H. M. Thornley;P. D. Penning

  • A mechanistic model of some physical determinants of intake rate and diet selection in a two-species temperate grassland sward.

    A. J. Parsons;J. H. M. Thornley;J. Newman;P. D. Penning

  • Past lessons and future prospects: plant breeding for yield and persistence in cool-temperate pastures

    A. J. Parsons;G. R. Edwards;P. C. D. Newton;D. F. Chapman

  • Impacts of spatial patterns in pasture on animal grazing behavior, intake, and performance

    D. F. Chapman;A. J. Parsons;G. P. Cosgrove;D. J. Barker

  • The effects of group size on grazing time in sheep

    P.D. Penning;A.J. Parsons;J.A. Newman;R.J. Orr

  • Not all sheep prefer clover : diet selection revisited

    J. A. Newman;A. J. Parsons;A. Harvey

  • Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under rotational grazing

    P. D. Penning;A. J. Parsons;R. J. Orr;G. E. Hooper

  • Effects of elevated CO2, nitrogen and fungal endophyte-infection on tall fescue: growth, photosynthesis, chemical composition and digestibility

    J. A. Newman;M. L. Abner;R. G. Dado;D. J. Gibson

  • How predictable are aphid population responses to elevated CO2

    J. A. Newman;D. J. Gibson;D. J. Gibson;A. J. Parsons;J. H. M. Thornley

  • The use of spatial memory by grazing animals to locate food patches in spatially heterogeneous environments: an example with sheep

    G.R. Edwards;J.A. Newman;A.J. Parsons;J.R. Krebs

  • Use of cues by grazing animals to locate food patches: an example with sheep

    G.R. Edwards;J.A. Newman;A.J. Parsons;J.R. Krebs

  • Relationship between vegetation state and bite dimensions of sheep grazing contrasting plant species and its implications for intake rate and diet selection

    G. R. Edwards;A. J. Parsons;P. D. Penning;J. A. Newman

  • High sugar ryegrasses for livestock systems in New Zealand

    Grant Edwards;A. Parsons;S. Rasmussen;Racheal H. Bryant

  • Plant−animal interactions in a continuously grazed mixture. I, Differences in the physiology of leaf expansion and the fate of leaves of grass and clover

    A. J. Parsons;Anne Harvey;Jane Woledge

  • PLANT-ANIMAL INTERACTIONS IN A CONTINUOUSLY GRAZED MIXTURE. II. THE ROLE OF DIFFERENCES IN THE PHYSIOLOGY OF PLANT GROWTH AND OF SELECTIVE GRAZING ON THE PERFORMANCE AND STABILITY OF SPECIES IN A MIXTURE

    A. J. Parsons;Anne Harvey;I. R. Johnson

  • Diet preferences of adult sheep and goats grazing ryegrass and white clover

    P.D. Penning;J.A. Newman;A.J. Parsons;A. Harvey

  • Some 'high sugar grasses' don't like it hot

    A.J. Parsons;S. Rasmussen;H. Xue;J.A. Newman

  • Bite dimensions and grazing movements by sheep and cattle grazing homogeneous perennial ryegrass swards

    A.J Rook;A Harvey;A.J Parsons;R.J Orr

  • Metabolomics of forage plants: a review

    Susanne Rasmussen;Anthony J. Parsons;Christopher S. Jones

  • Selective grazing modifies previously anticipated responses of plant community composition to elevated CO(2) in a temperate grassland.

    Paul C. D. Newton;Mark Lieffering;Anthony J. Parsons;Shona C. Brock

  • The spatial pattern of vegetation in cut and grazed grass/white clover pastures.

    G. R. Edwards;A. J. Parsons;J. A. Newman;I. A. Wright

  • Dietary preference of sheep for perennial ryegrass and white clover at contrasting sward surface heights

    A. Harvey;A. J. Parsons;A. J. Rook;P. D. Penning

  • Grass-endophyte interactions: a note on the role of monosaccharide transport in the Neotyphodium lolii-Lolium perenne symbiosis.

    Susanne Rasmussen;Qianhe Liu;Anthony J. Parsons;Hong Xue

  • Metabolite analysis of the effects of elevated CO2 and nitrogen fertilization on the association between tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus) and its fungal symbiont Neotyphodium coenophialum.

    Geraldine D. Ryan;Susanne Rasmussen;Hong Xue;Anthony J. Parsons

  • Effect of long-term changes in relative resource availability on dietary preference of grazing sheep for perennial ryegrass and white clover

    A. J. Rook;A. Harvey;A. J. Parsons;P. D. Penning

  • Opportunities for enhancing the delivery of novel forage attributes

    G. P. Cosgrove;A. J. Parsons;D. M. Marotti;S. M. Rutter

  • Soil carbon dynamics: the effects of nitrogen input, intake demand and off-take by animals.

    Anthony J. Parsons;John H.M. Thornley;Philip C.D. Newton;Susanne K. Rasmussen

  • The effects of carbohydrate supply and host genetic background on Epichloë endophyte and alkaloid concentrations in perennial ryegrass

    G.D. Ryan;S. Rasmussen;A.J. Parsons;J.A. Newman

  • REVIEW: PART OF A HIGHLIGHT ON BREEDING STRATEGIES FOR FORAGE AND GRASS IMPROVEMENT Metabolomics of forage plants: a review

    Susanne Rasmussen;Anthony J. Parsons;Christopher S. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

S. M. Rutter
S. M. Rutter Harper Adams University
Mark J. Hovenden
Mark J. Hovenden University of Tasmania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing A. J. Parsons

Trending Scientists