| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 1117 | 9 | 10 | 4 |
The main research concerns discussed in the journal are Pedagogy, Mathematics education, Curriculum, Teaching method and Social psychology. Education 3-13 holds forums on Pedagogy that merges themes from other disciplines such as Higher education and Medical education. In addition to Mathematics education research, Education 3-13 aims to explore topics under Test (assessment) and Reading (process).
Curriculum and Public relations are closely related fields of research discussed in the journal. Research on Social psychology addressed in Education 3-13 frequently intersections with the field of Developmental psychology.
The journal papers mainly tackle studies in Pedagogy, Mathematics education, Social psychology, Curriculum and Teaching method. Pedagogy research in the most cited articles connects with the study of Medical education. The featured Mathematics education studies in the journal papers mainly concentrate on Higher education but also cover areas of interest in Distance education.
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Education 3-13 (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Education 3-13 (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 49.52% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 17.83% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 6.37% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 6.37% of all publications and 69.43% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Tingting Li;Emily Miller;I.-Chien Chen;Kayla Bartz
(2021)Sally Goddard Blythe;Rebecca Duncombe;Pat Preedy;Trish Gorely
(2021)Pat Preedy;Rebecca Duncombe;Trish Gorely
(2020)Taro Fujita;Jonathan Doney;Ruth Flanagan;Rupert Wegerif
(2021)Peter Blatchford
(2021)Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities often leads to diverse career opportunities, many of which now offer flexible education options through online programs. For those interested in mental health and education, nasp accredited online school psychology programs provide a specialized path to working with children and adolescents in educational settings.
If your passion lies in supporting individuals through recovery, an addiction counseling online degree can prepare you for a vital role helping those overcome substance abuse challenges. Many online programs offer the flexibility needed to balance studies with other commitments.
For students seeking more accessible entry points into counseling, several options are considered among the easiest degree in counseling, easing the transition into this rewarding field without compromising quality education.
Additionally, those aiming to become licensed marriage and family therapists can benefit from lmft programs designed to be completed in less time, accelerating entry into professional practice. These pathways highlight the growing accessibility and variety within social sciences and humanities careers through online learning.
