Developmental Review

Top Research Topics at Developmental Review?

The main research concerns discussed in Developmental Review are Developmental psychology, Cognitive psychology, Social psychology, Cognition and Cognitive development. Child development studies in the realm of Developmental psychology interact with fields like Perspective (graphical). The journal addresses concerns in Cognitive psychology which are intertwined with other disciplines, such as Childhood memory, Cognitive science and Perception.

The Social psychology works, particularly on Socialization are tackled in Developmental Review. The majority of Cognitive development studies in it are focused on the subject of Piaget's theory of cognitive development.

• Developmental psychology (45.19%)
• Cognitive psychology (28.35%)
• Social psychology (21.77%)

What are the most cited papers published in the journal?

• A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-Taking. (2182 citations)
• The development of achievement task values: A theoretical analysis (1279 citations)
• How social contexts support and shape language development (1054 citations)

Research areas of the most cited articles at Developmental Review:

The journal publications investigate areas of study like Developmental psychology, Social psychology, Cognitive psychology, Cognitive development and Cognition. Most of the works presented in the journal articles deal with Developmental psychology but they intersect with the subject of Affect (psychology). The published Cognitive psychology research zeroes in on concepts in Information processing but also tackles themes under Perspective (graphical).

What topics the last edition of the journal is best known for?

• Cognition
• Social psychology
• Developmental psychology

The previous edition focused in particular on these issues:

The journal investigates studies in Developmental psychology, Cognition, Early childhood, Cognitive psychology and Construct (philosophy). The journal focuses on Developmental psychology but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Context (language use) and Prejudice (legal term). The Cognition study presented in Developmental Review encompasses related topics like Cognitive development and also examines its connection to subjects such as Phase contrast microscopy.

Developmental Review explores topics in Early childhood which can be helpful for research in disciplines like Neglect, Association (psychology), Life history theory, Observational methods in psychology and Aggression. It holds forums on Cognitive psychology that merges themes from other disciplines such as Language acquisition, Language development, Foundation (evidence), Reciprocal and Parent-child interaction. While Construct (philosophy) is the focus of Developmental Review, it also provided insights into the studies of Social psychology, Shyness and Focus (linguistics).

The most cited articles from the last journal are:

• Correlates and antecedents of theory of mind development during middle childhood and adolescence: An integrated model (8 citations)
• Network Selection and Influence Effects on Children’s and Adolescents’ Internalizing Behaviors and Peer Victimization: A Systematic Review (4 citations)
• Development of prejudice against immigrants and ethnic minorities in adolescence: A systematic review with meta-analysis of longitudinal studies (3 citations)

Papers citation over time

A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.

The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.

Top authors and change over time

The top authors publishing in Developmental Review (based on the number of publications) are:

• Valerie F. Reyna (13 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• Charles J. Brainerd (12 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Mark L. Howe (11 papers) absent at the last edition,
• David F. Bjorklund (10 papers) absent at the last edition,
• Mary L. Courage (7 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.

Top affiliations and change over time

Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered

The top affiliations publishing in Developmental Review (based on the number of publications) are:

• Pennsylvania State University (23 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition the same number as at the previous edition,
• Cornell University (22 papers) published 1 paper at the last edition,
• University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (16 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition, 1 more than at the previous edition,
• Leiden University (15 papers) published 2 papers at the last edition,
• Harvard University (15 papers) absent at the last edition.

The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.

Publication chance based on affiliation

The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.

The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.

During the most recent 2021 edition, 0.00% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 19.35% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 19.35% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 19.35% of all publications and 41.94% were from other institutions.

Returning Authors Index

A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.

The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.

Returning Institution Index

The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.

The experience to innovation index

Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).

The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:

• Novice - P < 5 or C < 25 (the number of publications less than 5 or the number of citations less than 25),
• Competent - P < 10 or C < 100 (the number of publications less than 10 or the number of citations less than 100),
• Experienced - P < 25 or C < 625 (the number of publications less than 25 or the number of citations less than 625),
• Master - P < 50 or C < 2500 (the number of publications less than 50 or the number of citations less than 2500),
• Star - P ≥ 50 and C ≥ 2500 (both the number of publications greater than 50 and the number of citations greater than 2500).

The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.

Further Reading: Criminal Psychology In Virginia

While Developmental Review covers a broad spectrum of psychology topics, readers might also be interested in expanding their knowledge in a specialized field like criminal psychology. Stored in the intersection of psychology and criminal justice, it is a fascinating and essential discipline in understanding criminal behavior and applying this understanding to legal settings.

If you are based in Virginia or wish to study in this area, you'd find numerous renowned criminal psychology colleges in Virginia. These institutions provide comprehensive criminal psychology programs that offer to equip you with the knowledge and skills required to excel in this field. Not only do they delve into the psychological theories related to criminal behavior, but they also provide students with an understanding of the law enforcement and judicial processes.

This well-rounded approach ensures students are adequately prepared for all the potential challenges they might encounter in their criminal psychology careers. Indeed, by applying insights from psychology to the legal system, criminal psychologists play a crucial role in helping the community and making a difference in people's lives.