| Discipline name | Position | Best Scientists | Publications | D-Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 1087 | 7 | 15 | 5 |
| Social Sciences and Humanities | 1319 | 8 | 7 | 2 |
Applied Measurement in Education facilitates discussions on Test (assessment), Statistics, Mathematics education, Item response theory and Econometrics. It focuses on Test (assessment) but the discussions also offer insight into other areas such as Social psychology and Standardized test. While work presented in Applied Measurement in Education provided substantial information on Social psychology, it also covered topics in Higher education, Cognitive psychology, Applied psychology and Clinical psychology.
It focuses on different Statistics studies like Equating, Differential item functioning, Sample size determination, Reliability (statistics) and Computerized adaptive testing. The majority of Equating studies presented zero in on Anchor test. It features Differential item functioning research that overlaps with concepts in Developmental psychology.
The studies in Mathematics education featured incorporate elements of Pedagogy and Reading (process). Item response theory research presented in it encompasses a variety of subjects, including Sampling (statistics), Context (language use), Rasch model and Item analysis. In addition to Econometrics, it tackled discussions on Scale (ratio).
The most cited articles primarily tackle Test (assessment), Statistics, Mathematics education, Item response theory and Educational assessment. Issues in Test (assessment) were discussed in the most cited articles, taking into consideration concepts from other disciplines like Standardized test, Context (language use), Social psychology and Artificial intelligence. The most cited articles feature works in Statistics, more specifically Differential item functioning, Test score, Computerized adaptive testing and Reliability (statistics), and explore their relation to disciplines like Scale (ratio).
The journal is organized to address concerns in the fields of Test (assessment), Protocol analysis, Mathematics education, Applied psychology and Statistics. The Test (assessment) study presented in the journal encompasses related topics like Entrance exam and also examines its connection to subjects such as Yearbook. The tackled Protocol analysis research is interrelated with Data collection which concerns subjects like Test validity and Respondent.
Formative assessment is a key component of Mathematics education research discussed in it. The concepts on Applied psychology presented in the journal can also apply to other research fields, including Nonparametric statistics, Student learning, Non cognitive, Test taker and Anchoring. The featured works in Incremental validity and Test score, which all belong in the domain if Statistics, also overlaps with concepts under Vertical scaling and Extension (predicate logic).
A key indicator for each journal is its effectiveness in reaching other researchers with the papers published at that venue.
The chart below presents the interquartile range (first quartile 25%, median 50% and third quartile 75%) of the number of citations of articles over time.
The top authors publishing in Applied Measurement in Education (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top authors publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top authors.
Only papers with recognized affiliations are considered
The top affiliations publishing in Applied Measurement in Education (based on the number of publications) are:
The overall trend for top affiliations publishing in this journal is outlined below. The chart shows the number of publications at each edition of the journal for top affiliations.
The publication chance index shows the ratio of articles published by the best research institutions in the journal edition to all articles published within that journal. The best research institutions were selected based on the largest number of articles published during all editions of the journal.
The chart below presents the percentage ratio of articles from top institutions (based on their ranking of total papers).Top affiliations were grouped by their rank into the following tiers: top 1-10, top 11-20, top 21-50, and top 51+. Only articles with a recognized affiliation are considered.
During the most recent 2021 edition, 18.18% of publications had an unrecognized affiliation. Out of the publications with recognized affiliations, 38.89% were posted by at least one author from the top 10 institutions publishing in the journal. Another 11.11% included authors affiliated with research institutions from the top 11-20 affiliations. Institutions from the 21-50 range included 16.67% of all publications and 33.33% were from other institutions.
A very common phenomenon observed among researchers publishing scientific articles is the intentional selection of journals they have already attended in the past. In particular, it is worth analyzing the case when the authors participate in the same journal from year to year.
The Returning Authors Index presented below illustrates the ratio of authors who participated in both a given as well as the previous edition of the journal in relation to all participants in a given year.
The graph below shows the Returning Institution Index, illustrating the ratio of institutions that participated in both a given and the previous edition of the conference in relation to all affiliations present in a given year.
Our experience to innovation index was created to show a cross-section of the experience level of authors publishing in a journal. The index includes the authors publishing at the last edition of a journal, grouped by total number of publications throughout their academic career (P) and the total number of citations of these publications ever received (C).
The group intervals were selected empirically to best show the diversity of the authors' experiences, their labels were selected as a convenience, not as judgment. The authors were divided into the following groups:
The chart below illustrates experience levels of first authors in cases of publications with multiple authors.
Hansol Lee;Huy Q. Chung;Yu Zhang;Jamal Abedi
(2020)Yasmine H. El Masri;David Andrich
(2020)Steven L. Wise
(2020)Daniel Bolt;Yang Caroline Wang;Robert H. Meyer;Libby Pier
(2020)Dmitry Abbakumov;Piet Desmet;Wim Van den Noortgate
(2020)Craig S. Wells;Stephen G. Sireci
(2020)Exploring Psychology through online education offers flexible and affordable options. Many students turn to non profit online colleges to ensure quality programs with recognized accreditation. These institutions often provide renowned degrees without the hefty price tag of traditional universities.
For military members and veterans, finding the right program is crucial. The availability of tailored support makes online college for military students a practical choice, offering flexibility and credit for military experience.
If you want to boost your career quickly, consider exploring certificate programs that pay well. These certifications can complement a psychology degree and open doors to specialized roles in mental health, counseling, or human resources.
For those aiming to fast-track their qualifications, the quickest masters degree online options provide accelerated paths to advanced credentials. This can be especially beneficial for professionals seeking licensure or higher-level positions without lengthy time commitments.
