World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 34 12242 11885 1507 1499 157 4455

Xintao Hu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Xintao Hu between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Xintao Hu published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2023. 31 of the 218 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2023. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 11 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 21 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 7 publications
2008 2025

218 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Xintao Hu: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 1
2010 11
2011 13
2012 9
2013 23
2014 21
2015 17
2016 13
2017 15
2018 10
2019 6
2020 3
2021 6
2022 11
2023 27
2024 24
2025 7
Total 218
Download as CSV

Xintao Hu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xintao Hu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 152–161 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559 157
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Xintao Hu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xintao Hu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918 34
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Xintao Hu is affiliated with Northwestern Polytechnical University in China and has contributed extensively to the fields of neuroscience and artificial intelligence. Their research spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, computer vision, radiology, nuclear medicine, imaging, and electrical and electronic engineering.

The main areas of study focus on functional brain connectivity, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, topic modeling, advanced neuroimaging techniques, visual attention and saliency detection, and advanced memory and neural computing.

Xintao Hu has published frequently in several venues, with the highest number of publications appearing in arXiv (Cornell University), followed by Frontiers in Neuroscience, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), UNC Libraries, and IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

Their recent notable papers include:

  • When brain-inspired AI meets AGI (2023), Meta-Radiology
  • Hyperspectral anomaly detection using ensemble and robust collaborative representation (2023), Information Sciences
  • Test-retest reliability of dynamic functional connectivity in naturalistic paradigm functional magnetic resonance imaging (2021), Human Brain Mapping
  • Understanding LLMs: A comprehensive overview from training to inference (2024), Neurocomputing
  • Understanding Llms: A Comprehensive Overview from Training to Inference (2024), SSRN Electronic Journal

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Tianming Liu, Dajiang Zhu, Tuo Zhang, Xi Jiang, and Lin Zhao.

Best Publications

  • Background Prior-Based Salient Object Detection via Deep Reconstruction Residual

    Junwei Han;Dingwen Zhang;Xintao Hu;Lei Guo

  • Sparse representation of whole-brain fMRI signals for identification of functional networks.

    Jinglei Lv;Xi Jiang;Xiang Li;Dajiang Zhu

  • Representing and Retrieving Video Shots in Human-Centric Brain Imaging Space

    Junwei Han;Xiang Ji;Xintao Hu;Dajiang Zhu

  • Object detection in remote sensing imagery using a discriminatively trained mixture model

    Gong Cheng;Junwei Han;Lei Guo;Xiaoliang Qian

  • Modeling Task fMRI Data Via Deep Convolutional Autoencoder

    Heng Huang;Xintao Hu;Yu Zhao;Milad Makkie

  • DICCCOL: Dense Individualized and Common Connectivity-Based Cortical Landmarks

    Dajiang Zhu;Kaiming Li;Kaiming Li;Lei Guo;Xi Jiang

  • Test-retest reliability of functional connectivity networks during naturalistic fMRI paradigms.

    Jiahui Wang;Yudan Ren;Xintao Hu;Vinh Thai Nguyen

  • Holistic Atlases of Functional Networks and Interactions Reveal Reciprocal Organizational Architecture of Cortical Function

    Jinglei Lv;Xi Jiang;Xiang Li;Dajiang Zhu

  • Fusing DTI and fMRI data: A survey of methods and applications

    Dajiang Zhu;Tuo Zhang;Xi Jiang;Xintao Hu

  • Support vector machine multiparametric MRI identification of pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence in patients with resected glioblastoma.

    Xintao Hu;Kelvin K. Wong;Geoffrey S. Young;Lei Guo

  • Axonal Fiber Terminations Concentrate on Gyri

    Jingxin Nie;Lei Guo;Kaiming Li;Kaiming Li;Yonghua Wang

  • The integration of the internal and external milieu in the insula during dynamic emotional experiences.

    Vinh Thai Nguyen;Michael Breakspear;Xintao Hu;Christine Cong Guo

  • Weakly supervised target detection in remote sensing images based on transferred deep features and negative bootstrapping

    Peicheng Zhou;Gong Cheng;Zhenbao Liu;Shuhui Bu

  • Automatic Recognition of fMRI-Derived Functional Networks Using 3-D Convolutional Neural Networks

    Yu Zhao;Qinglin Dong;Shu Zhang;Wei Zhang

  • Coevolution of Gyral Folding and Structural Connection Patterns in Primate Brains

    Hanbo Chen;Tuo Zhang;Tuo Zhang;Lei Guo;Kaiming Li;Kaiming Li

  • Supervised Dictionary Learning for Inferring Concurrent Brain Networks

    Shijie Zhao;Junwei Han;Jinglei Lv;Xi Jiang

  • Learning Computational Models of Video Memorability from fMRI Brain Imaging

    Junwei Han;Changyuan Chen;Ling Shao;Xintao Hu

  • Latent source mining in FMRI via restricted Boltzmann machine

    Xintao Hu;Heng Huang;Bo Peng;Junwei Han

  • Individualized ROI Optimization via Maximization of Group-wise Consistency of Structural and Functional Profiles

    Kaiming Li;Lei Guo;Carlos Faraco;Dajiang Zhu

  • Task fMRI data analysis based on supervised stochastic coordinate coding

    Jinglei Lv;Binbin Lin;Qingyang Li;Wei Zhang

  • Self-organized interdependence among populations promotes cooperation by means of coevolution.

    Chen Chu;Xintao Hu;Chen Shen;Tong Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Tianming Liu
Tianming Liu University of Georgia
Lei Guo
Lei Guo Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
Junwei Han
Junwei Han Northwestern Polytechnical University
Kaiming Li
Kaiming Li Sichuan University
Dajiang Zhu
Dajiang Zhu The University of Texas at Arlington
Stephen T. C. Wong
Stephen T. C. Wong Houston Methodist
Xiaoping Hu
Xiaoping Hu University of California, Riverside
Vincent Mok
Vincent Mok Chinese University of Hong Kong
Adrian Wong
Adrian Wong Chinese University of Hong Kong
Lingjiang Li
Lingjiang Li Central South University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a wide selection of related online degrees and specialized career pathways. For those seeking a fast-track experience, programs such as the 1 year computer science degree online offer an accelerated route to launch your career sooner, combining flexibility with a rigorous curriculum.

Many learners branch out into interdisciplinary fields. Options like an environmental engineering bachelor's degree online help students merge computer science skills with environmental problem-solving—ideal for those interested in technology-driven sustainability.

For students interested in applying computational thinking to physical systems, affordable options such as a mechanical engineering degree online cost can lead to dynamic STEM career opportunities. Additionally, those fascinated by the fundamentals of science and technology may benefit from the flexibility and depth offered by accredited online physics degrees.

No matter your chosen path, online degrees allow for greater affordability, accessibility, and customization. Explore these related programs to find the best fit for your professional ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Xintao Hu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles