World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 45 5615 5415 1078 1072 178 6463

Wenbo Lu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Wenbo Lu between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Wenbo Lu published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 10 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2025. 49 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2025. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 33 publications
2003 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Wenbo Lu: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 3
2008 0
2009 4
2010 2
2011 7
2012 11
2013 6
2014 5
2015 15
2016 17
2017 14
2018 16
2019 13
2020 16
2021 26
2022 12
2023 14
2024 16
2025 33
Total 231
Download as CSV

Wenbo Lu publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wenbo Lu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 178 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 178
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Wenbo Lu D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wenbo Lu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341 45
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Wenbo Lu is affiliated with Wuhan University in China and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a primary focus on civil and structural engineering. Their research spans diverse aspects of mechanics and material behavior, particularly under dynamic and impact conditions. The main areas of study include structural response to dynamic loads, rock mechanics and modeling, high-velocity impact and material behavior, dam engineering and safety, landslides and related hazards, geotechnical engineering and underground structures, as well as geophysical methods and applications.

They have published numerous papers in notable venues, reflecting their research interests and expertise. Key publication venues include:

  • Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
  • Engineering Structures
  • Applied Sciences
  • International Journal of Impact Engineering
  • Engineering Failure Analysis

Some of Wenbo Lu's recent papers are:

  • A state-of-the-art review on blast resistance and protection of high dams to blast loads (2020, International Journal of Impact Engineering)
  • An improved method for calculating the peak explosion pressure on the borehole wall in decoupling charge blasting (2020, International Journal of Impact Engineering)
  • Mechanism of the in-hole detonation wave interactions in dual initiation with electronic detonators in bench blasting operation (2020, Computers and Geotechnics)
  • Effect of heat treatment on the stress corrosion cracking behavior of cast Mg-3Nd-3Gd-0.2Zn-0.5Zr alloy in a 3.5 wt% NaCl salt spray environment (2021, Materials Characterization)
  • Damage characteristics and failure modes of concrete gravity dams subjected to penetration and explosion (2022, Engineering Failure Analysis)

Frequent collaborators include Gaohui Wang, Peng Yan, Ming Chen, Sherong Zhang, and Yong Fan, indicating collaborative research efforts within Wenbo Lu's focus areas.

Wenbo Lu has also contributed to academic book literature, with a publication titled Seismic Performance Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams published by Springer Nature in 2020.

The combination of published articles, book authorship, and the focus on engineering disciplines demonstrates a concentrated effort on understanding and improving structural safety and material responses under various environmental and loading conditions.

Best Publications

  • Stochastic response surface method for reliability analysis of rock slopes involving correlated non-normal variables

    Dianqing Li;Yifeng Chen;Wenbo Lu;Chuangbing Zhou

  • Analysis of damage mechanisms and optimization of cut blasting design under high in-situ stresses

    L.X. Xie;L.X. Xie;W.B. Lu;Q.B. Zhang;Q.H. Jiang

  • Damage evolution mechanisms of rock in deep tunnels induced by cut blasting

    L.X. Xie;L.X. Xie;Wenbo Lu;Q.B. Zhang;Q.H. Jiang

  • Dynamic response of rock mass induced by the transient release of in-situ stress

    Wenbo Lu;Jianhua Yang;Peng Yan;Ming Chen

  • Modeling Unconfined Seepage Flow Using Three-Dimensional Numerical Manifold Method

    Qing-hui Jiang;Shu-shen Deng;Chuang-bing Zhou;Wen-bo Lu

  • Comparison of Blast-Induced Damage Between Presplit and Smooth Blasting of High Rock Slope

    Yingguo Hu;Wenbo Lu;Ming Chen;Peng Yan

  • An equivalent method for blasting vibration simulation

    Wenbo Lu;Jianhua Yang;Ming Chen;Chuangbing Zhou

  • 2D numerical analysis of rock damage induced by dynamic in-situ stress redistribution and blast loading in underground blasting excavation

    J.H. Yang;C. Yao;Q.H. Jiang;W.B. Lu

  • Mitigation of rock burst events by blasting techniques during deep-tunnel excavation

    Peng Yan;Zhenguo Zhao;Wenbo Lu;Yong Fan

  • Numerical Simulation of Rock Mass Damage Evolution During Deep-Buried Tunnel Excavation by Drill and Blast

    Jianhua Yang;Jianhua Yang;Wenbo Lu;Yingguo Hu;Ming Chen

  • Contributions of In-Situ Stress Transient Redistribution to Blasting Excavation Damage Zone of Deep Tunnels

    Peng Yan;Wen-bo Lu;Ming Chen;Ying-guo Hu

  • A study of excavation sequence and contour blasting method for underground powerhouses of hydropower stations

    Wenbo Lu;Ming Chen;Xiang Geng;Daqiang Shu

  • A system reliability approach for evaluating stability of rock wedges with correlated failure modes

    Dianqing Li;Chuangbing Zhou;Wenbo Lu;Qinghui Jiang

  • A Study on the Vibration Frequency of Blasting Excavation in Highly Stressed Rock Masses

    Jianhua Yang;Wenbo Lu;Qinghui Jiang;Chi Yao

  • XFEM based seismic potential failure mode analysis of concrete gravity dam–water–foundation systems through incremental dynamic analysis

    Gaohui Wang;Yongxiang Wang;Wenbo Lu;Chuangbing Zhou

  • Frequency comparison of blast-induced vibration per delay for the full-face millisecond delay blasting in underground opening excavation

    J.H. Yang;W.B. Lu;Q.H. Jiang;C. Yao

  • An introduction to Chinese safety regulations for blasting vibration

    Wen-bo Lu;Yi Luo;Ming Chen;Da-qiang Shu

  • A fault diagnosis scheme of rolling element bearing based on near-field acoustic holography and gray level co-occurrence matrix

    Wenbo Lu;Weikang Jiang;Haijun Wu;Junjian Hou

  • Influence of tunneling methods on the strainburst characteristics during the excavation of deep rock masses

    Yong Fan;Wenbo Lu;Yihong Zhou;Peng Yan

  • Numerical and experimental investigation of blasting damage control of a high rock slope in a deep valley

    Yingguo Hu;Wenbo Lu;Xinxia Wu;Meishan Liu

  • Modeling coupled processes of non-steady seepage flow and non-linear deformation for a concrete-faced rockfill dam

    Yifeng Chen;Ran Hu;Wenbo Lu;Dianqing Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Chuangbing Zhou
Chuangbing Zhou Nanchang University
Qinghui Jiang
Qinghui Jiang Wuhan University
Qianbing Zhang
Qianbing Zhang Monash University
Dian-Qing Li
Dian-Qing Li Wuhan University
Yi-Feng Chen
Yi-Feng Chen Wuhan University
Jian Zhao
Jian Zhao Monash University
Sheng-Qi Yang
Sheng-Qi Yang China University of Mining and Technology
Lei He
Lei He University of California, Los Angeles
Li Min Zhang
Li Min Zhang Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Hongwen Jing
Hongwen Jing China University of Mining and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA can open up a variety of career paths, many of which can start or advance through flexible online degree options. Beyond core engineering, students may explore interdisciplinary fields connected to technology, business, and design.

For those interested in the intersection of business and technology, a what can you do with a project management degree guide can help you understand the diverse roles available in industries like construction, IT, or engineering management. If you’re drawn to the fast-growing digital design sector, an ux design degree online can equip you with skills in user experience and interface design, which are in high demand.

Emerging fields like blockchain and financial technologies are also expanding rapidly—consider pursuing a crypto degree to position yourself at the forefront of innovation. Meanwhile, the property sector continues to merge tech and business, and enrolling in a cheap online real estate school can offer specialized opportunities for those interested in real estate technology and analytics.

Best Scientists Citing Wenbo Lu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles