World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 42 4697 4344 36 36 89 8446

Vivianne H.M. Visschers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vivianne H.M. Visschers between 2004 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vivianne H.M. Visschers published across 19 years, from 2004 to 2022, averaging 5.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2012. 7 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2012. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 3 publications
2004 2022

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vivianne H.M. Visschers: publications per year, 2004 to 2022
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 1
2007 2
2008 4
2009 6
2010 5
2011 9
2012 11
2013 6
2014 2
2015 8
2016 8
2017 4
2018 11
2019 10
2020 10
2021 4
2022 3
Total 105
Download as CSV

Vivianne H.M. Visschers publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vivianne H.M. Visschers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 84–93 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 89 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301 89
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Vivianne H.M. Visschers D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vivianne H.M. Visschers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313 42
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Vivianne H.M. Visschers is affiliated with the University of Applied Sciences and Arts Northwestern Switzerland in Switzerland. Their research falls primarily within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to subfields such as Food Science, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Pollution, Small Animals, and Applied Psychology.

Their work covers several main topics including Antibiotic Use and Resistance, Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts, Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability, Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment, and Food Safety and Hygiene.

Recent published papers by Vivianne H.M. Visschers include:

  • Smaller servings vs. information provision: Results of two interventions to reduce plate waste in two university canteens, 2020, Waste Management
  • Knowledge, Social Influences, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Cultural Values Explain the Public's Decisions Related to Prudent Antibiotic Use, 2021, Risk Analysis

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Claudia Freivogel (8 publications)
  • Isabel Lechner (2 publications)
  • Vanessa Feck (2 publications)
  • Daniela Gundlach (1 publication)
  • Claudio Beretta (1 publication)

The scientist has contributed to various academic venues, with multiple publications in the Institutional Repository (IHS Vienna) and Frontiers in Veterinary Science. Other venues include Waste Management, Frontiers in Public Health, and Risk Analysis.

Best Publications

  • Sorting out food waste behaviour: A survey on the motivators and barriers of self-reported amounts of food waste in households

    Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Nadine Wickli;Michael Siegrist

  • Eating green. Consumers' willingness to adopt ecological food consumption behaviors.

    Christina Tobler;Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Probability Information in Risk Communication: A Review of the Research Literature

    Vivianne H. M. Visschers;Ree M. Meertens;Wim W. F. Passchier;Nanne N. K. De Vries

  • How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster.

    Vivianne H. M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers' willingness to act and to support policy measures

    Christina Tobler;Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Knowledge as a driver of public perceptions about climate change reassessed

    Jing Shi;Vivianne H. M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist;Joseph Arvai

  • Eye tracking and nutrition label use: A review of the literature and recommendations for label enhancement

    Dan J. Graham;Jacob L. Orquin;Vivianne H.M. Visschers

  • Public Perception of Climate Change: The Importance of Knowledge and Cultural Worldviews

    Jing Shi;Vivianne H. M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model

    Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Carmen Keller;Michael Siegrist

  • Consumers’ knowledge about climate change

    Christina Tobler;Vivianne H. M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Health motivation and product design determine consumers' visual attention to nutrition information on food products.

    Vivianne H M Visschers;Rebecca Hess;Michael Siegrist

  • Acceptance of nuclear power: The Fukushima effect

    Michael Siegrist;Vivianne H.M. Visschers

  • Impact of knowledge and misconceptions on benefit and risk perception of CCS.

    Lasse Wallquist;Vivianne H. M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Factors influencing changes in sustainability perception of various food behaviors: Results of a longitudinal study

    Michael Siegrist;Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Christina Hartmann

  • Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants.

    Carmen Keller;Vivianne Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Public acceptance of CCS system elements: A conjoint measurement

    Lasse Wallquist;Selma L’Orange Seigo;Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Does environmental friendliness equal healthiness? Swiss consumers' perception of protein products.

    Gianna A. Lazzarini;Jasmin Zimmermann;Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • The role of health-related, motivational and sociodemographic aspects in predicting food label use: a comprehensive study.

    Rebecca Hess;Vivianne H M Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Fair play in energy policy decisions: Procedural fairness, outcome fairness and acceptance of the decision to rebuild nuclear power plants

    Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Find the differences and the similarities: Relating perceived benefits, perceived costs and protected values to acceptance of five energy technologies

    Vivianne H.M. Visschers;Michael Siegrist

  • Perceptions of antimicrobial usage, antimicrobial resistance and policy measures to reduce antimicrobial usage in convenient samples of Belgian, French, German, Swedish and Swiss pig farmers.

    V.H.M. Visschers;A. Backhans;L. Collineau;D. Iten

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeroen Dewulf
Jeroen Dewulf Ghent University
Ulf Emanuelson
Ulf Emanuelson Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Katharina D.C. Stärk
Katharina D.C. Stärk Royal Veterinary College
Nanne K. de Vries
Nanne K. de Vries Maastricht University
Robert A. C. Ruiter
Robert A. C. Ruiter Maastricht University
Danielle R.M. Timmermans
Danielle R.M. Timmermans Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities online is increasingly flexible and affordable. Many students opt for graduate programs such as the online MSW to prepare for impactful roles in social work and human services. If you're interested in working with individuals on behavioral issues, consider the online BCBA masters programs, which offer training for aspiring Board Certified Behavior Analysts.

Time is another important factor for busy professionals. For those who want to advance their careers quickly, accelerated MSW programs online allow you to complete your degree in a shorter timeframe. Similarly, accelerated psychology programs provide a fast track toward psychology roles in research, counseling, and beyond.

These degree options open doors to dynamic career pathways in counseling, education, human resources, social advocacy, and community leadership. When choosing a program, be mindful of accreditation, cost, and format to best fit your personal and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Vivianne H.M. Visschers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles