World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
41
Citations
7487
World Ranking
7646
National Ranking
479

Ulrike Langematz publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Langematz sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ulrike Langematz D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrike Langematz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrike Langematz is affiliated with Freie Universität Berlin in Germany and conducts research primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work focuses extensively on Atmospheric Science and Global and Planetary Change, with additional contributions to Astronomy and Astrophysics, Aerospace Engineering, and Materials Chemistry.

The main topics explored in Ulrike Langematz's research include Atmospheric Ozone and Climate, Climate variability and models, Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics, Radioactive contamination and transfer, and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research.

Langematz has contributed to several scientific publications. Notable recent papers include:

  • Sudden Stratospheric Warmings, 2020, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Modeling the Transport and Deposition of 10Be Produced by the Strongest Solar Proton Event During the Holocene, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • A critical evaluation of decadal solar cycle imprints in the MiKlip historical ensemble simulations, 2023, Weather and Climate Dynamics
  • Twenty-First-Century Climate Change Hot Spots in the Light of a Weakening Sun, 2020, Journal of Climate
  • Quantifying uncertainties of climate signals in chemistry climate models related to the 11-year solar cycle - Part 1: Annual mean response in heating rates, temperature, and ozone, 2020, Atmospheric chemistry and physics

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Langematz include Tobias Spiegl, Tatsuhiko Sato, K. Schaar, Markus Kunze, and Mark Baldwin.

Langematz's research is often published in specific scientific venues with repeated contributions to the Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. Other venues include Reviews of Geophysics, Weather and Climate Dynamics, and the Journal of Climate.

Best Publications

  • Sudden Stratospheric Warmings

    Mark P. Baldwin;Blanca Ayarzagüena;Thomas Birner;Thomas Birner;Neal Butchart

  • Simulations of anthropogenic change in the strength of the Brewer–Dobson circulation

    N. Butchart;A. A. Scaife;M. Bourqui;M. Bourqui;J. de Grandpre

  • Solar forcing for CMIP6 (v3.2)

    Katja Matthes;Katja Matthes;Bernd Funke;Monika E. Andersson;Luke Barnard

  • An update of observed stratospheric temperature trends

    William J. Randel;Keith P. Shine;John Austin;John Barnett

  • Recent variability of the solar spectral irradiance and its impact on climate modelling

    I. Ermolli;K. Matthes;T. Dudok de Wit;N. A. Krivova

  • Overview of IGAC/SPARC Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) Community Simulations in Support of Upcoming Ozone and Climate Assessments

    Veronika Eyring;Jean-François Lamarque;Peter Hess;Florian Arfeuille

  • A comparison of model-simulated trends in stratospheric temperatures

    K. P. Shine;M. S. Bourqui;P. M. de F. Forster;S. H. E. Hare

  • Multi-model assessment of stratospheric ozone return dates and ozone recovery in CCMVal-2 models

    V. Eyring;I. Cionni;G. E. Bodeker;Andrew J. Charlton-Perez

  • Transfer of the solar signal from the stratosphere to the troposphere: Northern winter

    Katja Matthes;Katja Matthes;Yuhji Kuroda;Kunihiko Kodera;Ulrike Langematz

  • The GCM–Reality Intercomparison Project for SPARC (GRIPS): Scientific Issues and Initial Results

    Steven Pawson;Steven Pawson;Steven Pawson;K. Kodera;K. Hamilton;T. G. Shepherd

  • The Brewer-Dobson circulation and total ozone from seasonal to decadal time scales

    Mark Weber;S. Dikty;J.P. Burrows;Hella Garny

  • Improved 11-year solar signal in the Freie Universität Berlin Climate Middle Atmosphere Model (FUB-CMAM)

    Katja Matthes;Ulrike Langematz;Lesley L. Gray;Kunihiko Kodera

  • Estimates of Ozone Return Dates from Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative Simulations

    Sandip S. Dhomse;Douglas Kinnison;Martyn P. Chipperfield;Ross J. Salawitch

  • Climate change projections and stratosphere–troposphere interaction

    Adam A. Scaife;Thomas Spangehl;David R. Fereday;Ulrich Cubasch

  • Thermal and dynamical changes of the stratosphere since 1979 and their link to ozone and CO2 changes

    Ulrike Langematz;Markus Kunze;Kirstin Krüger;Karin Labitzke

  • Tropical Cumulus Convection and Upward Propagating Waves in Middle Atmospheric Gcms

    T. Horinouchi;S. Pawson;S. Pawson;K. Shibata;U. Langematz

  • Update on the global ozone climatology and on concurrent ozone and temperature trends

    Jan P.F. Fortuin;Ulrike Langematz

  • Projections of UV radiation changes in the 21st century: impact of ozone recovery and cloud effects

    Alkiviadis F. Bais;Kleareti Tourpali;Andreas Kazantzidis;Hideharu Akiyoshi

  • Evaluation of radiation scheme performance within chemistry climate models

    Piers M. Forster;Victor I. Fomichev;Eugene Rozanov;Chiara Cagnazzo

  • Chemical effects in 11-year solar cycle simulations with the Freie Universität Berlin Climate Middle Atmosphere Model with online chemistry (FUB-CMAM-CHEM)

    Ulrike Langematz;J. Lee Grenfell;J. Lee Grenfell;Katja Matthes;Katja Matthes;Peter Mieth

  • 100 Years of Progress in Understanding the Stratosphere and Mesosphere

    Mark P. Baldwin;Thomas Birner;Guy Brasseur;John Burrows

Frequent Co-Authors

Katja Matthes
Katja Matthes GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Heike Rauer
Heike Rauer Freie Universität Berlin
Martin Dameris
Martin Dameris German Aerospace Center
Eugene Rozanov
Eugene Rozanov Saint Petersburg State University
Patrick Jöckel
Patrick Jöckel German Aerospace Center
Slimane Bekki
Slimane Bekki Sorbonne University
Steven Pawson
Steven Pawson Goddard Space Flight Center
Kiyotaka Shibata
Kiyotaka Shibata Kochi University of Technology
Martyn P. Chipperfield
Martyn P. Chipperfield University of Leeds
Neal Butchart
Neal Butchart Met Office

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and enhance expertise. Many professionals pursue advanced education to dive deeper into sustainable practices, policy-making, or educational roles. For example, educators might consider programs such as online edd programs no dissertation to advance in leadership positions without the lengthy dissertation requirement.

Additionally, those aiming to transition from teaching roles into administration or specialist positions can benefit from the best online eds to edd programs. These pathways often focus on applied knowledge and practical leadership skills that support environmental education and community initiatives.

For professionals looking to expand into social aspects of environmental work, such as community advocacy or social justice in environmental policy, affordable options like the cheapest online dsw programs provide valuable credentials without financial strain. These programs emphasize social work’s role in holistic environmental health.

Lastly, considering a more interdisciplinary approach, programs found in online general studies degree affordable categories offer flexibility to integrate environmental sciences with other fields. This versatility supports a wide range of career paths from research to advocacy and policy development.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrike Langematz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles