World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tamar Nijsten

Tamar Nijsten

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
26387
World Ranking
14617
National Ranking
557

Tamar Nijsten publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Nijsten sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 371 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Tamar Nijsten D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tamar Nijsten sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tamar Nijsten is affiliated with Erasmus MC in the Netherlands and holds a significant publication record within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Dermatology, Oncology, and Epidemiology. Their research covers an extensive range of subfields, including Molecular Biology and Immunology and Allergy.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
  • Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Asthma and Respiratory Diseases
  • Skin Protection and Aging
  • Cutaneous Lymphoproliferative Disorders Research

Tamar Nijsten has contributed numerous publications to prominent academic venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • British Journal of Dermatology
  • Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • JEADV Clinical Practice
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Acta Dermato Venereologica

Their recent research contributions include the following papers:

  • "Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study," 2020, European Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Prevalence of most common skin diseases in Europe: a population-based study," 2022, Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
  • "Akkermansia muciniphila and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii in Immune-Related Diseases," 2022, Microorganisms
  • "Genome-wide association study in almost 195,000 individuals identifies 50 previously unidentified genetic loci for eye color," 2021, Science Advances
  • "An artificial intelligence based app for skin cancer detection evaluated in a population based setting," 2023, npj Digital Medicine

Collaboration is evident in their career, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Marlies Wakkee
  • Loes M. Hollestein
  • Luba M. Pardo
  • Antien L. Mooyaart
  • Marjolein Lugtenberg

Their work largely intersects clinical and molecular perspectives on skin diseases and related immune and oncological conditions, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within medical research. Tamar Nijsten remains an active contributor to the scientific community through their extensive involvement in research on dermatological conditions and their broader implications for public health.

Best Publications

  • Definition of treatment goals for moderate to severe psoriasis: a European consensus

    U. Mrowietz;K. Kragballe;K. Reich;P. Spuls

  • Psoriasis Is Common, Carries a Substantial Burden Even When Not Extensive, and Is Associated with Widespread Treatment Dissatisfaction

    Robert S. Stern;Tamar Nijsten;T. Steven R. Feldman;David J. Margolis

  • European S3-guidelines on the systemic treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

    D Pathirana;AD Ormerod;P Saiag;Catherine Smith

  • Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: a meta-analysis.

    Renate van den Bos;Lidia Arends;Michael Kockaert;Martino Neumann

  • Epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis in the population of the United States.

    Joel M. Gelfand;Dafna D. Gladman;Philip J. Mease;Nana Smith

  • The Rotterdam Study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results.

    M. Arfan Ikram;Guy G. O. Brusselle;Guy G. O. Brusselle;Sarwa Darwish Murad;Cornelia M. van Duijn

  • Objectives, design and main findings until 2020 from the Rotterdam Study.

    M Arfan Ikram;Guy Brusselle;Guy Brusselle;Mohsen Ghanbari;André Goedegebure

  • The global burden of melanoma: results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

    Chante Karimkhani;A. C. Green;A. C. Green;T. Nijsten;Martin A. Weinstock;Martin A. Weinstock

  • The Prevalence and Odds of Depressive Symptoms and Clinical Depression in Psoriasis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Emmilia A. Dowlatshahi;Marlies Wakkee;Lidia R. Arends;Tamar Nijsten

  • Critical Review of Generic and Dermatology-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life Instruments

    Hilde Both;Marie-Louise Essink-Bot;Jan Busschbach;Tamar Nijsten

  • The prevalence of psoriasis in African Americans: results from a population-based study.

    Joel M. Gelfand;Robert S. Stern;Tamar Nijsten;Steven R. Feldman

  • Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of eHealth Interventions in Somatic Diseases: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Niels J Elbert;Harmieke van Os-Medendorp;Wilco van Renselaar;Anne G Ekeland

  • The increased risk of skin cancer is persistent after discontinuation of psoralen+ultraviolet A: a cohort study.

    Tamar E.C. Nijsten;Robert S. Stern

  • Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins

    Anke A.M. Biemans;Michael Kockaert;George P. Akkersdijk;Renate R. van den Bos

  • Gender Differences in Melanoma Survival: Female Patients Have a Decreased Risk of Metastasis

    Arjen Joosse;Esther de Vries;Renate Eckel;Tamar Nijsten

  • How Good Are Clinical Severity and Outcome Measures for Psoriasis?: Quantitative Evaluation in a Systematic Review

    Phyllis I. Spuls;Lidian L.A. Lecluse;Marie-Louise N.F. Poulsen;Jan D. Bos

  • Trends in incidence and predictions of cutaneous melanoma across Europe up to 2015

    M Arnold;C Holterhues;L M Hollestein;J W W Coebergh

  • Prevalence of actinic keratosis and its risk factors in the general population: The rotterdam study

    Sophie C Flohil;Robert J T van der Leest;Emmilia A Dowlatshahi;Albert Hofman

  • Superior Outcome of Women With Stage I/II Cutaneous Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of Four European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase III Trials

    Arjen Joosse;Sandra Collette;Stefan Suciu;Tamar Nijsten

  • Endovenous therapies of lower extremity varicosities: A meta-analysis

    Renate van den Bos;L. Arenas;Michael Kockaert;Martino Neumann

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert S. Stern
Robert S. Stern Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
André G. Uitterlinden
André G. Uitterlinden Erasmus University Rotterdam
Steven R. Feldman
Steven R. Feldman Wake Forest University
Oscar H. Franco
Oscar H. Franco University Medical Center Utrecht
Albert Hofman
Albert Hofman Harvard University
Guy Brusselle
Guy Brusselle Ghent University Hospital
David J. Margolis
David J. Margolis University of Pennsylvania
M. Arfan Ikram
M. Arfan Ikram Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jiali Han
Jiali Han Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Kari Stefansson
Kari Stefansson deCODE Genetics (Iceland)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative or complementary health-related degrees can open various career opportunities in the medical field. For Registered Nurses seeking to become Nurse Practitioners, flexible asn to np bridge programs offer a direct pathway for advancing clinical and leadership skills.

If you're interested in promoting wellness, consider earning a nutrition degree online. These programs prepare graduates for roles in community health, dietetics, and wellness coaching—key components of preventive healthcare.

For those with an interest in healthcare management, cahme-accredited online Master of Health Administration (MHA) degrees provide specialized training recognized by top employers. These programs focus on the business and organizational aspects of medicine.

Prospective RNs may also ask, does rn to bsn require clinicals? Many online RN to BSN programs now offer options that minimize or waive clinical requirements, making it easier for working nurses to advance their education.

Best Scientists Citing Tamar Nijsten

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles