World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Takeshi Morimoto

Takeshi Morimoto

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17423 16371 557 525 1020 27713

Takeshi Morimoto publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Takeshi Morimoto between 1959 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Takeshi Morimoto published across 67 years, from 1959 to 2025, averaging 18 papers a year. Output peaked at 115 publications in 2021. 142 of the 1,207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75 100
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 115. Peak 115 publications in 2021. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 9 publications 1984: 6 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 25 publications 2009: 27 publications 2010: 38 publications 2011: 38 publications 2012: 39 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 36 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 78 publications 2018: 73 publications 2019: 79 publications 2020: 94 publications 2021: 115 publications 2022: 79 publications 2023: 72 publications 2024: 84 publications 2025: 58 publications
1959 2025

1,207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Takeshi Morimoto: publications per year, 1959 to 2025
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 3
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 9
1984 6
1985 4
1986 1
1987 3
1988 2
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 2
1993 4
1994 3
1995 5
1996 12
1997 12
1998 11
1999 12
2000 5
2001 3
2002 9
2003 3
2004 15
2005 6
2006 10
2007 16
2008 25
2009 27
2010 38
2011 38
2012 39
2013 41
2014 28
2015 36
2016 37
2017 78
2018 73
2019 79
2020 94
2021 115
2022 79
2023 72
2024 84
2025 58
Total 1,207
Download as CSV

Takeshi Morimoto publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Takeshi Morimoto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,001–1,020 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,020 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77 1,020
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Takeshi Morimoto D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Takeshi Morimoto sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Takeshi Morimoto is affiliated with Kindai University in Japan and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research portfolio features a substantial number of publications addressing critical aspects of cardiovascular health, spanning various subfields including surgery, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and internal medicine.

Their work engages deeply with key topics such as atrial fibrillation management and outcomes, venous thromboembolism diagnosis and management, acute ischemic stroke management, and coronary interventions and diagnostics. Antiplatelet therapy in cardiovascular diseases, acute myocardial infarction research, and cardiac imaging and diagnostics also represent prominent areas in their scholarly output.

Frequent publication venues for Takeshi Morimoto include several high-impact journals:

  • Circulation Journal
  • The American Journal of Cardiology
  • European Heart Journal
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

Among recent papers associated with their research contributions are:

  • "Endovascular Therapy for Acute Stroke with a Large Ischemic Region" (2022, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Comparison of Clopidogrel Monotherapy After 1 to 2 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy With 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome" (2022, JAMA Cardiology)
  • "Prevalence of post-intensive care syndrome among Japanese intensive care unit patients: a prospective, multicenter, observational J-PICS study" (2021, Critical Care)
  • "An Aspirin-Free Versus Dual Antiplatelet Strategy for Coronary Stenting: STOPDAPT-3 Randomized Trial" (2023, Circulation)
  • "Association with Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score and In-hospital Mortality and Infection in Acute Heart Failure" (2020, Scientific Reports)

Takeshi Morimoto has collaborated extensively with several researchers, frequently working alongside:

  • Takeshi Kimura
  • Kenji Andò
  • Kazushige Kadota
  • Yugo Yamashita
  • Hiroki Shiomi

The scope and depth of Morimoto's research contribute to ongoing studies in cardiovascular medicine with a particular emphasis on improving diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for acute and chronic cardiac conditions.

Best Publications

  • Low-Dose Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Atherosclerotic Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Hisao Ogawa;Masafumi Nakayama;Takeshi Morimoto;Shiro Uemura

  • Predicting Successful Guidewire Crossing Through Chronic Total Occlusion of Native Coronary Lesions Within 30 Minutes : The J-CTO (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan) Score as a Difficulty Grading and Time Assessment Tool

    Yoshihiro Morino;Mitsuru Abe;Takeshi Morimoto;Takeshi Kimura

  • Training and simulation for patient safety

    Rajesh Aggarwal;Oliver T. Mytton;Milliard Derbrew;David Hananel

  • Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI: The STOPDAPT-2 Randomized Clinical Trial

    Hirotoshi Watanabe;Takenori Domei;Takeshi Morimoto;Masahiro Natsuaki

  • Adverse drug events and medication errors: detection and classification methods

    T Morimoto;T K Gandhi;A C Seger;T C Hsieh

  • Effect of Intensive Statin Therapy on Regression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome : A Multicenter Randomized Trial Evaluated by Volumetric Intravascular Ultrasound Using Pitavastatin Versus Atorvastatin (JAPAN-ACS [Japan Assessment of Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin in Acute Coronary Syndrome] Study)

    Takafumi Hiro;Takeshi Kimura;Takeshi Morimoto;Katsumi Miyauchi

  • In-hospital outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic total occlusion insights from the J-CTO Registry (Multicenter CTO Registry in Japan).

    Yoshihiro Morino;Takeshi Kimura;Yasuhiko Hayashi;Toshiya Muramatsu

  • High Incidence of NLRP3 Somatic Mosaicism in Patients With Chronic Infantile Neurologic, Cutaneous, Articular Syndrome: Results of an International Multicenter Collaborative Study

    Naoko Tanaka;Kazushi Izawa;Megumu K. Saito;Mio Sakuma

  • Effects of aspirin on risks of vascular events and cancer according to bodyweight and dose: analysis of individual patient data from randomised trials.

    Peter M Rothwell;Nancy R Cook;Nancy R Cook;J Michael Gaziano;Jacqueline F Price

  • Initial Surgical Versus Conservative Strategies in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.

    Tomohiko Taniguchi;Takeshi Morimoto;Hiroki Shiomi;Kenji Ando

  • Early Immune-Related Adverse Events and Association with Outcome in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab: A Prospective Cohort Study.

    Shunsuke Teraoka;Daichi Fujimoto;Takeshi Morimoto;Hayato Kawachi

  • Very late stent thrombosis and late target lesion revascularization after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: five-year outcome of the j-Cypher Registry.

    Takeshi Kimura;Takeshi Morimoto;Yoshihisa Nakagawa;Kazuya Kawai

  • Comparisons of Baseline Demographics, Clinical Presentation, and Long-Term Outcome Among Patients With Early, Late, and Very Late Stent Thrombosis of Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Observations From the Registry of Stent Thrombosis for Review and Reevaluation (RESTART)

    Takeshi Kimura;Takeshi Morimoto;Ken Kozuma;Yasuhiro Honda

  • Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent : A Randomized, Controlled, Noninferiority Trial

    Masahiro Natsuaki;Ken Kozuma;Takeshi Morimoto;Kazushige Kadota

  • Peritoneal washing cytology: prognostic value of positive findings in patients with gastric carcinoma undergoing a potentially curative resection.

    Yasuhiro Kodera;Yoshitaka Yamamura;Yasuhiro Shimizu;Akihito Torii

  • An evaluation of risk factors for adverse drug events associated with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors

    Takeshi Morimoto;Takeshi Morimoto;Takeshi Morimoto;Tejal K. Gandhi;Tejal K. Gandhi;Julie M. Fiskio;Andrew C. Seger

  • Survival after curative resection for mucinous adenocarcinoma of the colorectum.

    Yukihide Kanemitsu;Tomoyuki Kato;Takashi Hirai;Kenzo Yasui

  • Association of onset to balloon and door to balloon time with long term clinical outcome in patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction having primary percutaneous coronary intervention: observational study

    Hiroki Shiomi;Yoshihisa Nakagawa;Takeshi Morimoto;Yutaka Furukawa

  • Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Mortality and Ventilator-Free Days in Patients Requiring Mechanical Ventilation With Sepsis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Yu Kawazoe;Kyohei Miyamoto;Takeshi Morimoto;Tomonori Yamamoto

  • Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents 1-Year Outcomes from the Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-Eluting Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial (RESET)

    Takeshi Kimura;Takeshi Morimoto;Masahiro Natsuaki;Hiroki Shiomi

Frequent Co-Authors

Takeshi Kimura
Takeshi Kimura Kyoto University
Yasuhiro Kodera
Yasuhiro Kodera Nagoya University
Toru Kita
Toru Kita Kyoto University
Hisao Ogawa
Hisao Ogawa Kumamoto University
Minoru Horie
Minoru Horie Shiga University of Medical Science
Yoshihiko Saito
Yoshihiko Saito Nara Medical University
Atsushi Nakagawa
Atsushi Nakagawa Osaka University
David W. Bates
David W. Bates Brigham and Women's Hospital
Toshio Heike
Toshio Heike Kyoto University
Masunori Matsuzaki
Masunori Matsuzaki Yamaguchi University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the healthcare field, but not sure if medical school is the right path? There are several affordable and rewarding online programs that can launch your career in healthcare, even without a medical degree.

Technology-driven students may consider a health information technology online degree. This pathway prepares you for roles managing patient records, data security, and healthcare IT systems.

If you’re detail-oriented, look into the medical coding certification cost and programs. These certifications allow you to work in medical billing and coding, which are vital for the business side of healthcare.

For those aiming to provide direct care, there are many cheapest fnp programs online that train you to become a Family Nurse Practitioner—a high-demand, advanced nursing role.

If nursing appeals to you and you want to fast-track your education, explore the cheapest online accelerated bsn programs. These programs help you become a registered nurse in less time, with flexible online options.

Exploring these online degrees opens doors to fulfilling, high-impact careers in healthcare—often at a lower cost and with greater convenience than traditional medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Takeshi Morimoto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles