World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Susanne Ferber

Susanne Ferber

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8560 7994 572 538 126 6429
Neuroscience 39 8308 7673 486 444 130 6429

Susanne Ferber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Susanne Ferber between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Susanne Ferber published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 4.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2010. 7 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2010. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1998 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Susanne Ferber: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 1
2000 5
2001 4
2002 3
2003 3
2004 0
2005 4
2006 3
2007 4
2008 5
2009 2
2010 18
2011 4
2012 8
2013 6
2014 5
2015 9
2016 9
2017 8
2018 7
2019 2
2020 6
2021 4
2022 1
2023 6
2024 4
2025 3
Total 135
Download as CSV

Susanne Ferber publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne Ferber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 130 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469 130
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Susanne Ferber D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne Ferber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 39
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Susanne Ferber is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, specializing primarily in neuroscience with a focused expertise in cognitive neuroscience. Their scholarly work frequently appears in prominent publication venues, notably including the Journal of Vision, where they have contributed to 13 publications, as well as in the Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, Scientific Reports, Brain and Cognition, and Cognition.

Ferber's research explores a variety of topics within neuroscience, with particular attention to visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and the broader field of cognitive neuroscience. Other areas addressed in their work include human-automation interaction and safety, multisensory perception and integration, autism spectrum disorder research, and neuroscience and neural engineering.

Several recent papers highlight Ferber's contributions to understanding visual working memory and cognitive processing. These include:

  • Visual working memory and sensory processing in autistic children, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Visual working memory deficits following right brain damage, 2020, Brain and Cognition
  • Tuning the ensemble: Incidental skewing of the perceptual average through memory-driven selection., 2021, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance
  • Directed avoidance and its effect on visual working memory, 2020, Cognition
  • Proactive interference of visual working memory chunks implicates long-term memory, 2024, Memory & Cognition

Ferber frequently collaborates with several coauthors, most notably Jay Pratt and Ryan Williams, with whom they have coauthored eleven and ten papers respectively. Other regular collaborators include Logan Doyle, Justin Ruppel, and Morgan D. Barense.

Their scientific contributions cover both fundamental and applied aspects of cognitive neuroscience and visual working memory, often intersecting with developmental and social psychology subfields. This cross-disciplinary approach integrates multiple dimensions of experimental and cognitive psychology, emphasizing the neural and behavioral underpinnings of human perception and memory systems.

Best Publications

  • Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe

    Hans-Otto Karnath;Susanne Ferber;Marc Himmelbach

  • How to assess spatial neglect--line bisection or cancellation tasks?

    Susanne Ferber;Hans-Otto Karnath

  • The origin of contraversive pushing Evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans

    Hans-Otto Karnath;Susanne Ferber;Johannes Dichgans

  • The neural representation of postural control in humans.

    Hans-Otto Karnath;Susanne Ferber;Johannes Dichgans

  • Sporadic cerebellar ataxia associated with gluten sensitivity.

    K Bürk;S Bösch;C A Müller;A Melms

  • Revisiting unilateral neglect

    James Danckert;Susanne Ferber

  • The impact of multisensory integration deficits on speech perception in children with autism spectrum disorders.

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Magali Segers;Susanne Ferber;Morgan D. Barense

  • Eye movements tell only half the story.

    S. Ferber;J. Danckert;M. Joanisse;H. C. Goltz

  • Multisensory speech perception in autism spectrum disorder: From phoneme to whole-word perception.

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Sarah H. Baum;Magali Segers;Susanne Ferber

  • The associations between multisensory temporal processing and symptoms of schizophrenia

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Sohee Park;Channing Cochran;Lindsey G. McIntosh

  • Direct effects of prismatic lenses on visuomotor control: an event-related functional MRI study.

    James Danckert;Susanne Ferber;Melvyn A. Goodale

  • Competition increases binding errors in visual working memory.

    Stephen M. Emrich;Stephen M. Emrich;Susanne Ferber

  • Neglected Time: Impaired Temporal Perception of Multisecond Intervals in Unilateral Neglect

    James Danckert;Susanne Ferber;Carson Pun;Carol Broderick

  • The cascading influence of multisensory processing on speech perception in autism

    Ryan A Stevenson;Magali Segers;Busisiwe L Ncube;Karen R Black

  • Visual search elicits the electrophysiological marker of visual working memory.

    Stephen M. Emrich;Naseem Al-Aidroos;Jay Pratt;Susanne Ferber

  • Selective, non-lateralized impairment of motor imagery following right parietal damage.

    James Danckert;Susanne Ferber;Timothy Doherty;Helena Steinmetz

  • Keeping time in the brain: Autism spectrum disorder and audiovisual temporal processing

    Ryan A. Stevenson;Magali Segers;Susanne Ferber;Morgan D. Barense

  • Parietal and occipital lobe contributions to perception of straight ahead orientation

    Susanne Ferber;Hans-Otto Karnath

  • Prognosis of contraversive pushing

    H.-O. Karnath;L. Johannsen;D. Broetz;S. Ferber

  • The Lateral Occipital Complex Subserves the Perceptual Persistence of Motion-defined Groupings

    Susanne Ferber;G. Keith Humphrey;Tutis Vilis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay Pratt
Jay Pratt University of Toronto
Morgan D. Barense
Morgan D. Barense University of Toronto
Ryan A. Stevenson
Ryan A. Stevenson University of Western Ontario
Hans-Otto Karnath
Hans-Otto Karnath University of Tübingen
James Danckert
James Danckert University of Waterloo
Melvyn A. Goodale
Melvyn A. Goodale University of Western Ontario
Johannes Dichgans
Johannes Dichgans University of Tübingen
Mark T. Wallace
Mark T. Wallace Vanderbilt University
Sandra E. Black
Sandra E. Black University of Toronto
Heinrich H. Bülthoff
Heinrich H. Bülthoff Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience intersects with several key disciplines, offering a variety of online degrees that can strengthen your career prospects in both clinical and research settings. For those seeking a flexible and affordable entry point, consider a cheap online psychology degree. This can provide foundational knowledge relevant to neuroscience and mental health careers.

If you’re interested in social work as part of your neuroscience journey, exploring msw programs with high acceptance rate can simplify the application process and broaden your options for impact in mental health fields.

Many neuroscience graduates consider further specialization, such as clinical psychology. For these ambitions, psy d programs offer advanced online clinical training, preparing you for practice or research in behavioral health.

Alternatively, those interested in therapy and counseling may benefit from investigating online mft programs, which can be completed over a shorter timeframe and prepare graduates to work in family and marriage therapy—an area closely related to neuroscience.

Exploring these related online degree pathways can open rewarding careers that connect the science of the brain with the realities of helping people.

Best Scientists Citing Susanne Ferber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles