What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Henner Brinkmann focuses on Genetics, Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetic tree, Phylogenomics and Phylogenetics.
His research in the fields of Gene duplication, Zebrafish and Nuclear gene overlaps with other disciplines such as Osteoglossiformes and Hox gene.
As part of one scientific family, Henner Brinkmann deals mainly with the area of Evolutionary biology, narrowing it down to issues related to the Genome, and often Vertebrate, Latimeria, Living fossil and Coelacanth.
His study explores the link between Phylogenetic tree and topics such as Mixture model that cross with problems in Data set, Maximum parsimony and Contrast.
His Phylogenomics research includes elements of Panarthropoda, Tree of life, Protostome and Ecdysozoa.
His Phylogenetics research includes themes of Entamoeba and Mycetozoa, Dictyostelium.
His most cited work include:
- Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates (1240 citations)
- Phylogenomics and the reconstruction of the tree of life. (931 citations)
- Resolving Difficult Phylogenetic Questions: Why More Sequences Are Not Enough (724 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetics, Phylogenetic tree and Gene.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Botany, Paleontology, Genome, Long branch attraction and Phylogenomics in addition to Evolutionary biology.
His study in Phylogenomics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Zoology, Tree of life and Computational biology.
His Phylogenetics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Plastid and Genomics.
His work in the fields of Horizontal gene transfer, Monophyly and Tree of life overlaps with other areas such as Tree.
He has included themes like Zebrafish and Osteoglossomorpha in his Gene duplication study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Genetics (40.00%)
- Evolutionary biology (33.00%)
- Phylogenetics (31.00%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2010-2021)?
- Evolutionary biology (33.00%)
- Phylogenetics (31.00%)
- Genome (19.00%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Evolutionary biology, Phylogenetics, Genome, Phylogenetic tree and Genetics.
His work in Evolutionary biology addresses issues such as Viridiplantae, which are connected to fields such as Coalescent theory, Missing data, Paleontology and Sister group.
His Phylogenetics research incorporates themes from Endosymbiosis and Plastid.
His Genome research incorporates elements of Gene duplication, Phylogenetic network, Vertebrate and Prochlorococcus.
His research integrates issues of Data sequences and Metagenomics in his study of Phylogenetic tree.
His study in the field of Plasmid, Roseobacter, Bilateria and Deuterostome also crosses realms of Rhamnose.
Between 2010 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Resolving Difficult Phylogenetic Questions: Why More Sequences Are Not Enough (724 citations)
- The African coelacanth genome provides insights into tetrapod evolution (472 citations)
- Acoelomorph flatworms are deuterostomes related to Xenoturbella (326 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His main research concerns Evolutionary biology, Phylogenomics, Genome, Phylogenetic tree and Vertebrate.
His Evolutionary biology research integrates issues from Viridiplantae, Sister group and Zygnematales, Coleochaetales, Charales.
His study looks at the relationship between Phylogenomics and topics such as Monophyly, which overlap with Arthropod, Zoology, Jakobid and Pancrustacea.
His Phylogenetic tree research entails a greater understanding of Genetics.
His studies in Vertebrate integrate themes in fields like Genome evolution, Latimeria, Coelacanth, Comparative genomics and Living fossil.
His research in Phylogenetics intersects with topics in Inference and Nuclear gene.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
