World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Susanne Bødker

Susanne Bødker

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
13510
World Ranking
5782
National Ranking
17

Susanne Bødker publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne Bødker sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Susanne Bødker D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Susanne Bødker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Susanne Bødker is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and specializes in research primarily within the fields of Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting. Their work focuses notably on Human-Computer Interaction and related subfields, with an emphasis on innovative interactions between humans and technology, usability, and the design and management of technological systems.

Their academic contributions include a range of recent papers exploring diverse aspects of human-centered computing and interaction. Notable publications include:

  • Generative Theories of Interaction, 2021, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Efficiency and Care in Community-led Initiatives, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Participatory Design, 2021, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics
  • Collectives and Their Artifact Ecologies, 2022, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • Achieving Symmetry in Synchronous Interaction in Hybrid Work is Impossible, 2024, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

Bødker's research themes encompass several interconnected topics, including:

  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
  • Usability and User Interface Design
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Personal Information Management and User Behavior
  • Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Design Education and Practice

The scientist has collaborated frequently with colleagues such as Ole Sejer Iversen, Rachel Charlotte Smith, Christian Dindler, Eve Hoggan, and Henrik Korsgaard. These collaborations have contributed to a substantial number of joint publications in leading venues.

Common publication venues for Bødker's research include:

  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Publication Server of Bonn-Rhein-Sieg University of Applied Sciences

In addition to articles, Bødker has authored books published by recognized outlets, such as the Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics, including the title Participatory Design (2022). Another publication includes an oral history interview released by the Association for Computing Machinery in 2022.

The scope of their studies includes contributions to technology management and innovation, intersecting computer science applications with sociological and political science perspectives. This multidisciplinary approach reflects a comprehensive engagement with both the technical and social dimensions of human-computer interaction and information systems.

Best Publications

  • Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach To User Interface Design

    Susanne Bødker

  • When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges

    Susanne Bødker

  • Scenarios in user-centred design—setting the stage for reflection and action

    Susanne Bødker

  • Beyond the interface: encountering artifacts in use

    Liam J. Bannon;Susanne Bødker

  • Constructing common information spaces

    Liam Bannon;Susanne Bødker

  • Creating conditions for participation: conflicts and resources in systems development

    Susanne Bødker

  • A human activity approach to user interfaces

    Susanne Bødker

  • Cooperative design: techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene

    Susanne Bødker;Kaj Grønbæk;Morten Kyng

  • Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction

    Susanne Bødker

  • Participatory Design that Matters—Facing the Big Issues

    Susanne Bødker;Morten Kyng

  • Third-wave HCI, 10 years later---participation and sharing

    Susanne Bødker

  • Cooperative prototyping: users and designers in mutual activity

    Susanne Bødker;Kaj Grønbæk

  • Co-operative Design — perspectives on 20 years with 'the Scandinavian IT Design Model'

    Susanne Bødker;Pelle Ehn;Dan Sjögren;Yngve Sundblad

  • From implementation to design: tailoring and the emergence of systematization in CSCW

    Randall H. Trigg;Susanne Bødker

  • Design in action: from prototyping by demonstration to cooperative prototyping

    Susanne Bødker;Kaj Grønbæk

  • Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    Wendy E. Mackay;Stephen Brewster;Susanne Bødker

  • Staging a professional participatory design practice: moving PD beyond the initial fascination of user involvement

    Susanne Bødker;Ole Sejer Iversen

  • Tying Knots: Participatory Infrastructuring at Work

    Susanne BØdker;Christian Dindler;Ole Sejer Iversen

  • The design collaboratorium: a place for usability design

    Susanne Bødker;Jacob Buur

  • Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction

    R. Beale;C. Peter;L. Palen;S. Bodker

  • Understanding representation in design

    Susanne Bødker

  • CHAPTER 11 – Activity Theory

    Olav W. Bertelsen;Susanne Bødker

Frequent Co-Authors

Kaj Grønbæk
Kaj Grønbæk Aarhus University
Liam J. Bannon
Liam J. Bannon University of Limerick
Stephen Brewster
Stephen Brewster University of Glasgow
Wendy E. Mackay
Wendy E. Mackay University of Paris-Saclay
John M. Carroll
John M. Carroll University of Sussex
Jonathan Grudin
Jonathan Grudin University of Washington
Leysia Palen
Leysia Palen University of Colorado Boulder
Volker Wulf
Volker Wulf University of Siegen
Kasper Hornbæk
Kasper Hornbæk University of Copenhagen
Phoebe Sengers
Phoebe Sengers Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and promising career pathways. For those interested in data analysis and AI, pursuing an affordable data science degree can provide the specialized skills needed for high-demand roles, all while keeping education costs in check.

If your interests lean toward hardware, systems, or electronics, consider looking into top online electrical engineering schools. These programs often provide the flexibility of remote learning while connecting you to advanced technical knowledge and industry trends.

Short on time or looking for a quick career boost? There are many easy certifications that pay well, helping you rapidly build in-demand skills without a full degree commitment.

For professionals seeking advancement, a fastest online master's degree can lead to management roles and higher salaries in less time than traditional programs.

No matter your background, these flexible online options can help you chart a rewarding tech career from anywhere in the world.

Best Scientists Citing Susanne Bødker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles