What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of study are Law, Law and economics, Quality, Judicial opinion and Independence.
His study in Politics and High Court is carried out as part of his Law studies.
His Law and economics research incorporates themes from Settlement, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities fraud and Reciprocity.
In his study, State is inextricably linked to Public administration, which falls within the broad field of Quality.
His Judicial opinion research focuses on Elevation and how it relates to Accounting.
His studies deal with areas such as Test and Conventional wisdom as well as Independence.
His most cited work include:
- Are Judges Overpaid?: A Skeptical Response to the Judicial Salary Debate (86 citations)
- Professionals or Politicians: The Uncertain Empirical Case for an Elected Rather Than Appointed Judiciary (83 citations)
- Do the Merits Matter Less After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (75 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Stephen J. Choi spends much of his time researching Accounting, Law and economics, Law, Shareholder and Plaintiff.
Stephen J. Choi has researched Accounting in several fields, including Private placement, Enforcement, Intervention, Welfare and Stock market.
His work deals with themes such as Competition, Boilerplate text, Corporate law, Bond and Payment, which intersect with Law and economics.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Law, Empirical research are connected with Arbitration and Insider trading and other disciplines.
The Shareholder study combines topics in areas such as Proxy, Voting and Capital market.
His study in Plaintiff is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Institutional investor, Class action, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities fraud and Damages.
He most often published in these fields:
- Accounting (26.01%)
- Law and economics (24.28%)
- Law (23.70%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2020)?
- Law and economics (24.28%)
- Law (23.70%)
- Accounting (26.01%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Stephen J. Choi mainly focuses on Law and economics, Law, Accounting, Enforcement and Plaintiff.
The Law and economics study combines topics in areas such as Pari passu, Boilerplate text and Bond market.
As part of his studies on Law, he frequently links adjacent subjects like Keynesian economics.
His Accounting research includes themes of Abnormal return and Shareholder.
His Enforcement study also includes
- Empirical research which connect with Court Actions,
- Commission, which have a strong connection to Public administration, Legal profession and Private sector.
His Plaintiff research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Corporate law, Institutional investor and Class action, Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, Securities fraud.
Between 2014 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- SEC Investigations and Securities Class Actions: An Empirical Comparison (13 citations)
- Does Majority Voting Improve Board Accountability (8 citations)
- The SEC's Shift to Administrative Proceedings: An Empirical Assessment (5 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Empirical research, Enforcement, Accounting, Law and economics and Class action are his primary areas of study.
His Empirical research study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Stock exchange, Political economy and Law reform.
He performs multidisciplinary study in Enforcement and Empirical comparison in his work.
The various areas that he examines in his Accounting study include Disapproval voting, Voting, Voting trust, Majority rule and Accountability.
His study looks at the relationship between Law and economics and fields such as Pari passu, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
His Class action study combines topics in areas such as Information asymmetry, Actuarial science, Officer and Sanctions.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
