World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
9635
World Ranking
9255
National Ranking
3905

Stephan G. Anagnostaras publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan G. Anagnostaras sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephan G. Anagnostaras D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephan G. Anagnostaras sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2007 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Stephan G. Anagnostaras is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific disciplines including Medicine, Neuroscience, and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. They have contributed notably to subfields such as Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cell Biology, Clinical Psychology, and Pharmacology.

Their research extensively covers topics related to Psychedelics and Drug Studies, Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research, Neural dynamics and brain function, Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications, Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics, Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, and Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways.

Stephan G. Anagnostaras has published research in several scientific venues, with frequent contributions in:

  • Psychopharmacology
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • eNeuro
  • The FASEB Journal
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Recent publications include:

  • Quantifying the Acoustic Startle Response in Mice Using Standard Digital Video, 2020, Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
  • MDMA and memory, addiction, and depression: dose-effect analysis, 2022, Psychopharmacology
  • Altered Phosphorylation of the Proteasome Subunit Rpt6 Has Minimal Impact on Synaptic Plasticity and Learning, 2021, eNeuro
  • Correction to: MDMA and memory, addiction, and depression: dose-effect analysis, 2022, Psychopharmacology
  • MDMA and Pavlovian Fear Memory: Dose-Effect Analysis, 2020, The FASEB Journal

Stephan G. Anagnostaras collaborates frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Madeline M. Pantoni
  • Kaitlin R. Van Alstyne
  • Jinah L. Kim
  • Gerald M. Herrera
  • Samantha L. Scudder

In 2007, Stephan G. Anagnostaras was recognized as a Hellman Fellow.

Best Publications

  • Temporally Graded Retrograde Amnesia of Contextual Fear after Hippocampal Damage in Rats: Within-Subjects Examination

    Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Stephen Maren;Michael S. Fanselow

  • Hippocampus and contextual fear conditioning: recent controversies and advances.

    Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Greg D. Gale;Michael S. Fanselow

  • Selective cognitive dysfunction in acetylcholine M1 muscarinic receptor mutant mice.

    Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Geoffrey G. Murphy;Susan E. Hamilton;Scott L. Mitchell

  • Attenuated sensitivity to neuroactive steroids in γ-aminobutyrate type A receptor delta subunit knockout mice

    Robert M. Mihalek;Pradeep K. Banerjee;Esa R. Korpi;Joseph J. Quinlan

  • Role of the basolateral amygdala in the storage of fear memories across the adult lifetime of rats.

    Greg D. Gale;Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Bill P. Godsil;Shawn Mitchell

  • Mice lacking the beta3 subunit of the GABAA receptor have the epilepsy phenotype and many of the behavioral characteristics of Angelman syndrome.

    T. M. DeLorey;A. Handforth;S. G. Anagnostaras;G. E. Homanics

  • Context fear learning in the absence of the hippocampus.

    Brian J. Wiltgen;Matthew J. Sanders;Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Jennifer R. Sage

  • Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: modulation by associative learning.

    Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Terry E. Robinson

  • Psychostimulants and Cognition: A Continuum of Behavioral and Cognitive Activation

    Suzanne Wood;Jennifer R. Sage;Tristan Shuman;Stephan G. Anagnostaras

  • An opportunistic theory of cellular and systems consolidation.

    Sara C. Mednick;Denise J. Cai;Tristan Shuman;Stephan Anagnostaras

  • Mouse model of Sanfilippo syndrome type B produced by targeted disruption of the gene encoding alpha-N-acetylglucosaminidase.

    Hong Hua Li;Wei-Hong Yu;Nora Rozengurt;Hui-Zhi Zhao

  • Selective enhancement of emotional, but not motor, learning in monoamine oxidase A-deficient mice

    Jeansok J. Kim;Jean C. Shih;Kevin Chen;Lu Chen

  • The development of sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine is enhanced in a novel environment

    Aldo Badiani;S. G. Anagnostaras;Terry E. Robinson

  • Memory Processes Governing Amphetamine-induced Psychomotor Sensitization

    Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Timothy J Schallert;Terry E. Robinson

  • Consolidation of CS and US representations in associative fear conditioning.

    Paul W. Frankland;Sheena A. Josselyn;Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Jeffrey H. Kogan

  • Computer-Assisted Behavioral Assessment of Pavlovian Fear Conditioning in Mice

    Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Sheena A. Josselyn;Paul W. Frankland;Alcino J. Silva

  • Automated assessment of pavlovian conditioned freezing and shock reactivity in mice using the video freeze system.

    Stephan G Anagnostaras;Suzanne C Wood;Tristan Shuman;Denise J Cai

  • Scopolamine and Pavlovian fear conditioning in rats: dose-effect analysis.

    Stephan G Anagnostaras;Stephen Maren;Jennifer R Sage;Stacy Goodrich

  • The startled seahorse: is the hippocampus necessary for contextual fear conditioning?

    Stephen Maren;Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Michael S. Fanselow

  • Scopolamine selectively disrupts the acquisition of contextual fear conditioning in rats.

    Stephan G. Anagnostaras;Stephen Maren;Michael S. Fanselow

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael S. Fanselow
Michael S. Fanselow University of California, Los Angeles
Alcino J. Silva
Alcino J. Silva University of California, Los Angeles
Stephen Maren
Stephen Maren University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Terry E. Robinson
Terry E. Robinson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard W. Olsen
Richard W. Olsen University of California, Los Angeles
Sheena A. Josselyn
Sheena A. Josselyn University of Toronto
Gregg E. Homanics
Gregg E. Homanics University of Pittsburgh
Geoffrey G. Murphy
Geoffrey G. Murphy University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul W. Frankland
Paul W. Frankland University of Toronto
Neil M. Nathanson
Neil M. Nathanson University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are passionate about Neuroscience, there are a variety of online degrees and career pathways that can help you advance in this exciting field. For students interested in deeper psychological practice or clinical roles, pursuing an online psyd program offers the credentials needed for a career as a licensed psychologist.

For those considering marriage and family therapy, an accelerated online mft program can provide a fast track to licensure and a rewarding therapeutic career. Individuals looking to complete their undergraduate studies efficiently might explore options to earn a bachelor degree online in 2 years, allowing them to enter the job market quickly or pursue graduate study.

It’s also important to consider future earning potential. Many students are interested in enrolling in degrees that pay well, to maximize their career opportunities after graduation. Carefully exploring these pathways can help shape a satisfying and lucrative career related to Neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Stephan G. Anagnostaras

Trending Scientists