World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 56 2216 1097 85 9779

Silvia Santamarina-Fojo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Silvia Santamarina-Fojo between 1991 and 2009, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Silvia Santamarina-Fojo published across 19 years, from 1991 to 2009, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 1996. 1 of the 111 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2009. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 1996. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication
1991 2009

111 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Silvia Santamarina-Fojo: publications per year, 1991 to 2009
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 4
1993 7
1994 6
1995 6
1996 15
1997 11
1998 4
1999 8
2000 9
2001 9
2002 6
2003 9
2004 5
2005 1
2006 4
2007 3
2008 0
2009 1
Total 111
Download as CSV

Silvia Santamarina-Fojo publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia Santamarina-Fojo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 85 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90 85
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Silvia Santamarina-Fojo D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvia Santamarina-Fojo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113 56
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Silvia Santamarina-Fojo is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersection of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with specific attention to medicine. The scientist's work spans several subfields including genetics and epidemiology.

The main topics covered in their research include diabetes and associated disorders as well as liver disease diagnosis and treatment.

  • Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment

Silvia Santamarina-Fojo has contributed to publications in recognized venues such as UNC Libraries.

  • UNC Libraries

One recent publication authored in collaboration with Junji Kobayashi is titled "Analysis of Protein Structure-Function in Vivo: ADENOVIRUS-MEDIATED TRANSFER OF LIPASE LID MUTANTS IN HEPATIC LIPASE-DEFICIENT MICE", published in 2021 by UNC Libraries.

  • Analysis of Protein Structure-Function in Vivo: ADENOVIRUS-MEDIATED TRANSFER OF LIPASE LID MUTANTS IN HEPATIC LIPASE-DEFICIENT MICE (2021, UNC Libraries)

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues including:

  • Junji Kobayashi
  • Deborah Applebaum-Bowden
  • Klaus A. Dugi
  • David R. Brown
  • Vikram S. Kashyap

The scope of Silvia Santamarina-Fojo's research illustrates an integration of clinical and molecular approaches to better understand metabolic and liver-related diseases. Their work involving protein structure and function analysis in vivo highlights an emphasis on experimental techniques that contribute to biomedical knowledge in hepatic and metabolic disorders.

Best Publications

  • Cellular localization and trafficking of the human ABCA1 transporter.

    Edward B. Neufeld;Alan T. Remaley;Stephen J. Demosky;John A. Stonik

  • Apolipoprotein Specificity for Lipid Efflux by the Human ABCAI Transporter

    Alan T. Remaley;John A. Stonik;Steven J. Demosky;Edward B. Neufeld

  • Human ATP-binding cassette transporter 1 (ABC1): Genomic organization and identification of the genetic defect in the original Tangier disease kindred

    Alan T. Remaley;Stephan Rust;Marie Rosier;Cathy Knapper

  • The role of hepatic lipase in lipoprotein metabolism and atherosclerosis

    Unknown

  • High plasma HDL concentrations associated with enhanced atherosclerosis in transgenic mice overexpressing lecithin-cholesteryl acyltransferase.

    Annie M. Bérard;Bernhard Föger;Alan Remaley;Robert Shamburek

  • Synthetic amphipathic helical peptides promote lipid efflux from cells by an ABCA1-dependent and an ABCA1-independent pathway.

    Alan T. Remaley;Fairwell Thomas;John A. Stonik;Steve J. Demosky

  • The ABCA1 transporter modulates late endocytic trafficking: insights from the correction of the genetic defect in Tangier disease.

    Edward B. Neufeld;John A. Stonik;Stephen J. Demosky;Catherine L. Knapper

  • Complete genomic sequence of the human ABCA1 gene: Analysis of the human and mouse ATP-binding cassette A promoter

    Silvia Santamarina-Fojo;Katherine Peterson;Catherine Knapper;Yang Qiu

  • Regulation and intracellular trafficking of the ABCA1 transporter.

    Silvia Santamarina-Fojo;Alan T. Remaley;Edward B. Neufeld;H. Bryan Brewer

  • The human ABCG1 gene: identification of LXR response elements that modulate expression in macrophages and liver

    Steven L. Sabol;H. Bryan Brewer;Silvia Santamarina-Fojo

  • Plasma Phospholipid Transfer Protein: ADENOVIRUS-MEDIATED OVEREXPRESSION IN MICE LEADS TO DECREASED PLASMA HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN (HDL) AND ENHANCED HEPATIC UPTAKE OF PHOSPHOLIPIDS AND CHOLESTERYL ESTERS FROM HDL *

    Bernhard Föger;Silvia Santamarina-Fojo;Robert D. Shamburek;Catherine L. Parrot

  • Analysis of Glomerulosclerosis and Atherosclerosis in Lecithin Cholesterol Acyltransferase-deficient Mice

    Gilles Lambert;Naohiko Sakai;Boris L. Vaisman;Edward B. Neufeld

  • Structure, function and role of lipoprotein lipase in lipoprotein metabolism.

    Unknown

  • Hepatic lipase promotes the selective uptake of high density lipoprotein-cholesteryl esters via the scavenger receptor B1.

    Gilles Lambert;Michael B. Chase;Klaus Dugi;Andre Bensadoun

  • Targeted Disruption of the Mouse Lecithin:Cholesterol Acyltransferase (LCAT) Gene: GENERATION OF A NEW ANIMAL MODEL FOR HUMAN LCAT DEFICIENCY

    Sakai N;Vaisman Bl;Koch Ca;Hoyt Rf

  • Effects of FXR in foam-cell formation and atherosclerosis development.

    Grace L. Guo;Silvia Santamarina-Fojo;Taro E. Akiyama;Marcelo J.A. Amar

  • The orphan nuclear receptor LRH-1 activates the ABCG5/ABCG8 intergenic promoter.

    Lita A. Freeman;Arion Kennedy;Justina Wu;Samantha Bark

  • Lecithin-cholesterol acyltransferase: role in lipoprotein metabolism, reverse cholesterol transport and atherosclerosis.

    Silvia Santamarina-Fojo;Gilles Lambert;Jeffrey Hoeg;H. Brewer

  • The ABCA1 transporter functions on the basolateral surface of hepatocytes

    Edward B Neufeld;Steven J Demosky;John A Stonik;Christian Combs

  • ABCA1 overexpression in the liver of LDLr-KO mice leads to accumulation of Pro-atherogenic lipoproteins and enhanced atherosclerosis

    Charles W. Joyce;Elke M. Wagner;Federica Basso;Marcelo J. Amar

Frequent Co-Authors

H. Bryan Brewer
H. Bryan Brewer MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Alan T. Remaley
Alan T. Remaley National Institutes of Health
Beverly Paigen
Beverly Paigen University of Pennsylvania
Santica M. Marcovina
Santica M. Marcovina University of Washington
Nobuyo Maeda
Nobuyo Maeda University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Donald S. Fredrickson
Donald S. Fredrickson National Institutes of Health
André Bensadoun
André Bensadoun Cornell University
Daniel J. Rader
Daniel J. Rader University of Pennsylvania
Giovanna Chimini
Giovanna Chimini Grenoble Alpes University
Michael Dean
Michael Dean National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A foundation in molecular biology opens doors to advanced degrees and diverse career paths across the sciences and healthcare. Many students expand their expertise with interdisciplinary online programs, especially in psychology and counseling, to address complex biological and behavioral challenges in today’s world.

For those interested in the intersection of biology and criminal justice, pursuing highest paying forensic psychology jobs can be a smart move, offering roles in crime labs, law enforcement, or courtroom consulting. If you are drawn to developmental biology and mental health, consider earning child psychology degrees online, which prepare you for careers supporting children and families.

Graduate students often look for affordable, flexible options like the cheapest masters in counseling online, ideal for those balancing work, study, and family commitments. Additionally, earning a clinical psychology degree online can help you transition into roles in healthcare, research, or private practice.

Online learning delivers specialized knowledge, practical skills, and broad career opportunities to molecular biology graduates, helping them stay competitive in evolving scientific and healthcare landscapes.

Best Scientists Citing Silvia Santamarina-Fojo

Recently Published Articles