World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Silvana Di Sabatino

Silvana Di Sabatino

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
43
Citations
9375
World Ranking
6980
National Ranking
141

Silvana Di Sabatino publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvana Di Sabatino sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 290 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Silvana Di Sabatino D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Silvana Di Sabatino sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Air pollution abatement performances of green infrastructure in open road and built-up street canyon environments – A review

    K.V. Abhijith;Prashant Kumar;John Gallagher;John Gallagher;Aonghus McNabola

  • Dispersion study in a street canyon with tree planting by means of wind tunnel and numerical investigations – Evaluation of CFD data with experimental data

    Christof Gromke;Riccardo Buccolieri;Silvana Di Sabatino;Bodo Ruck

  • End-user perspective of low-cost sensors for outdoor air pollution monitoring.

    Aakash C. Rai;Prashant Kumar;Francesco Pilla;Andreas N. Skouloudis

  • The influence of building height variability on pollutant dispersion and pedestrian ventilation in idealized high-rise urban areas

    Jian Hang;Jian Hang;Yuguo Li;Mats Sandberg;Riccardo Buccolieri

  • Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological risk reduction: a state-of-the-art review of the research area

    Laddaporn Ruangpan;Laddaporn Ruangpan;Zoran Vojinovic;Zoran Vojinovic;Silvana Di Sabatino;Laura Sandra Leo

  • Aerodynamic effects of trees on pollutant concentration in street canyons

    Riccardo Buccolieri;Christof Gromke;Silvana Di Sabatino;Bodo Ruck

  • Numerical simulation of atmospheric pollutant dispersion in an urban street canyon: Comparison between RANS and LES

    Salim Mohamed Salim;Riccardo Buccolieri;Andrew Chan;Silvana Di Sabatino

  • City breathability and its link to pollutant concentration distribution within urban-like geometries

    Riccardo Buccolieri;Riccardo Buccolieri;Mats Sandberg;Silvana Di Sabatino

  • Analysis of local scale tree-atmosphere interaction on pollutant concentration in idealized street canyons and application to a real urban junction

    Riccardo Buccolieri;Salim Mohamed Salim;Laura Sandra Leo;Silvana Di Sabatino

  • Simulations of pollutant dispersion within idealised urban-type geometries with CFD and integral models

    Silvana Di Sabatino;Riccardo Buccolieri;Beatrice Pulvirenti;Rex Britter

  • The impacts of building height variations and building packing densities on flow adjustment and city breathability in idealized urban models

    Lan Chen;Jian Hang;Mats Sandberg;Leif Claesson

  • Flow, turbulence, and pollutant dispersion in urban atmospheresa)

    H. J. S. Fernando;D. Zajic;S. Di Sabatino;R. Dimitrova

  • The MATERHORN: Unraveling the Intricacies of Mountain Weather

    H. J. S. Fernando;E. R. Pardyjak;S. Di Sabatino;F. K. Chow

  • Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases.

    Sisay E. Debele;Prashant Kumar;Prashant Kumar;Jeetendra Sahani;Belen Marti-Cardona

  • Towards an operationalisation of nature-based solutions for natural hazards

    Prashant Kumar;Sisay E. Debele;Jeetendra Sahani;Leonardo Aragão

  • Urban texture analysis with image processing techniques: winds and dispersion

    C. Ratti;S. Di Sabatino;R. Britter

  • Flow and Pollutant Dispersion in Street Canyons using FLUENT and ADMS-Urban

    S. Di Sabatino;R. Buccolieri;B. Pulvirenti;R. E. Britter

  • City breathability in medium density urban-like geometries evaluated through the pollutant transport rate and the net escape velocity

    Jian Hang;Qun Wang;Xieyuan Chen;Mats Sandberg

  • Analysis of 3-D Urban Databases with Respect to Pollution Dispersion for a Number of European and American Cities

    C. Ratti;S. Di Sabatino;R. Britter;M. Brown

  • Nature-based solutions can help reduce the impact of natural hazards: A global analysis of NBS case studies

    Unknown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences can lead to diverse career opportunities, often supported by further education in related fields. For those interested in advancing their knowledge without the lengthy commitment of a dissertation, exploring education doctoral programs without dissertation offers flexible pathways to leadership roles in education and environmental management.

Students keen on leadership and specialized expertise might consider transitioning through eds to edd programs. These programs provide a streamlined route to doctoral degrees focused on practical application and policy development, crucial for shaping environmental initiatives.

For professionals aiming to integrate social aspects with environmental advocacy, identifying fully funded dsw programs can be a valuable step. Such programs support students financially while preparing them for impactful roles in community development and sustainability.

Additionally, for those just beginning their higher education journey or seeking a broad interdisciplinary foundation, the best affordable online general studies degree programs offer accessible entry points. These programs can set the stage for specialized environmental studies or related career paths.

Recently Published Articles