World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
11643
World Ranking
7412
National Ranking
4005

Shmuel Lissek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shmuel Lissek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 84 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Shmuel Lissek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shmuel Lissek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shmuel Lissek is a researcher affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research broadly spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a pronounced focus on cognitive neuroscience and experimental and cognitive psychology. Their scientific work also intersects with behavioral neuroscience, clinical psychology, and neurology.

Their main research topics include stress responses and cortisol, memory and neural mechanisms, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, functional brain connectivity studies, mental health research topics, traumatic brain injury research, and posttraumatic stress disorder research.

Frequent publication venues for Shmuel Lissek include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy

Recent significant papers authored or coauthored by Lissek are:

  • The neurobiology of human fear generalization: meta-analysis and working neural model, 2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • A meta-analysis of conditioned fear generalization in anxiety-related disorders, 2022, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Consensus design of a calibration experiment for human fear conditioning, 2023, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Salience and central executive networks track overgeneralization of conditioned-fear in post-traumatic stress disorder, 2020, Psychological Medicine
  • Emotional numbing in PTSD is associated with lower amygdala reactivity to pain, 2022, Neuropsychopharmacology

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Shmuel Lissek include:

  • Hannah Berg
  • Scott R. Sponheim
  • Nicholas D. Davenport
  • Benjamin Suarez-Jimenez
  • Seth G. Disner

Best Publications

  • Classical fear conditioning in the anxiety disorders : a meta-analysis

    Shmuel Lissek;Alice S. Powers;Erin B. McClure;Elizabeth A. Phelps

  • Attention Bias Modification Treatment: A Meta-Analysis Toward the Establishment of Novel Treatment for Anxiety

    Yuko Hakamata;Shmuel Lissek;Yair Bar-Haim;Jennifer C. Britton

  • Updated Meta-Analysis of Classical Fear Conditioning in the Anxiety Disorders

    Puck Duits;Danielle C. Cath;Shmuel Lissek;Joop J. Hox

  • Overgeneralization of Conditioned Fear as a Pathogenic Marker of Panic Disorder

    Shmuel Lissek;Stephanie Rabin;Randi E. Heller;David Lukenbaugh

  • Generalized anxiety disorder is associated with overgeneralization of classically conditioned fear.

    Shmuel Lissek;Shmuel Lissek;Antonia N. Kaczkurkin;Stephanie Rabin;Marilla Geraci

  • Generalization of conditioned fear-potentiated startle in humans: experimental validation and clinical relevance.

    Shmuel Lissek;Arter L. Biggs;Stephanie J. Rabin;Brian R. Cornwell

  • Anxious responses to predictable and unpredictable aversive events

    Christian Grillon;Johanna P. Baas;Shmuel Lissek;Kathryn Smith

  • Toward an account of clinical anxiety predicated on basic, neurally mapped mechanisms of Pavlovian fear-learning: The case for conditioned overgeneralization

    Shmuel Lissek

  • Development of anxiety: the role of threat appraisal and fear learning

    Jennifer C. Britton;Shmuel Lissek;Christian Grillon;A B S Maxine Norcross

  • Increased anxiety during anticipation of unpredictable but not predictable aversive stimuli as a psychophysiologic marker of panic disorder

    Christian Grillon;Shmuel Lissek;Stephanie Rabin;Dana McDowell

  • Increased Anxiety During Anticipation of Unpredictable Aversive Stimuli in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder but not in Generalized Anxiety Disorder

    Christian Grillon;Daniel S. Pine;Shmuel Lissek;Stephanie Rabin

  • Neural substrates of classically conditioned fear-generalization in humans: a parametric fMRI study

    Shmuel Lissek;Daniel E. Bradford;Ruben P. Alvarez;Philip C Burton

  • Impaired discriminative fear-conditioning resulting from elevated fear responding to learned safety cues among individuals with panic disorder.

    Shmuel Lissek;Stephanie J. Rabin;Dana J. McDowell;Sharone Dvir

  • The strong situation: A potential impediment to studying the psychobiology and pharmacology of anxiety disorders

    Shmuel Lissek;Daniel S. Pine;Christian Grillon

  • Learning models of PTSD: Theoretical accounts and psychobiological evidence

    Shmuel Lissek;Brian van Meurs

  • Neural Substrates of Overgeneralized Conditioned Fear in PTSD

    Antonia N. Kaczkurkin;Antonia N. Kaczkurkin;Philip C. Burton;Shai M. Chazin;Shai M. Chazin;Adrienne B. Manbeck;Adrienne B. Manbeck

  • Fear conditioning in adolescents with anxiety disorders: results from a novel experimental paradigm

    Jennifer Y.F. Lau;Shmuel Lissek;Eric E. Nelson;Yoon Lee

  • Distinct neural signatures of threat learning in adolescents and adults

    Jennifer Y. Lau;Jennifer Y. Lau;Jennifer C. Britton;Eric E. Nelson;Adrian Angold

  • Response to learned threat: An FMRI study in adolescent and adult anxiety.

    Jennifer C. Britton;Christian Grillon;Shmuel Lissek;Maxine A. Norcross

  • Elevated Fear Conditioning to Socially Relevant Unconditioned Stimuli in Social Anxiety Disorder

    Shmuel Lissek;B.A. Jessica Levenson;B.A. Arter L. Biggs;B.A. Linda L. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Grillon
Christian Grillon National Institutes of Health
Daniel S. Pine
Daniel S. Pine National Institutes of Health
Jennifer Y. F. Lau
Jennifer Y. F. Lau Queen Mary University of London
Johanna M.P. Baas
Johanna M.P. Baas Utrecht University
Jim van Os
Jim van Os University Medical Center Utrecht
Monique Ernst
Monique Ernst National Institutes of Health
Koen Schruers
Koen Schruers Maastricht University
Jennifer C. Britton
Jennifer C. Britton University of Miami
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health
Eric E. Nelson
Eric E. Nelson The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online psychology degree in the USA opens a diverse range of career pathways. Whether your goal is to work in mental health, research, education, or business, accredited online programs provide the flexibility to fit your education around your life. Understanding regional program quality can be crucial. For example, those looking for the top psychology degrees in Georgia will discover schools with a strong reputation for their faculty and student outcomes.

Exploring local opportunities is equally important. If you’re considering pursuing your education near North Dakota, take a look at the best psychology degree rankings in Grand Forks for insights on leading institutions. Similarly, those interested in Michigan should review the best psychology degree rankings in Grand Rapids.

For students in South Carolina, the best psychology degree rankings in Greenville highlight standout online and campus-based options. Exploring these regional rankings can help you find a program aligned with your career goals and learning preferences, ensuring a strong start in a dynamic field.

Best Scientists Citing Shmuel Lissek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles