World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
12827
World Ranking
5340
National Ranking
353

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
54
Citations
15434
World Ranking
3967
National Ranking
301

Shaun Quegan publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaun Quegan sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 275 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Shaun Quegan D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shaun Quegan sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Shaun Quegan is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their academic and research work is associated with this institution.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or specific publication venues linked to this researcher in the available data. Additionally, information about book publications, main fields of study, subfields, or primary topics of research is not provided.

There are no awards or honors listed for Shaun Quegan, and there is no indication that they are deceased.

This profile reflects the limited publicly available information about Shaun Quegan's academic affiliations and does not include specific details about their research contributions or publication record.

Best Publications

  • Understanding Synthetic Aperture Radar Images

    Chris Oliver;Shaun Quegan

  • Response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms

    T. J. Fuller-Rowell;M. V. Codrescu;R. J. Moffett;S. Quegan

  • The BIOMASS mission: Mapping global forest biomass to better understand the terrestrial carbon cycle

    T. Le Toan;S. Quegan;M.W.J. Davidson;Heiko Balzter

  • On the seasonal response of the thermosphere and ionosphere to geomagnetic storms

    T. J. Fuller-Rowell;M. V. Codrescu;H. Rishbeth;R. J. Moffett

  • Potential for large-scale CO2 removal via enhanced rock weathering with croplands

    David J. Beerling;Euripides P. Kantzas;Mark R. Lomas;Peter Wade

  • Model–data synthesis in terrestrial carbon observation: methods, data requirements and data uncertainty specifications

    M. R. Raupach;P. J. Rayner;D. J. Barrett;R. S. DeFries

  • Multitemporal ERS SAR analysis applied to forest mapping

    S. Quegan;T. Le Toan;J.J. Yu;F. Ribbes

  • Filtering of multichannel SAR images

    S. Quegan;Jiong Jiong Yu

  • The role of ion drift in the formation of ionisation troughs in the mid- and high-latitude ionosphere—a review

    A.S. Rodger;R.J. Moffett;S. Quegan

  • The global forest above-ground biomass pool for 2010 estimated from high-resolution satellite observations

    Maurizio Santoro;Oliver Cartus;Nuno Carvalhais;Nuno Carvalhais;Danaë M. A. Rozendaal

  • Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Classification on Multispectral Data

    Asmala Ahmad;Hang Tuah Jaya;Shaun Quegan

  • The European Space Agency BIOMASS mission: Measuring forest above-ground biomass from space

    Shaun Quegan;Thuy Le Toan;Jerome Chave;Jorgen Dall

  • A unified algorithm for phase and cross-talk calibration of polarimetric data-theory and observations

    S. Quegan

  • Current systematic carbon-cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy-relevant carbon observing system

    P. Ciais;A. J. Dolman;A. Bombelli;R. Duren

  • High-resolution measurements of scattering in wheat canopies-implications for crop parameter retrieval

    S.C.M. Brown;S. Quegan;K. Morrison;J.C. Bennett

  • A STATISTICAL DESCRIPTION OF POLARIMETRIC AND INTERFEROMETRIC SYNTHETIC APERTURE RADAR DATA

    R. J. A. Tough;D. Blacknell;S. Quegan

  • The mid-latitude trough in the electron concentration of the ionospheric F-layer: a review of observations and modelling

    R.J. Moffett;S. Quegan

  • Interactions between neutral thermospheric composition and the polar ionosphere using a coupled ionosphere‐thermosphere model

    T. J. Fuller-Rowell;D. Rees;S. Quegan;R. J. Moffett

  • A theoretical study of the distribution of ionization in the high-latitude ionosphere and the plasmasphere - First results on the mid-latitude trough and the light-ion trough

    S Quegan;G.J Bailey;R.J Moffett;R.A Heelis

  • Faraday rotation effects on L-band spaceborne SAR data

    P.A. Wright;S. Quegan;N.S. Wheadon;C.D. Hall

  • Spotlight Synthetic Aperture Radar: Signal Processing Algorithms.

    S. Quegan

  • [Regional Climates] Central South America 2016

    J. A. Marengo;Jhan Carlo Espinoza;L. M. Alves;J. Ronchail

Frequent Co-Authors

R.J. Moffett
R.J. Moffett University of Sheffield
Thuy Le Toan
Thuy Le Toan Paul Sabatier University
Mark R. Lomas
Mark R. Lomas University of Sheffield
Lars M. H. Ulander
Lars M. H. Ulander Chalmers University of Technology
Tim Fuller-Rowell
Tim Fuller-Rowell University of Colorado Boulder
Klaus Scipal
Klaus Scipal European Space Agency
Stefano Tebaldini
Stefano Tebaldini Polytechnic University of Milan
Heiko Balzter
Heiko Balzter University of Leicester
Nuno Carvalhais
Nuno Carvalhais Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Sassan Saatchi
Sassan Saatchi California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can offer diverse pathways to build specialized skills and bolster career prospects. For instance, those aiming to integrate social policy and environmental advocacy might consider an affordable dsw program, which provides advanced training in social work with flexible learning options.

If you're undecided or seeking a broad foundation, pursuing a cheap online general studies degree might be a practical choice. This pathway enables students to sample multiple disciplines while managing education costs effectively.

For those prioritizing ease and swiftness in completing their undergraduate studies, exploring the easiest bachelors degree programs can be a strategic option, though it's important to balance ease with the depth of knowledge required for Environmental Science careers.

Finally, specializing further with a focused degree such as an online geology online degree can open doors to careers in earth sciences, ecological assessment, and natural resource management. Selecting the right degree path depends on individual goals, career aspirations, and the commitment to continuous learning in this evolving field.

Best Scientists Citing Shaun Quegan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles