World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 73 2029 1931 928 871 228 22780

Shalini N. Jhangiani publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Shalini N. Jhangiani between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Shalini N. Jhangiani published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2016. 17 of the 253 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2016. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 29 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 7 publications
2007 2025

253 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Shalini N. Jhangiani: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 2
2009 0
2010 0
2011 2
2012 2
2013 4
2014 19
2015 28
2016 33
2017 29
2018 23
2019 23
2020 21
2021 26
2022 12
2023 11
2024 10
2025 7
Total 253
Download as CSV

Shalini N. Jhangiani publications per year - data summary

  • Shalini N. Jhangiani, a Genetics scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, has 253 publications recorded across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 2007 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2016, with 33 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2007, with 1 publication.
  • 2 of the 19 years in the span carry no publications at all (2009 and 2010).
  • The rate of publication averages 13.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 14.9 per year counting only the 17 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 66 publications, 26% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 2007-2013: 11 publications (1.6 per year); 2014-2020: 176 publications (25.1 per year); 2021-2025: 66 publications (13.2 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Shalini N. Jhangiani publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shalini N. Jhangiani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 225–234 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 228 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143 228
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Shalini N. Jhangiani publication distribution in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 67 ranges running from 45–54 to 703+ publications.
  • Shalini N. Jhangiani, a Genetics scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, records 228 publications - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Shalini N. Jhangiani, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 195–204 publications range, and Shalini N. Jhangiani ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 125–134 publications, holding 217 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 56% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 205–214 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 703 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Shalini N. Jhangiani D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Shalini N. Jhangiani sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150 73
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Shalini N. Jhangiani D-index placement in Genetics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 4,342 Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 40–41 to 160+ D-Index.
  • Shalini N. Jhangiani, a Genetics scholar from Baylor College of Medicine, records 73 D-Index - the 54th percentile of the discipline.
  • 54% of ranked Genetics scientists score the same or lower than Shalini N. Jhangiani, and about 46% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 70–71 D-Index range, and Shalini N. Jhangiani ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62–63 D-Index, holding 191 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 51% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 70–71 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (2% of the field).

Overview

Shalini N. Jhangiani is affiliated with Baylor College of Medicine in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with additional focus on Medicine. Within these areas, their work covers key subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Immunology, Cancer Research, and Cell Biology.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Immunodeficiency and Autoimmune Disorders

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Shalini N. Jhangiani include the following:

  • HEM1 deficiency disrupts mTORC2 and F-actin control in inherited immunodysregulatory disease, 2020, Science
  • High prevalence of multilocus pathogenic variation in neurodevelopmental disorders in the Turkish population, 2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Perturbations of genes essential for Müllerian duct and Wölffian duct development in Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome, 2021, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Centers for Mendelian Genomics: A decade of facilitating gene discovery, 2022, Genetics in Medicine
  • Human NK cell deficiency as a result of biallelic mutations in MCM10, 2020, Journal of Clinical Investigation

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Jhangiani include:

  • James R. Lupski
  • Jennifer E. Posey
  • Richard A. Gibbs
  • Zeynep Coban-Akdemir
  • Haowei Du

Notable publication venues for Shalini N. Jhangiani encompass:

  • American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Human Mutation

Best Publications

  • Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways

    Roger McLendon;Allan Friedman;Darrell Bigner;Erwin G. Van Meir

  • Somatic mutations affect key pathways in lung adenocarcinoma

    Li Ding;Gad Getz;David A. Wheeler;Elaine R. Mardis

  • The Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel

    Trudy F. C. Mackay;Stephen J. Richards;Eric A. Stone;Antonio Barbadilla

  • The genome of the model beetle and pest Tribolium castaneum.

    Stephen Richards;Richard A. Gibbs;George M. Weinstock;Susan J. Brown

  • Evolutionary and biomedical insights from the rhesus macaque genome

    Richard A. Gibbs;Jeffrey Rogers

  • The Genome Sequence of Taurine Cattle: A Window to Ruminant Biology and Evolution

    Christine G. Elsik;Christine G. Elsik;Christine G. Elsik;Ross L. Tellam;Kim C. Worley;Kim C. Worley;Richard A. Gibbs

  • The Genetic Basis of Mendelian Phenotypes: Discoveries, Challenges, and Opportunities

    Jessica X. Chong;Kati J. Buckingham;Shalini N. Jhangiani;Corinne Boehm

  • The sheep genome illuminates biology of the rumen and lipid metabolism

    Yu Jiang;Yu Jiang;Yu Jiang;Min Xie;Wenbin Chen;Richard Talbot

  • Epistasis dominates the genetic architecture of Drosophila quantitative traits.

    Wen Huang;Stephen Richards;Mary Anna Carbone;Dianhui Zhu

  • A Drosophila Genetic Resource of Mutants to Study Mechanisms Underlying Human Genetic Diseases

    Shinya Yamamoto;Manish Jaiswal;Wu Lin Charng;Tomasz Gambin

  • COPA mutations impair ER-Golgi transport and cause hereditary autoimmune-mediated lung disease and arthritis

    Levi B. Watkin;Birthe Jessen;Wojciech Wiszniewski;Timothy J. Vece

  • Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species

    S. L. Pearce;D. F. Clarke;D. F. Clarke;P. D. East;S. Elfekih

  • The common marmoset genome provides insight into primate biology and evolution

    Kim C. Worley;Wesley C. Warren;Jeffrey Rogers;Devin Locke

  • The first myriapod genome sequence reveals conservative arthropod gene content and genome organisation in the centipede Strigamia maritima

    Ariel D Chipman;David E. K. Ferrier;Carlo Brena;Jiaxin Qu

  • Genes that Affect Brain Structure and Function Identified by Rare Variant Analyses of Mendelian Neurologic Disease

    Ender Karaca;Tamar Harel;Davut Pehlivan;Shalini N. Jhangiani

  • Association of MTOR Mutations With Developmental Brain Disorders, Including Megalencephaly, Focal Cortical Dysplasia, and Pigmentary Mosaicism.

    Ghayda M. Mirzaa;Ghayda M. Mirzaa;Catarina D. Campbell;Nadia Solovieff;Carleton P. Goold

  • Primary immunodeficiency diseases: Genomic approaches delineate heterogeneous Mendelian disorders.

    Asbjørg Stray-Pedersen;Hanne Sørmo Sorte;Pubudu Samarakoon;Tomasz Gambin;Tomasz Gambin

  • Exome Sequence Analysis Suggests that Genetic Burden Contributes to Phenotypic Variability and Complex Neuropathy

    Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui;Claudia Gonzaga-Jauregui;Tamar Harel;Tomasz Gambin;Maria Kousi

  • Hemichordate genomes and deuterostome origins

    Oleg Simakov;Takeshi Kawashima;Ferdinand Marlétaz;Jerry Jenkins

  • Whole-exome sequencing points to considerable genetic heterogeneity of cerebral palsy

    G McMichael;M N Bainbridge;E Haan;E Haan;M Corbett

Frequent Co-Authors

James R. Lupski
James R. Lupski Baylor College of Medicine
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine
Donna M. Muzny
Donna M. Muzny Baylor College of Medicine
Eric Boerwinkle
Eric Boerwinkle The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Tomasz Gambin
Tomasz Gambin Warsaw University of Technology
Jennifer E. Posey
Jennifer E. Posey Baylor College of Medicine
Jordan S. Orange
Jordan S. Orange University of Pennsylvania
V. Reid Sutton
V. Reid Sutton Baylor College of Medicine
Zeynep Coban-Akdemir
Zeynep Coban-Akdemir The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Jill A. Rosenfeld
Jill A. Rosenfeld Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

With the growing demand for genetics professionals, students often consider alternative online education pathways. Many choose programs like medical coding and billing certification to quickly establish a foundation in healthcare and gain practical industry skills. This can be an efficient entry point into the medical and genetic data fields.

For those eager to progress more rapidly, a fast track bachelor's degree online offers an accelerated route, enabling learners to graduate sooner and enter the workforce or pursue advanced studies in genetics.

Flexibility is also crucial, and self paced degrees allow students to tailor their studies around existing commitments—ideal for working professionals or parents.

Additionally, applicants seeking minimal barriers can benefit from online colleges with open enrollment and no application fee, making it easier to begin their academic journey in genetics or related fields. These diverse online options ensure students can find the right fit for their career aspirations and personal circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Shalini N. Jhangiani

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles