World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 55 3878 3561 1509 1348 186 9000

Scott Dee publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott Dee between 1984 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott Dee published across 42 years, from 1984 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2004. 12 of the 235 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2004. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 7 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 23 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 4 publications
1984 2025

235 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott Dee: publications per year, 1984 to 2025
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 2
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 7
1997 7
1998 5
1999 3
2000 4
2001 6
2002 13
2003 8
2004 23
2005 16
2006 14
2007 11
2008 3
2009 9
2010 8
2011 7
2012 6
2013 4
2014 4
2015 2
2016 2
2017 0
2018 6
2019 4
2020 13
2021 15
2022 12
2023 4
2024 8
2025 4
Total 235
Download as CSV

Scott Dee publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Dee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 185–194 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 186 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190 186
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Scott Dee D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Dee sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134 55
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott Dee is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in agricultural and biological sciences as well as medicine. Their work primarily focuses on animal science, infectious diseases, and agronomy, with particular attention to the study and management of animal virus infections and related epidemiology.

The research topics addressed by Scott Dee include:

  • Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Viral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
  • Vector-Borne Animal Diseases
  • Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Scott Dee's publication record includes several papers, with recent notable works being:

  • Mitigating the risk of African swine fever virus in feed with anti-viral chemical additives (2020), published in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
  • Quantifying Individual Response to PRRSV Using Dynamic Indicators of Resilience Based on Activity (2020), published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science
  • Stability of classical swine fever virus and pseudorabies virus in animal feed ingredients exposed to transpacific shipping conditions (2020), published in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
  • An evaluation of additives for mitigating the risk of virus-contaminated feed using an ice-block challenge model (2020), published in Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
  • The impacts of viral infection and subsequent antimicrobials on the microbiome-resistome of growing pigs (2022), published in Microbiome

The scientist frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Gordon Spronk
  • Megan C. Niederwerder
  • Joel Nerem
  • Eric Nelson
  • Roy Edler

Scott Dee's work appears regularly in various academic venues, with the highest number of publications in:

  • Transboundary and Emerging Diseases (15 publications)
  • Animals (4 publications)
  • Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (4 publications)
  • AASV Annual Meeting (4 publications)
  • Frontiers in Veterinary Science (3 publications)

Their research integrates subfields such as animal science and zoology, infectious diseases, and agronomy and crop science, indicating a multidisciplinary approach to studying animal health, viral pathogens, and feed safety concerns. This is reflected in the scientific themes of virus stability in feed, risk mitigation for swine viruses, and the broader implications of viral infections on animal microbiomes.

Best Publications

  • Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viruses (porcine arteriviruses)

    Jeffrey J. Zimmerman;Scott A. Dee;Derald J. Holtkamp;Michael P. Murtaugh

  • Long-distance airborne transport of infectious PRRSV and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae from a swine population infected with multiple viral variants.

    Satoshi Otake;Scott Dee;Cesar Corzo;Simone Oliveira

  • Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus

    Jenny G. Cho;Scott A. Dee

  • Control and elimination of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

    Cesar A. Corzo;Enrique Mondaca;Spencer Wayne;Montserrat Torremorell

  • The Level of Virus-Specific T-Cell and Macrophage Recruitment in Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Infection in Pigs Is Independent of Virus Load

    Zhengguo Xiao;Laura Batista;Scott Dee;Patrick Halbur

  • Evidence of long distance airborne transport of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae

    Scott Dee;Satoshi Otake;Simone Oliveira;John Deen

  • First report of post-weaning multisystemic wasting syndrome in pigs in Spain

    J. Segalés;M. Sitjar;M. Domingo;S. Dee

  • Transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by fomites (boots and coveralls)

    Satoshi Otake;Scott A. Dee;Kurt D. Rossow;John Deen

  • Survival of viral pathogens in animal feed ingredients under transboundary shipping models.

    Scott A. Dee;Fernando V. Bauermann;Megan C. Niederwerder;Aaron Singrey

  • An Evaluation of Contaminated Complete Feed as a Vehicle for Porcine Epidemic Diarrhea Virus Infection of Naïve Pigs Following Consumption Via Natural Feeding Behavior: Proof of Concept

    Scott Dee;Travis Clement;Adam Schelkopf;Joel Nerem

  • Impact of a modified-live porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus vaccine intervention on a population of pigs infected with a heterologous isolate.

    Jean Paul Cano;Scott A. Dee;Michael P. Murtaugh;Carlos Pijoan

  • Mechanical transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus throughout a coordinated sequence of events during cold weather

    Scott Dee;John Deen;Kurt Rossow;Carrie Weise

  • An experimental model to evaluate the role of transport vehicles as a source of transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus to susceptible pigs.

    Scott A. Dee;John Deen;Satoshi Otake;Carlos Pijoan

  • Transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by needles.

    S. Otake;S. A. Dee;K. D. Rossow;H. S. Joo

  • Mechanical transmission of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus by mosquitoes, Aedes vexans (Meigen).

    Satoshi Otake;Scott A. Dee;Kurt D. Rossow;Roger D. Moon

  • An assessment of the duration of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae infection in an experimentally infected population of pigs.

    Maria Pieters;Carlos Pijoan;Eduardo Fano;Scott Dee

  • Use of a production region model to assess the airborne spread of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.

    Andrea Pitkin;John Deen;Scott Dee

  • Airborne Detection and Quantification of Swine Influenza A Virus in Air Samples Collected Inside, Outside and Downwind from Swine Barns

    Cesar A. Corzo;Marie R Culhane;Scott Dee;Robert B Morrison

  • Isolation of a cytopathic virus from weak pigs on farms with a history of swine infertility and respiratory syndrome.

    In J. Yoon;Han S. Joo;William T. Christianson;Hyun S. Kim

  • Detection of the Emerging Picornavirus Senecavirus A in Pigs, Mice, and Houseflies

    Lok R. Joshi;Kristin A. Mohr;Travis Clement;Kyle S. Hain

  • Effect of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae colonization at weaning on disease severity in growing pigs.

    Eduardo Fano;Carlos Pijoan;Scott Dee;John Deen

  • Virological and immunological responses to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in a large population of gilts

    Laura Batista;Carlos Pijoan;Scott Dee;Michael R Olin

  • Antigen-Specific B-Cell Responses to Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Infection

    Prasad Mulupuri;Jeffrey J. Zimmerman;Joseph Hermann;Craig R. Johnson

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos Pijoan
Carlos Pijoan University of Minnesota
John Deen
John Deen University of Minnesota
Thomas W. Molitor
Thomas W. Molitor University of Minnesota
Michael P. Murtaugh
Michael P. Murtaugh University of Minnesota
Eric A. Nelson
Eric A. Nelson South Dakota State University
James E. Collins
James E. Collins University of Minnesota
Peter R. Davies
Peter R. Davies University of Minnesota
Jane Christopher-Hennings
Jane Christopher-Hennings South Dakota State University
Jeffrey J. Zimmerman
Jeffrey J. Zimmerman Iowa State University
Zhengguo Xiao
Zhengguo Xiao University of Science and Technology of China

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Microbiology opens doors to diverse career options, many of which can be enhanced or complemented through related online programs. For those interested in healthcare, becoming a functional medicine nurse practitioner offers a specialized path that integrates microbiology knowledge with patient care and holistic treatments.

If you are drawn to healthcare administration rather than direct clinical roles, exploring a cahiim accredited him degree online can be a great step. This program equips students to efficiently manage health data, a skill increasingly valuable in the digital age.

Another related profession is becoming a certified professional coder, which involves accurate medical coding essential for healthcare billing and records. Combining microbiology knowledge with coding expertise can broaden employment flexibility.

For those aiming at leadership roles, a health information management bachelor degree salary reflects the lucrative potential in managing healthcare information systems and compliance, a field tangentially related to microbiology through health data analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Dee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles