World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
35
Citations
5956
World Ranking
11606
National Ranking
155

Schubert Foo publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Schubert Foo sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 241 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Schubert Foo D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Schubert Foo sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Schubert Foo is affiliated with Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and specializes in research within the social sciences. Their work predominantly addresses topics related to library science, information literacy, educational methods, health, and psychological well-being.

Their scholarly output includes publications in areas such as library and information sciences, education, information systems, health, and social psychology. The main topics covered in their research are:

  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Educational Methods and Media Use
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources

Foo's recent publications include:

  • "Appraising information literacy skills of students in Singapore," 2020, published in Aslib Journal of Information Management
  • "Play Mode Effect of Exergames on Subthreshold Depression Older Adults: A Randomized Pilot Trial," 2020, published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Developing 21st Century School Media Resource Libraries for Singapore," 2021, published in IASL Annual Conference Proceedings
  • "From Dependence to Independence," 2021, published in IASL Annual Conference Proceedings

Frequent co-authors with whom Foo has collaborated include:

  • Shaheen Majid
  • Yun Ke Chang
  • Jinhui Li
  • Yin-Leng Theng
  • Abdus Sattar Chaudhry

The publication venues where Foo's work commonly appears reflect the focus on library and information science as well as interdisciplinary fields involving education and health, including:

  • IASL Annual Conference Proceedings
  • Aslib Journal of Information Management
  • Frontiers in Psychology

This profile reflects a concentrated engagement in empirical studies on information literacy, library resource development, as well as intersections of health and educational media use. The diverse range of co-authors also indicates collaborative efforts across related fields of study.

Best Publications

  • Bibliometric cartography of information retrieval research by using co-word analysis

    Ying Ding;Gobinda G. Chowdhury;Schubert Foo

  • Ontology Research and Development. Part 1-A Review of Ontology Generation.

    Ying Ding;Schubert Foo

  • Game-based digital interventions for depression therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jinhui Li;Yin Leng Theng;Schubert Foo

  • Ontology research and development. Part 2 - a review of ontology mapping and evolving

    Ying Ding;Schubert Foo

  • Chinese word segmentation and its effect on information retrieval

    Schubert Foo;Hui Li

  • Effect of Exergames on Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Jinhui Li;Yin-Leng Theng;Schubert Foo

  • The Use of Videogames, Gamification, and Virtual Environments in the Self-Management of Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Evidence

    Yin-Leng Theng;Jason W Y Lee;Paul V Patinadan;Schubert S B Foo

  • A study of graduate student end‐users’ use and perception of electronic journals

    Chern Li Liew;Schubert Foo;K.R. Chennupati

  • Mapping the intellectual structure of information retrieval studies : an author co-citation analysis, 1987-1997

    Ying Ding;Gobinda G. Chowdhury;Schubert Foo

  • Environmental scanning: An application of information literacy skills at the workplace

    Xue Zhang;Shaheen Majid;Schubert Foo

  • Predictors of online health information seeking behavior: Changes between 2002 and 2012.

    Jinhui Li;Yin-Leng Theng;Schubert Foo

  • A 21st century approach to tackling dengue: Crowdsourced surveillance, predictive mapping and tailored communication.

    May O. Lwin;Santosh Vijaykumar;Owen Noel Newton Fernando;Siew Ann Cheong

  • Teaching information literacy through learning styles: The application of Gardner's multiple intelligences

    Intan Azura Mokhtar;Shaheen Majid;Schubert Foo

  • Assessing students’ information literacy skills in two secondary schools in Singapore

    Yun-ke Chang;Xue Zhang;Intan Azura Mokhtar;Schubert Foo

  • An analysis of the delayed response to Hurricane Katrina through the lens of knowledge management

    Alton Yeow-Kuan Chua;Selcan Kaynak;Schubert Shou-Boon Foo

  • Journal as Markers of Intellectual Space: Journal Co-Citation Analysis of Information Retrieval Area, 1987–1997

    Ying Ding;Gobinda G. Chowdhury;Schubert Foo

  • A bibliometric analysis of collaboration in the field of Information Retrieval

    Ying Ding;Schubert Foo;Gobinda Chowdhury

  • Information literacy skills of secondary school students in Singapore

    Schubert Foo;Shaheen Majid;Intan Azura Mokhtar;Xue Zhang

  • Bibliometric information retrieval system (BIRS): a web search interface utilizing bibliometric research results

    Ying Ding;Gobinda G. Chowdhury;Schubert Foo;Weizhong Qian

  • Assessing the influence of health literacy on health information behaviors: A multi-domain skills-based approach.

    Venkata Ratnadeep Suri;Shaheen Majid;Yun-Ke Chang;Schubert Foo

  • Perspectives on social tagging

    Ying Ding;Elin K. Jacob;Zhixiong Zhang;Schubert Foo

Frequent Co-Authors

Yin-Leng Theng
Yin-Leng Theng Nanyang Technological University
Dion Hoe-Lian Goh
Dion Hoe-Lian Goh Nanyang Technological University
Xingwang Zhang
Xingwang Zhang Chinese Academy of Sciences
May O. Lwin
May O. Lwin Nanyang Technological University
Ying Ding
Ying Ding The University of Texas at Austin
Siu Cheung Hui
Siu Cheung Hui Nanyang Technological University
Jinhui Li
Jinhui Li Tsinghua University
Ee-Peng Lim
Ee-Peng Lim Singapore Management University
Alton Y. K. Chua
Alton Y. K. Chua Nanyang Technological University
Erjia Yan
Erjia Yan Drexel University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a Computer Science degree, exploring related online programs can open up additional career pathways. Many fields such as engineering, data science, and physics share strong overlaps with computer science, often using similar skills in programming, problem-solving, and analytics.

For those interested in environmental technology, a cheapest online environmental science degree offers a budget-friendly route to careers that merge technology with sustainability. Similarly, engineering remains a popular path—with the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree, you can transition into fields like robotics, manufacturing, and automation.

Another option is pursuing a bachelor of science in physics online, which builds a solid foundation in analytical thinking that is highly applicable to computer science and tech-based roles. For those seeking rapid growth in the tech sector, an affordable data science degree is increasingly valued for its focus on big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.

By comparing these online options, you can find an affordable degree that aligns with your technical interests and supports future career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Schubert Foo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles