World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Animal Science and Veterinary 39 1346 1244 33 32 110 4132

Ruth M. Hamill publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ruth M. Hamill between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ruth M. Hamill published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2017. 12 of the 138 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2017. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1980 2026

138 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ruth M. Hamill: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 4
2007 4
2008 0
2009 5
2010 5
2011 2
2012 6
2013 4
2014 4
2015 6
2016 8
2017 19
2018 15
2019 8
2020 4
2021 10
2022 5
2023 9
2024 6
2025 11
2026 1
Total 138
Download as CSV

Ruth M. Hamill publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth M. Hamill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 84 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 29–33 to 442+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 109. Most scientists, 109, have 119–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 109–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 29–33 publications: 1 scientist 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29–33 publications 442+

This scientist: 110 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
29–33 1
34–38 6
39–43 17
44–48 23
49–53 28
54–58 44
59–63 66
64–68 75
69–73 71
74–78 85
79–83 108
84–88 105
89–93 84
94–98 103
99–103 97
104–108 95
109–113 89 110
114–118 88
119–123 109
124–128 93
129–133 89
134–138 95
139–143 92
144–148 80
149–153 75
154–158 74
159–163 67
164–168 53
169–173 62
174–178 63
179–183 50
184–188 55
189–193 50
194–198 27
199–203 44
204–208 31
209–213 28
214–218 38
219–223 33
224–228 36
229–233 29
234–238 35
239–243 23
244–248 24
249–253 29
254–258 28
259–263 21
264–268 25
269–273 11
274–278 18
279–283 13
284–288 18
289–293 10
294–298 12
299–303 11
304–308 15
309–313 14
314–318 14
319–323 8
324–328 8
329–333 13
334–338 14
339–343 13
344–348 10
349–353 11
354–358 5
359–363 8
364–368 8
369–373 6
374–378 7
379–383 8
384–388 3
389–393 4
394–398 5
399–403 8
404–408 5
409–413 4
414–418 3
419–423 8
424–428 5
429–433 3
434–438 5
439–441 5
442+ 99
Download as CSV

Ruth M. Hamill D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ruth M. Hamill sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 77+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 158. Most scientists, 158, have 31 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,155 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 5
21 22
22 31
23 44
24 53
25 66
26 80
27 101
28 106
29 116
30 154
31 158
32 143
33 137
34 126
35 134
36 112
37 115
38 105
39 111 39
40 107
41 87
42 74
43 62
44 61
45 41
46 51
47 43
48 28
49 47
50 40
51 34
52 33
53 43
54 16
55 32
56 21
57 18
58 28
59 33
60 17
61 21
62 18
63 21
64 9
65 20
66 11
67 16
68 12
69 17
70 13
71 15
72 11
73 11
74 14
75 5
76 6
77+ 100
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • The impact of salt and fat level variation on the physiochemical properties and sensory quality of pork breakfast sausages

    Brian D. Tobin;Maurice G. O'Sullivan;Ruth M. Hamill;Joseph P. Kerry

  • Modelling the influence of inulin as a fat substitute in comminuted meat products on their physico-chemical characteristics and eating quality using a mixture design approach

    Derek F. Keenan;Virginia C. Resconi;Joseph P. Kerry;Ruth M. Hamill

  • The effect of thermal treatments including sous-vide, blast freezing and their combinations on beef tenderness of M. semitendinosus steaks targeted at elderly consumers

    Cristina Botinestean;Derek F. Keenan;Joe P. Kerry;Ruth M. Hamill

  • Association analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms in DGAT1, TG and FABP4 genes and intramuscular fat in crossbred Bos taurus cattle

    L. Pannier;A.M. Mullen;R.M. Hamill;P.C. Stapleton

  • Association of polymorphisms in candidate genes with colour, water-holding capacity, and composition traits in bovine M. longissimus and M. semimembranosus.

    W. Reardon;A.M. Mullen;T. Sweeney;R.M. Hamill

  • Effect of varying salt and fat levels on the sensory and physiochemical quality of frankfurters.

    Brian D. Tobin;Maurice G. O'Sullivan;Ruth M. Hamill;Joseph P. Kerry

  • Understanding meat quality through the application of genomic and proteomic approaches

    Unknown

  • Functional analysis of muscle gene expression profiles associated with tenderness and intramuscular fat content in pork.

    Ruth M. Hamill;Jean McBryan;Chris McGee;Anne Maria Mullen

  • Centrifugal drip is an accessible source for protein indicators of pork ageing and water-holding capacity

    Unknown

  • Effect of varying salt and fat levels on the sensory quality of beef patties

    Brian D. Tobin;Maurice G. O'Sullivan;Ruth M. Hamill;Joseph P. Kerry

  • Understanding the Determination of Meat Quality Using Biochemical Characteristics of the Muscle: Stress at Slaughter and Other Missing Keys.

    E. M. Claudia Terlouw;Brigitte Picard;Véronique Deiss;Cécile Berri

  • Salt content and minimum acceptable levels in whole-muscle cured meat products.

    Gonzalo Delgado-Pando;Estelle Fischer;Paul Allen;Joe P. Kerry

  • Effect of salt reduction and inclusion of 1% edible seaweeds on the chemical, sensory and volatile component profile of reformulated frankfurters

    Elena Garicano Vilar;Hao Ouyang;Maurice G. O'Sullivan;Joseph P. Kerry

  • Addressing Clean Label Trends in Commercial Meat Processing: Strategies, Challenges and Insights from Consumer Perspectives

    Unknown

  • Spatial patterns of genetic diversity across European subspecies of the mountain hare, Lepus timidus L.

    Unknown

  • 2D DIGE proteomic analysis of early post mortem muscle exudate highlights the importance of the stress response for improved water-holding capacity of fresh pork meat

    Unknown

  • RNA-Seq of Liver From Pigs Divergent in Feed Efficiency Highlights Shifts in Macronutrient Metabolism, Hepatic Growth and Immune Response.

    Justyna Horodyska;Ruth M Hamill;Henry Reyer;Nares Trakooljul

  • Development of novel fortified beef patties with added functional protein ingredients for the elderly

    Sephora Baugreet;Joseph P. Kerry;C. Botineştean;Paul Allen

  • Integrity of nuclear genomic deoxyribonucleic acid in cooked meat: Implications for food traceability.

    Ö. Aslan;R. M. Hamill;T. Sweeney;W. Reardon

  • Sex and differentiation: population genetic divergence and sexual dimorphism in Mexican goodeid fish

    M. G. Ritchie;R. M. Hamill;J. A. Graves;A. E. Magurran

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students pursuing Animal Science and Veterinary studies often consider complementary fields to broaden their career opportunities. For those interested in mental health and well-being aspects linked to animal care or agricultural communities, advanced degrees in counseling provide valuable skills. Online programs have grown in accessibility, allowing students to combine their passion for animal science with impactful human services careers.

For example, students can explore the apa accredited psyd programs, which offer doctoral-level training in psychology without requiring GRE scores. These programs prepare graduates for licensure and specialist roles in mental health care.

Those specifically interested in helping individuals with addiction may find value in an addiction counseling degree online. This pathway focuses on intervention strategies relevant to substance use disorders, a critical issue in many communities associated with animal agriculture.

Additionally, the marriage and family masters programs provide training for those seeking to support families and relationships, which can be closely tied to rural and farming environments.

Finally, students aiming for academic or advanced clinical careers may explore affordable options through the counseling phd programs, which offer rigorous doctoral education with financial considerations in mind.

By integrating animal science with these complementary counseling and psychological studies, graduates can enhance their impact across diverse professional settings.

Recently Published Articles