World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
91
Citations
29446
World Ranking
11787
National Ranking
6045

Ronnie Fass publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronnie Fass sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 578 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ronnie Fass D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronnie Fass sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 91 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronnie Fass is affiliated with Case Western Reserve University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of medicine, with notable subfields including surgery, gastroenterology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, physiology, and speech and hearing.

Their work covers several main topics, such as gastroesophageal reflux and treatments, eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology, Helicobacter pylori-related gastroenterology studies, esophageal cancer research and treatment, gastrointestinal motility and disorders, and dysphagia assessment and management.

Ronnie Fass has published extensively, with frequent appearances in the following academic journals:

  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology (51 publications)
  • Gastroenterology (43 publications)
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (18 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology (11 publications)
  • Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (6 publications)

Their most cited recent papers include:

  • Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, 2021, Nature Reviews Disease Primers
  • Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©, 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • ESNM/ANMS consensus paper: Diagnosis and management of refractory gastro-esophageal reflux disease, 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0, 2023, Gut
  • The effect of sleep on gastrointestinal functioning in common digestive diseases, 2020, The Lancet. Gastroenterology & Hepatology

Frequent co-authors involved in numerous collaborations with Ronnie Fass include Fahmi Shibli, Gengqing Song, C. Prakash Gyawali, Sherif Saleh, and Sara Ghoneim.

Best Publications

  • Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis.

    Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao;Arun J. Sanyal;Norman D. Grace;William D. Carey

  • Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©

    Rena Yadlapati;Peter J. Kahrilas;Mark R. Fox;Albert J. Bredenoord

  • Effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors in nonerosive reflux disease

    Bonnie B. Dean;Anacleto D. Gano;Kevin Knight;Joshua J. Ofman

  • Non‐erosive reflux disease (NERD) — acid reflux and symptom patterns

    S. D. Martinez;I. B. Malagon;H. S. Garewal;H. Cui

  • Functional Esophageal Disorders

    Aziz Q;Fass R;Gyawali Cp;Miwa H

  • The clinical and economic value of a short course of omeprazole in patients with noncardiac chest pain

    Ronnie Fass;M.Brian Fennerty;Joshua J. Ofman;Ian M. Gralnek

  • Systematic review: proton-pump inhibitor failure in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease--where next?

    R. Fass;M. Shapiro;R. Dekel;J. Sewell

  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease--should we adopt a new conceptual framework?

    Ronnie Fass;Joshua J Ofman

  • Clinical trial: Lubiprostone in patients with constipation-associated irritable bowel syndrome - Results of two randomized, placebo-controlled studies

    D. A. Drossman;William D. Chey;J. F. Johanson;R. Fass

  • ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux testing

    Ikuo Hirano;Joel E. Richter;Ronnie Fass;Darren S. Baroni

  • Management of heartburn not responding to proton pump inhibitors

    R Fass;D Sifrim

  • Nonerosive reflux disease— current concepts and dilemmas

    Ronnie Fass;M. Brian Fennerty;Nimish Vakil

  • Differential effect of long-term esophageal acid exposure on mechanosensitivity and chemosensitivity in humans

    Ronnie Fass;Bruce Naliboff;Lisa Higa;Cindy Johnson

  • Erosive esophagitis and nonerosive reflux disease (NERD): comparison of epidemiologic, physiologic, and therapeutic characteristics.

    Ronnie Fass

  • Canadian Consensus Conference on the Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Adults – Update 2004

    David Armstrong;John K. Marshall;Naoki Chiba;Robert Enns

  • Functional heartburn: the stimulus, the pain, and the brain

    R Fass;G Tougas

  • Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

    C. Prakash Gyawali;Ronnie Fass

  • Effect of amitryptiline on symptoms, sleep, and visceral perception in patients with functional dyspepsia

    H Mertz;H Mertz;R Fass;R Fass;A Kodner;A Kodner;F Yan-Go;F Yan-Go

  • Asia-Pacific consensus on the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: Update

    Kwong Ming Fock;Nicholas J. Talley;Ronnie Fass;Khean Lee Goh

  • Management of heartburn not responding to proton pump

    D Sifrim;R Fass

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Sampliner
Richard E. Sampliner University of Arizona
Emeran A. Mayer
Emeran A. Mayer University of California, Los Angeles
Benjamin C.Y. Wong
Benjamin C.Y. Wong University of Hong Kong
Ian M. Gralnek
Ian M. Gralnek Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Henry P. Parkman
Henry P. Parkman Temple University
Bruce D. Naliboff
Bruce D. Naliboff University of California, Los Angeles
William D. Chey
William D. Chey University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harris Bernstein
Harris Bernstein University of Arizona
Nicholas J. Talley
Nicholas J. Talley University of Newcastle Australia
William R. Brugge
William R. Brugge Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring diverse healthcare careers beyond medicine can provide valuable opportunities for students passionate about health. Many choose to pursue roles in administration, nutrition, or advanced nursing to make a difference.

For students interested in leadership, a health administration degree provides essential skills for managing hospitals, clinics, and care facilities. Those aspiring to senior management positions should consider the best mha programs that are CAHME-accredited and recognized for quality education.

Aspiring nurses have pathways to advance their careers through adn to fnp bridge programs, which enable RNs to become Family Nurse Practitioners with increased clinical responsibility and earning potential.

Students passionate about nutrition and preventive health can choose an online bs in nutrition. This degree opens doors to diverse roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, and food science.

These related degrees offer flexible, online options for advancing your healthcare career, with each path supporting the growing demand for skilled professionals in the U.S. health system.

Best Scientists Citing Ronnie Fass

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles