What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
His primary areas of investigation include Genocide, Law, Spanish Civil War, Political economy and Dictatorship.
His study looks at the relationship between Genocide and fields such as Politics, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.
Many of his research projects under Law are closely connected to Merge with Merge, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
The Spanish Civil War study combines topics in areas such as Economic history, International community, Witness and State.
His International community study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Civil society, Ethnic group and Security council.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Freedom of the press, Authoritarianism, Structural violence, International relations and Dissent in addition to Dictatorship.
His most cited work include:
- Rwanda, ten years on: From genocide to dictatorship (273 citations)
- Constructing the truth, dealing with dissent, domesticating the world: governance in post-genocide Rwanda (118 citations)
- L'Afrique des grands lacs en crise (102 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary scientific interests are in Political economy, Genocide, Politics, Democracy and Development economics.
His studies deal with areas such as Economic growth, Political change and Democratization as well as Political economy.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including International community, Human rights and Spanish Civil War.
As a member of one scientific family, Filip Reyntjens mostly works in the field of Spanish Civil War, focusing on Economic history and, on occasion, Fall of man.
His study in the fields of Authoritarianism under the domain of Democracy overlaps with other disciplines such as Commit.
He has researched Development economics in several fields, including Government, Socioeconomics and International relations.
He most often published in these fields:
- Political economy (20.88%)
- Genocide (20.88%)
- Politics (20.88%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Genocide (20.88%)
- Politics (20.88%)
- Development economics (16.48%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Filip Reyntjens mainly investigates Genocide, Politics, Development economics, Democracy and Political economy.
To a larger extent, Filip Reyntjens studies Law with the aim of understanding Genocide.
His Politics study combines topics in areas such as Ethnic group, Human rights and Public administration.
His Development economics study incorporates themes from Government and Poverty, Poverty reduction.
His Democracy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Elite and State.
The various areas that Filip Reyntjens examines in his Political economy study include Democratic consolidation, Democratization and Power.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Political Governance in Post-Genocide Rwanda (68 citations)
- Legal Pluralism and Hybrid Governance: Bridging Two Research Lines (15 citations)
- Militarisation of governance after conflict: beyond the rebel-to-ruler frame–the case of Rwanda (12 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
His primary areas of study are Development economics, Democracy, Politics, Political economy and Human rights.
His study in Development economics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Obligation and Presidential system.
Filip Reyntjens combines subjects such as International community, Refugee, Sanctions and Negotiation with his study of Democracy.
His Politics study frequently draws connections between adjacent fields such as Ethnic group.
His Political economy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Democratic consolidation, Democratization, Elite and Spanish Civil War.
Within one scientific family, Filip Reyntjens focuses on topics pertaining to Hegemony under Human rights, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Genocide.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
