World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
11845
World Ranking
7732
National Ranking
4147

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
12039
World Ranking
7518
National Ranking
3239

James F. Cavanagh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Cavanagh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 107 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James F. Cavanagh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James F. Cavanagh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James F. Cavanagh is affiliated with the University of New Mexico in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on neuroscience and medicine, with an emphasis on cognitive neuroscience, neurology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience. Their work also touches on molecular biology and epidemiology.

The main research topics that characterize their contributions include:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

James F. Cavanagh has published in several venues, among which the most frequent include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neuropharmacology
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by James F. Cavanagh and collaborators are:

  • "Linear predictive coding distinguishes spectral EEG features of Parkinson's disease," 2020, Parkinsonism & Related Disorders
  • "Frontal theta and beta oscillations during lower-limb movement in Parkinson's disease," 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • "Timing variability and midfrontal ~4 Hz rhythms correlate with cognition in Parkinson's disease," 2021, npj Parkinson's Disease
  • "Electrophysiological biomarkers of behavioral dimensions from cross-species paradigms," 2021, Translational Psychiatry
  • "Neural signatures of arbitration between Pavlovian and instrumental action selection," 2021, PLoS Computational Biology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Jonathan L. Brigman
  • Nandakumar S. Narayanan
  • Rachel C. Cole
  • Arturo I. Espinoza
  • Arun Singh

Best Publications

  • Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control

    James F. Cavanagh;Michael J. Frank

  • Prelude to and resolution of an error: EEG phase synchrony reveals cognitive control dynamics during action monitoring

    James F. Cavanagh;Michael X Cohen;Michael X Cohen;John J. B. Allen

  • Subthalamic nucleus stimulation reverses mediofrontal influence over decision threshold

    James F Cavanagh;Thomas V Wiecki;Michael X Cohen;Michael X Cohen;Christina M Figueroa

  • Theta lingua franca: A common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes

    James F. Cavanagh;James F. Cavanagh;Laura Zambrano-Vazquez;John J.B. Allen

  • Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence.

    James F. Cavanagh;Alexander J. Shackman

  • Contemplative/emotion training reduces negative emotional behavior and promotes prosocial responses.

    Margaret E Kemeny;Carol Foltz;James F Cavanagh;Margaret Cullen

  • Frontal theta links prediction errors to behavioral adaptation in reinforcement learning.

    James F. Cavanagh;Michael Joshua Frank;Theresa J. Klein;John J. B. Allen

  • Single-trial regression elucidates the role of prefrontal theta oscillations in response conflict

    Michael X Cohen;James F Cavanagh

  • Eye tracking and pupillometry are indicators of dissociable latent decision processes.

    James F. Cavanagh;Thomas V. Wiecki;Angad Kochar;Michael J. Frank

  • Frontal Theta Reflects Uncertainty and Unexpectedness during Exploration and Exploitation

    James F. Cavanagh;Christina M. Figueroa;Michael X Cohen;Michael X Cohen;Michael J. Frank

  • Common medial frontal mechanisms of adaptive control in humans and rodents

    Nandakumar S Narayanan;James F Cavanagh;Michael J Frank;Mark Laubach

  • fMRI and EEG predictors of dynamic decision parameters during human reinforcement learning.

    Michael J. Frank;Chris Gagne;Erika Nyhus;Sean Masters

  • Frontal Theta Overrides Pavlovian Learning Biases

    James F. Cavanagh;Ian Eisenberg;Marc Guitart-Masip;Quentin Huys

  • Linear predictive coding distinguishes spectral EEG features of Parkinson's disease.

    Fahim Anjum;Soura Dasgupta;Raghuraman Mudumbai;Arun Singh

  • Frontal theta predicts specific cognitive control-induced behavioural changes beyond general reaction time slowing.

    Patrick S. Cooper;Frini Karayanidis;Montana McKewen;Samuel McLellan-Hall

  • Cortical delta activity reflects reward prediction error and related behavioral adjustments, but at different times.

    James F. Cavanagh

  • Mood effects on the ERP processing of emotional intensity in faces : A P3 investigation with depressed students

    James Cavanagh;Mark W. Geisler

  • Task-related dissociation in ERN amplitude as a function of obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

    Theo O.J. Gründler;James F. Cavanagh;Christina M. Figueroa;Michael J. Frank

  • D1-Dependent 4 Hz Oscillations and Ramping Activity in Rodent Medial Frontal Cortex during Interval Timing

    Krystal L. Parker;Kuan-Hua Chen;Johnathan R. Kingyon;James F. Cavanagh

  • Mid-frontal theta activity is diminished during cognitive control in Parkinson's disease.

    Arun Singh;Sarah Pirio Richardson;Nandakumar Narayanan;James F. Cavanagh

  • Multiple Dissociations Between Comorbid Depression and Anxiety on Reward and Punishment Processing: Evidence From Computationally Informed EEG

    James F. Cavanagh;Andrew W. Bismark;Michael J. Frank;John J. B. Allen

  • Social stress reactivity alters reward and punishment learning

    James F. Cavanagh;Michael J. Frank;John J. B. Allen

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Frank
Michael J. Frank Brown University
John J.B. Allen
John J.B. Allen University of Arizona
Michael X Cohen
Michael X Cohen Radboud University
Nandakumar S. Narayanan
Nandakumar S. Narayanan University of Iowa
Andrew R. Mayer
Andrew R. Mayer Mind Research Network
Marc Guitart-Masip
Marc Guitart-Masip Karolinska Institute
Ronald A. Yeo
Ronald A. Yeo University of New Mexico
Margaret E. Kemeny
Margaret E. Kemeny University of California, San Francisco
Paul Ekman
Paul Ekman University of California, San Francisco
Samuel J. Gershman
Samuel J. Gershman Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing a degree related to neuroscience can open doors to a variety of most lucrative majors. As neuroscience is a highly interdisciplinary field, students often explore opportunities in fields like psychology, biomedical engineering, bioinformatics, and cognitive science, each offering competitive salaries and room for specialization.

Today, the path to a neuroscience-related career is more flexible than ever. Accredited institutions offer fully remote degrees through online colleges that accept fafsa, making education more affordable and accessible. This allows students to finance their studies with federal aid while learning at their own pace.

For those looking to enhance their skill set or change careers quickly, targeted programs like what certificates can i get online expand your options. These certifications, such as those in data science, health informatics, or clinical research, can significantly boost earning potential.

Many universities also offer online courses in neuroscience and related disciplines, providing flexible entry points for lifelong learners or those seeking specific expertise. Whether pursuing a full degree or a certificate, these pathways make it easier to advance your neuroscience career on your terms.

Best Scientists Citing James F. Cavanagh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles