World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pierre Cahuc

Pierre Cahuc

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
42
Citations
12769
World Ranking
2019
National Ranking
44

Pierre Cahuc publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Cahuc sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 175 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Pierre Cahuc D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pierre Cahuc sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pierre Cahuc is affiliated with Sciences Po in France and has contributed extensively to the fields of economics, econometrics, and finance, as well as social sciences and health professions. Their research primarily focuses on labor market dynamics and wage inequality, employment and welfare studies, and firm innovation and growth. Additional topics of interest include law, economics, judicial systems, corporate finance and governance, retirement, disability, employment, and labor movements and unions.

Their recent scholarly output includes several publications circulated in prominent venues such as the SSRN Electronic Journal and the European Economic Review. Notable papers include "The Heterogeneous Impact of Short-Time Work: From Saved Jobs to Windfall Effects" published in 2021 in the SSRN Electronic Journal; "The effect of workplace vs school-based vocational education on youth unemployment: Evidence from France" from 2023 in the European Economic Review; and "Employment Effects of Restricting Fixed-Term Contracts: Theory and Evidence," released in 2022 also in the SSRN Electronic Journal. Other contributions include "Employment Protection Legislation and Job Reallocation Across Sectors, Firms and Workers: A Survey" from 2024 in SSRN Electronic Journal.

Cahuc frequently collaborates with other researchers. Regular co-authors include Jérémy Hervelin, Arne Uhlendorff, Stéphane Carcillo, Flavien Moreau, and Pauline Carry. These collaborations reflect a concentrated network within labor economics and related fields.

Their research is often published in venues where they are a regular contributor, including the SSRN Electronic Journal with 10 publications, AEA Randomized Controlled Trials with 6, European Economic Review, Annual Review of Economics, and the Journal of the European Economic Association each with one.

  • Main fields of study: Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Social Sciences, Health Professions
  • Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Accounting, Education
  • Main research topics: Labor market dynamics and wage inequality, Employment and Welfare Studies, Firm Innovation and Growth, Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems, Corporate Finance and Governance, Retirement, Disability, and Employment, Labor Movements and Unions
  • Frequent co-authors: Jérémy Hervelin, Arne Uhlendorff, Stéphane Carcillo, Flavien Moreau, Pauline Carry
  • Frequent publication venues: SSRN Electronic Journal, AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, European Economic Review, Annual Review of Economics, Journal of the European Economic Association

Best Publications

  • Inherited Trust and Growth

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc

  • Regulation and Distrust

    Philippe Aghion;Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc;Andrei Shleifer

  • Wage bargaining with on-the-job search: Theory and evidence

    Pierre Cahuc;Fabien Postel-Vinay;Jean-Marc Robin

  • Temporary jobs, employment protection and labor market performance

    Pierre Cahuc;Fabien Postel-Vinay

  • Trust, Growth, and Well-Being: New Evidence and Policy Implications

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc

  • Family Values and the Regulation of Labor

    Alberto F Alesina;Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc;Paola Giuliano

  • Minimum wage unemployment and growth

    Pierre Cahuc;Philippe Michel

  • Two-Tier Labor Markets in the Great Recession: France vs. Spain

    Samuel Bentolila;Pierre Cahuc;Juan José Dolado;Thomas le Barbanchon

  • Teaching Practices and Social Capital

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc;Andrei Shleifer

  • Civic Virtue and Labor Market Institutions

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc

  • La société de défiance : comment le modèle social français s'auto-détruit

    Pierre Cahuc;Yann Algan

  • Explaining the spread of temporary jobs and its impact on labor turnover

    Pierre Cahuc;Olivier Charlot;Franck Malherbet

  • Trust and Growth

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc;Pierre Cahuc

  • Civic Attitudes and the Design of Labour Market Institutions: Which Countries Can Implement the Danish Flexicurity Model?

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc

  • Public employment and labour market performance

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc;André Zylberberg

  • La nouvelle microéconomie

    Pierre Cahuc

  • A THEORY OF WAGES AND LABOR DEMAND WITH INTRA‐FIRM BARGAINING AND MATCHING FRICTIONS*

    Pierre Cahuc;Francois Marque;Francois Marque;Etienne Wasmer;Etienne Wasmer

  • Job Protection: The Macho Hypothesis

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc

  • Youth Unemployment in Old Europe: The Polar Cases of France and Germany

    Pierre Cahuc;Stéphane Carcillo;Ulf Rinne;Klaus F. Zimmermann

  • The Roots of Low European Employment: Family Culture?

    Yann Algan;Pierre Cahuc

  • Two‐Tier Labour Markets in the Great Recession: France Versus Spain-super-

    Samuel Bentolila;Pierre Cahuc;Juan J. Dolado;Thomas Le Barbanchon

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippe Aghion
Philippe Aghion London School of Economics and Political Science
Andrei Shleifer
Andrei Shleifer Harvard University
Fabien Postel-Vinay
Fabien Postel-Vinay University College London
Klaus F. Zimmermann
Klaus F. Zimmermann Maastricht University
Francis Kramarz
Francis Kramarz Collège de France
Alberto Alesina
Alberto Alesina Harvard University
Juan J. Dolado
Juan J. Dolado European University Institute
Jean-Marc Robin
Jean-Marc Robin Sciences Po
Paul Beaudry
Paul Beaudry University of British Columbia
Guy Laroque
Guy Laroque University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens up a wide range of online education options and career paths. Many students interested in advancing their business knowledge are looking for no gmat online mba programs, making it easier to apply without standardized testing barriers.

Cost is another important consideration. Today, there are online mba programs under 40k, helping students pursue high-quality education while managing their budgets. Affordability paired with flexibility is a key reason for the growing popularity of online degrees.

If your interests go beyond traditional finance, specialized degrees such as a social media management degree online open doors to marketing roles in today’s digital economy. Similarly, those interested in hospitality and travel can gain industry-specific skills through a resort management degree online.

Whether you aim for leadership in finance, marketing, or hospitality, these online degree options provide accessible paths toward specialized careers while allowing you to study around your existing commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Pierre Cahuc

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles