World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
7415
World Ranking
7616
National Ranking
3300

Ronald A. Cole publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald A. Cole sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ronald A. Cole D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald A. Cole sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald A. Cole is affiliated with Boulder Language Technologies in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including Environmental Science and Materials Science, with detailed work in subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Materials Chemistry, Ecology, Artificial Intelligence, and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics that include:

  • Mercury impact and mitigation studies
  • Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Speech and dialogue systems
  • Molten salt chemistry and electrochemical processes
  • Nuclear Materials and Properties
  • Fusion materials and technologies

Ronald A. Cole has collaborated with several frequent co-authors, including:

  • Xinrong Ren
  • Winston T. Luke
  • Paul Kelley
  • Mark Cohen
  • Mark L. Olson

Their publications appear in a range of venues that reflect their interdisciplinary expertise. These venues include:

  • Atmosphere
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films

Highlighted recent papers by Ronald A. Cole include:

  • Long-Term Observations of Atmospheric Speciated Mercury at a Coastal Site in the Northern Gulf of Mexico during 2007-2018 (2020, Atmosphere)
  • My Science Tutor (MyST) -- A Large Corpus of Children's Conversational Speech (2023, arXiv [Cornell University])
  • Small-scale production of bespoke accelerated aging plutonium alloy (2025, Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films)

Best Publications

  • Reviewing automatic language identification

    Y.K. Muthusamy;E. Barnard;R.A. Cole

  • The OGI multi-language telephone speech corpus.

    Yeshwant K. Muthusamy;Ronald A. Cole;Beatrice T. Oshika

  • The challenge of spoken language systems: Research directions for the nineties

    R. Cole;L. Hirschman;L. Atlas;M. Beckman

  • Universal speech tools: the CSLU toolkit.

    Stephen Sutton;Ronald A. Cole;Jacques de Villiers;Johan Schalkwyk

  • Spoken letter recognition

    Ronald Cole;Mark Fanty

  • Listening for mispronunciations: A measure of what we hear during speech

    Ronald A. Cole

  • A performance comparison of trained multilayer perceptrons and trained classification trees

    L. Atlas;J. Connor;D. Park;M. El-Sharkawi

  • New telephone speech corpora at CSLU.

    Ronald A. Cole;Mike Noel;Terri Lander;T. Durham

  • Sound and spelling in spoken word recognition.

    Jola Jakimik;Ronald A Cole;Alexander I Rudnicky

  • Developing and evaluating conversational agents

    Dominic W. Massaro;Michael M. Cohen;Jonas Beskow;Ronald A. Cole

  • Perceptive animated interfaces: first steps toward a new paradigm for human-computer interaction

    R. Cole;S. Van Vuuren;B. Pellom;K. Hacioglu

  • Perceptibility of phonetic features in fluent speech.

    Ronald A. Cole;Jola Jakimik;William E. Cooper

  • Children's speech recognition with application to interactive books and tutors

    A. Hagen;B. Pellom;R. Cole

  • Spoken Letter Recognition

    Mark Fanty;Ronald Cole

  • The OGI kids² speech corpus and recognizers.

    Khaldoun Shobaki;John-Paul Hosom;Ronald A. Cole

  • Listening for mispronunciations in a children's story: The use of context by children and adults

    Ronald A. Cole;Charles A. Perfetti

  • The contribution of consonants versus vowels to word recognition in fluent speech

    Unknown

  • Perceptual benchmarks for automatic language identification

    Unknown

  • Highly accurate children's speech recognition for interactive reading tutors using subword units

    Andreas Hagen;Bryan Pellom;Ronald Cole

  • Pitch detection with a neural-net classifier

    E. Barnard;R.A. Cole;M.P. Vea;F.A. Alleva

  • Sentactics®: Computer-automated treatment of underlying forms

    Cynthia K Thompson;Jung Won Janet Choy;Audrey Holland;Ronald Cole

  • University of Colorado dialog systems for travel and navigation

    B. Pellom;W. Ward;J. Hansen;R. Cole

  • Experiments on spectrogram reading

    V. Zue;R. Cole

  • Perception and production of fluent speech

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne H. Ward
Wayne H. Ward University of Colorado Boulder
Etienne Barnard
Etienne Barnard North-West University
Mohammad H. Mahoor
Mohammad H. Mahoor University of Denver
José A. B. Fortes
José A. B. Fortes University of Florida
Don Towsley
Don Towsley University of Massachusetts Amherst
Sameer Pradhan
Sameer Pradhan Vassar College
Annie I. Antón
Annie I. Antón Georgia Institute of Technology
Jaime G. Carbonell
Jaime G. Carbonell Carnegie Mellon University
Dominic W. Massaro
Dominic W. Massaro University of California, Santa Cruz
Audrey Holland
Audrey Holland University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens the door to numerous related online degrees and flexible career pathways. For those interested in broadening their expertise, consider exploring engineering fields. The online electrical engineering degree ranking highlights top programs for students who want to expand into hardware systems and applied technology.

If you’re looking to quickly boost your earning potential or switch careers, quick certifications that pay well are an excellent option. These certifications can be completed in a short time, helping you secure roles in tech support, network security, or project management without committing to a full degree.

Many professionals are interested in advancing their education but need results fast. For these individuals, checking out the fastest online master's degree programs can save time while still providing career-boosting credentials.

Choosing the right graduate degree is crucial for long-term success. To ensure your effort pays off, explore which master's degree is most in demand in USA and target programs with strong job prospects. This strategic approach can help secure rewarding roles in today’s competitive tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Ronald A. Cole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles